Carlotta Sackmann, Gregor Weißflog, Daniela Bodschwinna, Klaus Hönig, Jochen Ernst
{"title":"血液肿瘤患者的不同应对结构:血液肿瘤中DC和IC的相互作用对个体应对的影响","authors":"Carlotta Sackmann, Gregor Weißflog, Daniela Bodschwinna, Klaus Hönig, Jochen Ernst","doi":"10.1155/2024/3272185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Objective</i>. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between individual coping (IC) and dyadic coping (DC), more specifically the respective predictive impact of DC and sociodemographic, partnership-related, and medical variables on IC in haematological cancer patients. <i>Methods</i>. In this multicenter longitudinal study, we examined DCI (Dyadic Coping Inventory) and IC (Freiburg Questionnaire on Coping with Illness) in 214 haematological cancer patients after their treatment and six months later. Associations between the coping constructs were calculated using Pearson correlations. Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to examine the predictive impact of patient-specific variables on IC strategies. <i>Results</i>. Pearson correlation revealed numerous significant associations between DC and IC at the baseline and follow-up, but none of them yielded <i>r</i> ≥ |0.4| (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Regression analyses showed a predictive impact of supportive DC on compliance (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and of common DC on active IC (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Concerning patient-specific variables, age stood out as a positive predictor of trivialization (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and compliance (<i>p</i> < 0.01) and psychological distress as a predictor of depressive IC (<i>p</i> < 0.001), distraction (<i>p</i> < 0.05), and trivialization (<i>p</i> < 0.05). <i>Conclusion</i>. Our results indicate that patients’ personal characteristics, such as age and psychological distress, outweigh the influence of DC on IC in haematological cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11953,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer Care","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Different Coping Constructs in Haematological Cancer Patients: The Influence of Dyadic on Individual Coping Interplay of DC and IC in Haematological Cancer\",\"authors\":\"Carlotta Sackmann, Gregor Weißflog, Daniela Bodschwinna, Klaus Hönig, Jochen Ernst\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/3272185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><i>Objective</i>. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between individual coping (IC) and dyadic coping (DC), more specifically the respective predictive impact of DC and sociodemographic, partnership-related, and medical variables on IC in haematological cancer patients. <i>Methods</i>. In this multicenter longitudinal study, we examined DCI (Dyadic Coping Inventory) and IC (Freiburg Questionnaire on Coping with Illness) in 214 haematological cancer patients after their treatment and six months later. Associations between the coping constructs were calculated using Pearson correlations. Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to examine the predictive impact of patient-specific variables on IC strategies. <i>Results</i>. Pearson correlation revealed numerous significant associations between DC and IC at the baseline and follow-up, but none of them yielded <i>r</i> ≥ |0.4| (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Regression analyses showed a predictive impact of supportive DC on compliance (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and of common DC on active IC (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Concerning patient-specific variables, age stood out as a positive predictor of trivialization (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and compliance (<i>p</i> < 0.01) and psychological distress as a predictor of depressive IC (<i>p</i> < 0.001), distraction (<i>p</i> < 0.05), and trivialization (<i>p</i> < 0.05). <i>Conclusion</i>. Our results indicate that patients’ personal characteristics, such as age and psychological distress, outweigh the influence of DC on IC in haematological cancer patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Cancer Care\",\"volume\":\"2024 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Cancer Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/3272185\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/3272185","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的本研究旨在探讨血液肿瘤患者的个人应对(IC)与伴侣应对(DC)之间的关系,更具体地说,研究伴侣应对与社会人口学变量、伴侣关系相关变量和医疗变量各自对个人应对的预测影响。研究方法在这项多中心纵向研究中,我们调查了 214 名血液肿瘤患者在接受治疗后和六个月后的应对问卷(DCI)和 IC(弗莱堡疾病应对问卷)。采用皮尔逊相关性计算了各应对方式之间的关联。进行了多元线性回归分析,以研究患者特定变量对 IC 策略的预测影响。结果显示皮尔逊相关性显示,在基线和随访期间,DC和IC之间存在许多显著的相关性,但没有一个相关性的r≥0.4(p<0.01)。回归分析表明,支持性 DC 对依从性有预测影响(p<0.05),普通 DC 对活动性 IC 有预测影响(p<0.01)。关于患者特异性变量,年龄是琐碎化(p<0.001)和依从性(p<0.01)的积极预测因素,而心理困扰则是抑郁性 IC(p<0.001)、分散注意力(p<0.05)和琐碎化(p<0.05)的预测因素。结论我们的研究结果表明,血液肿瘤患者的个人特征,如年龄和心理困扰,超过了 DC 对 IC 的影响。
Different Coping Constructs in Haematological Cancer Patients: The Influence of Dyadic on Individual Coping Interplay of DC and IC in Haematological Cancer
Objective. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between individual coping (IC) and dyadic coping (DC), more specifically the respective predictive impact of DC and sociodemographic, partnership-related, and medical variables on IC in haematological cancer patients. Methods. In this multicenter longitudinal study, we examined DCI (Dyadic Coping Inventory) and IC (Freiburg Questionnaire on Coping with Illness) in 214 haematological cancer patients after their treatment and six months later. Associations between the coping constructs were calculated using Pearson correlations. Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to examine the predictive impact of patient-specific variables on IC strategies. Results. Pearson correlation revealed numerous significant associations between DC and IC at the baseline and follow-up, but none of them yielded r ≥ |0.4| (p < 0.01). Regression analyses showed a predictive impact of supportive DC on compliance (p < 0.05) and of common DC on active IC (p < 0.01). Concerning patient-specific variables, age stood out as a positive predictor of trivialization (p < 0.001) and compliance (p < 0.01) and psychological distress as a predictor of depressive IC (p < 0.001), distraction (p < 0.05), and trivialization (p < 0.05). Conclusion. Our results indicate that patients’ personal characteristics, such as age and psychological distress, outweigh the influence of DC on IC in haematological cancer patients.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Cancer Care aims to encourage comprehensive, multiprofessional cancer care across Europe and internationally. It publishes original research reports, literature reviews, guest editorials, letters to the Editor and special features on current issues affecting the care of cancer patients. The Editor welcomes contributions which result from team working or collaboration between different health and social care providers, service users, patient groups and the voluntary sector in the areas of:
- Primary, secondary and tertiary care for cancer patients
- Multidisciplinary and service-user involvement in cancer care
- Rehabilitation, supportive, palliative and end of life care for cancer patients
- Policy, service development and healthcare evaluation in cancer care
- Psychosocial interventions for patients and family members
- International perspectives on cancer care