使用不同比例石粉作为细骨料的混凝土抗压强度评估

Aashis Malla, N. Kc, R. Aryal, B. R. Joshi
{"title":"使用不同比例石粉作为细骨料的混凝土抗压强度评估","authors":"Aashis Malla, N. Kc, R. Aryal, B. R. Joshi","doi":"10.3126/hijase.v4i2.62186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Concrete is the most dynamic engineering material in construction due to its durability and strength  properties, which have been used in almost all types of physical infrastructure construction. Crushed stone dust is a supplementary material that can be utilized to produce sustainable concrete. The concept of replacing natural fine aggregate in concrete production with stone dust (SD) could enhance the consumption of stone dust produced during aggregate production as well as reduce the requirement for landfill area for stone dust management. The study aims to compare the compressive strength of nominal mixed M20 and M25-grade concrete by replacing fine aggregates with stone dust. The results reveal that compressive strength increases with an increase in stone dust, but the rise in SD percentages beyond a certain level has a negative impact on the strength of concrete. However, fresh density has a similar trend of compressive strength, and the workability of concrete shows a declining trend with a rise in SD levels. From the results of the experimental investigations conducted, it is concluded that the SD can be used as a replacement for fine aggregate. It is found that 40% replacement of fine aggregate by SD gives a maximum compressive strength than normal M20 and M25 grade concrete, which starts decreasing beyond 40% replacement. The compressive strength of the concrete has been quantified by replacing sand with varying percentages of stone dust and found that it does not satisfy the specification except for 40% replacement for M20 grade concrete, though it can be used for low and medium strength concrete production. The cost savings for M20 and M25-grade concrete at 40% sand replacement are 8.23% and 7.62%, respectively.","PeriodicalId":122917,"journal":{"name":"Himalayan Journal of Applied Science and Engineering","volume":"57 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Compressive Strength of Concrete with Various Proportions of Stone Dust as Fine Aggregate\",\"authors\":\"Aashis Malla, N. Kc, R. Aryal, B. R. Joshi\",\"doi\":\"10.3126/hijase.v4i2.62186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Concrete is the most dynamic engineering material in construction due to its durability and strength  properties, which have been used in almost all types of physical infrastructure construction. Crushed stone dust is a supplementary material that can be utilized to produce sustainable concrete. The concept of replacing natural fine aggregate in concrete production with stone dust (SD) could enhance the consumption of stone dust produced during aggregate production as well as reduce the requirement for landfill area for stone dust management. The study aims to compare the compressive strength of nominal mixed M20 and M25-grade concrete by replacing fine aggregates with stone dust. The results reveal that compressive strength increases with an increase in stone dust, but the rise in SD percentages beyond a certain level has a negative impact on the strength of concrete. However, fresh density has a similar trend of compressive strength, and the workability of concrete shows a declining trend with a rise in SD levels. From the results of the experimental investigations conducted, it is concluded that the SD can be used as a replacement for fine aggregate. It is found that 40% replacement of fine aggregate by SD gives a maximum compressive strength than normal M20 and M25 grade concrete, which starts decreasing beyond 40% replacement. The compressive strength of the concrete has been quantified by replacing sand with varying percentages of stone dust and found that it does not satisfy the specification except for 40% replacement for M20 grade concrete, though it can be used for low and medium strength concrete production. The cost savings for M20 and M25-grade concrete at 40% sand replacement are 8.23% and 7.62%, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":122917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Himalayan Journal of Applied Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"57 22\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Himalayan Journal of Applied Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3126/hijase.v4i2.62186\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Himalayan Journal of Applied Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/hijase.v4i2.62186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

混凝土因其耐久性和强度特性而成为建筑业中最具活力的工程材料,几乎被用于所有类型的有形基础设施建设。碎石粉是一种可用于生产可持续混凝土的辅助材料。在混凝土生产中用石粉(SD)替代天然细骨料的概念可提高骨料生产过程中产生的石粉消耗量,并减少石粉管理对垃圾填埋场面积的要求。本研究旨在比较用石粉替代细骨料后名义混合 M20 和 M25 级混凝土的抗压强度。结果表明,抗压强度随着石粉的增加而增加,但石粉百分比的增加超过一定水平会对混凝土强度产生负面影响。然而,新拌密度的变化趋势与抗压强度相似,混凝土的工作性则随着石粉含量的增加而呈下降趋势。从实验研究的结果可以得出结论,标养料可以用来替代细骨料。研究发现,与普通 M20 和 M25 级混凝土相比,用 SD 替代 40% 的细骨料可获得最大抗压强度,但当替代率超过 40% 时,抗压强度开始下降。通过用不同比例的石粉替代砂子,对混凝土的抗压强度进行了量化,发现除 M20 级混凝土的 40% 替代率外,石粉替代率并不能满足规范要求,尽管石粉替代率可用于中低强度混凝土的生产。M20 和 M25 级混凝土用石粉替代 40% 的砂可分别节省 8.23% 和 7.62% 的成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Compressive Strength of Concrete with Various Proportions of Stone Dust as Fine Aggregate
Concrete is the most dynamic engineering material in construction due to its durability and strength  properties, which have been used in almost all types of physical infrastructure construction. Crushed stone dust is a supplementary material that can be utilized to produce sustainable concrete. The concept of replacing natural fine aggregate in concrete production with stone dust (SD) could enhance the consumption of stone dust produced during aggregate production as well as reduce the requirement for landfill area for stone dust management. The study aims to compare the compressive strength of nominal mixed M20 and M25-grade concrete by replacing fine aggregates with stone dust. The results reveal that compressive strength increases with an increase in stone dust, but the rise in SD percentages beyond a certain level has a negative impact on the strength of concrete. However, fresh density has a similar trend of compressive strength, and the workability of concrete shows a declining trend with a rise in SD levels. From the results of the experimental investigations conducted, it is concluded that the SD can be used as a replacement for fine aggregate. It is found that 40% replacement of fine aggregate by SD gives a maximum compressive strength than normal M20 and M25 grade concrete, which starts decreasing beyond 40% replacement. The compressive strength of the concrete has been quantified by replacing sand with varying percentages of stone dust and found that it does not satisfy the specification except for 40% replacement for M20 grade concrete, though it can be used for low and medium strength concrete production. The cost savings for M20 and M25-grade concrete at 40% sand replacement are 8.23% and 7.62%, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信