左束支阻滞心衰患者的左束支起搏与双心室起搏:系统回顾与荟萃分析

IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Farah Yasmin, Abdul Moeed, R. Ochani, Hamna Raheel, Malik Ali Ehtsham Awan, Ayesha Liaquat, Arisha Saleem, Muhammad Aamir, Nael Hawwa, Salim Surani
{"title":"左束支阻滞心衰患者的左束支起搏与双心室起搏:系统回顾与荟萃分析","authors":"Farah Yasmin, Abdul Moeed, R. Ochani, Hamna Raheel, Malik Ali Ehtsham Awan, Ayesha Liaquat, Arisha Saleem, Muhammad Aamir, Nael Hawwa, Salim Surani","doi":"10.4330/wjc.v16.i1.40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\n Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is a novel pacing modality of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) that achieves more physiologic native ventricular activation than biventricular pacing (BiVP).\n AIM\n To explore the validity of electromechanical resynchronization, clinical and echocardiographic response of LBBP-CRT.\n METHODS\n Systematic review and Meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the standard guidelines as mentioned in detail in the methodology section.\n RESULTS\n In our analysis, the success rate of LBBP-CRT was determined to be 91.1%. LBBP-CRT significantly shortened QRS duration, with significant improvement in echocardiographic parameters, including left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and left ventricular end-systolic diameter in comparison with BiVP-CRT.\n CONCLUSION\n A significant reduction in New York Heart Association class and B-type natriuretic peptide levels was also observed in the LBBP-CRT group vs BiVP-CRT group. Lastly, the LBBP-CRT cohort had a reduced pacing threshold at follow-up as compared to BiVP-CRT.","PeriodicalId":23800,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Cardiology","volume":"53 29","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Left bundle branch pacing vs biventricular pacing in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Farah Yasmin, Abdul Moeed, R. Ochani, Hamna Raheel, Malik Ali Ehtsham Awan, Ayesha Liaquat, Arisha Saleem, Muhammad Aamir, Nael Hawwa, Salim Surani\",\"doi\":\"10.4330/wjc.v16.i1.40\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\n Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is a novel pacing modality of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) that achieves more physiologic native ventricular activation than biventricular pacing (BiVP).\\n AIM\\n To explore the validity of electromechanical resynchronization, clinical and echocardiographic response of LBBP-CRT.\\n METHODS\\n Systematic review and Meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the standard guidelines as mentioned in detail in the methodology section.\\n RESULTS\\n In our analysis, the success rate of LBBP-CRT was determined to be 91.1%. LBBP-CRT significantly shortened QRS duration, with significant improvement in echocardiographic parameters, including left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and left ventricular end-systolic diameter in comparison with BiVP-CRT.\\n CONCLUSION\\n A significant reduction in New York Heart Association class and B-type natriuretic peptide levels was also observed in the LBBP-CRT group vs BiVP-CRT group. Lastly, the LBBP-CRT cohort had a reduced pacing threshold at follow-up as compared to BiVP-CRT.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"53 29\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v16.i1.40\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v16.i1.40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 左束支起搏(LBBP)是心脏再同步化疗法(CRT)的一种新型起搏方式,与双心室起搏(BiVP)相比,它能实现更符合生理的原生心室激活。目的 探讨 LBBP-CRT 的机电再同步、临床和超声心动图反应的有效性。方法 根据标准指南进行系统回顾和 Meta 分析,详见方法部分。结果 在我们的分析中,LBBP-CRT 的成功率被确定为 91.1%。与 BiVP-CRT 相比,LBBP-CRT 能明显缩短 QRS 间期,并显著改善超声心动图参数,包括左室射血分数、左室舒张末期直径和左室收缩末期直径。结论 LBBP-CRT 组与 BiVP-CRT 组相比,纽约心脏协会分级和 B 型钠尿肽水平也明显降低。最后,与 BiVP-CRT 相比,LBBP-CRT 组随访时起搏阈值降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Left bundle branch pacing vs biventricular pacing in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block: A systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is a novel pacing modality of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) that achieves more physiologic native ventricular activation than biventricular pacing (BiVP). AIM To explore the validity of electromechanical resynchronization, clinical and echocardiographic response of LBBP-CRT. METHODS Systematic review and Meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the standard guidelines as mentioned in detail in the methodology section. RESULTS In our analysis, the success rate of LBBP-CRT was determined to be 91.1%. LBBP-CRT significantly shortened QRS duration, with significant improvement in echocardiographic parameters, including left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and left ventricular end-systolic diameter in comparison with BiVP-CRT. CONCLUSION A significant reduction in New York Heart Association class and B-type natriuretic peptide levels was also observed in the LBBP-CRT group vs BiVP-CRT group. Lastly, the LBBP-CRT cohort had a reduced pacing threshold at follow-up as compared to BiVP-CRT.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Cardiology
World Journal of Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
54
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信