功能金融学的其他用途:勒纳、MMT 和斯拉夫超乘数

IF 1.8 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Ricardo Summa
{"title":"功能金融学的其他用途:勒纳、MMT 和斯拉夫超乘数","authors":"Ricardo Summa","doi":"10.4337/roke.2024.01.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to show that the Sraffian supermultiplier is compatible with functional finance and can be used to discuss macroeconomic policy in a simplified way, providing an alternative to Lerner and Modern Monetary Theory (MMT). We argue that the general functional finance framework (FFF) can be separated from Lerner’s specific views on how the economy works and its policy recommendations. Then, we propose that FFF can be combined with different views on how the economy works as well as policy objectives and instruments. For this, we construct three comparable ‘toy models’ to evaluate the alternative uses of functional finance from Lerner, MMT, and the Sraffian supermultiplier. We use these toy models to provide an alternative comparison between Lerner and the MMT to that proposed by Wray (2018), and we argue that Lerner never abandoned his FFF or his theoretical principles towards Monetarism. We use this same scheme to evaluate the FFF from the standpoint of the Sraffian supermultiplier. The presentation of these three comparable ‘toy models’ helps to stress the shared principles and specific disagreements among Lerner, MMT, and the Sraffian supermultiplier and to discuss their implications for active economic policies and their constraints in open economies.","PeriodicalId":45671,"journal":{"name":"Review of Keynesian Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alternative uses of functional finance: Lerner, MMT, and the Sraffian supermultiplier\",\"authors\":\"Ricardo Summa\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/roke.2024.01.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this paper is to show that the Sraffian supermultiplier is compatible with functional finance and can be used to discuss macroeconomic policy in a simplified way, providing an alternative to Lerner and Modern Monetary Theory (MMT). We argue that the general functional finance framework (FFF) can be separated from Lerner’s specific views on how the economy works and its policy recommendations. Then, we propose that FFF can be combined with different views on how the economy works as well as policy objectives and instruments. For this, we construct three comparable ‘toy models’ to evaluate the alternative uses of functional finance from Lerner, MMT, and the Sraffian supermultiplier. We use these toy models to provide an alternative comparison between Lerner and the MMT to that proposed by Wray (2018), and we argue that Lerner never abandoned his FFF or his theoretical principles towards Monetarism. We use this same scheme to evaluate the FFF from the standpoint of the Sraffian supermultiplier. The presentation of these three comparable ‘toy models’ helps to stress the shared principles and specific disagreements among Lerner, MMT, and the Sraffian supermultiplier and to discuss their implications for active economic policies and their constraints in open economies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Keynesian Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Keynesian Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2024.01.02\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Keynesian Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2024.01.02","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是要说明,斯拉夫超乘数与功能金融学是兼容的,可以用来以简化的方式讨论宏观经济政策,为勒纳和现代货币理论(MMT)提供一个替代方案。我们认为,一般功能金融框架(FFF)可以与勒纳关于经济运行的具体观点及其政策建议分开。然后,我们提出 FFF 可以与关于经济运行方式以及政策目标和工具的不同观点相结合。为此,我们构建了三个可比较的 "玩具模型",以评估勒纳、MMT 和 Sraffian 超乘数对函数金融学的替代使用。与 Wray(2018)提出的比较不同,我们利用这些玩具模型提供了勒纳与 MMT 之间的另一种比较,我们认为勒纳从未放弃他的 FFF 或他的理论原则,而转向货币主义。我们使用同样的方案,从斯拉夫超乘数的角度来评估 FFF。对这三个可比较的 "玩具模型 "的介绍有助于强调勒纳、MMT 和 Sraffian 超级乘数之间的共同原则和具体分歧,并讨论它们对开放经济中的积极经济政策及其约束的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Alternative uses of functional finance: Lerner, MMT, and the Sraffian supermultiplier
The purpose of this paper is to show that the Sraffian supermultiplier is compatible with functional finance and can be used to discuss macroeconomic policy in a simplified way, providing an alternative to Lerner and Modern Monetary Theory (MMT). We argue that the general functional finance framework (FFF) can be separated from Lerner’s specific views on how the economy works and its policy recommendations. Then, we propose that FFF can be combined with different views on how the economy works as well as policy objectives and instruments. For this, we construct three comparable ‘toy models’ to evaluate the alternative uses of functional finance from Lerner, MMT, and the Sraffian supermultiplier. We use these toy models to provide an alternative comparison between Lerner and the MMT to that proposed by Wray (2018), and we argue that Lerner never abandoned his FFF or his theoretical principles towards Monetarism. We use this same scheme to evaluate the FFF from the standpoint of the Sraffian supermultiplier. The presentation of these three comparable ‘toy models’ helps to stress the shared principles and specific disagreements among Lerner, MMT, and the Sraffian supermultiplier and to discuss their implications for active economic policies and their constraints in open economies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The Review of Keynesian Economics (ROKE) is dedicated to the promotion of research in Keynesian economics. Not only does that include Keynesian ideas about macroeconomic theory and policy, it also extends to microeconomic and meso-economic analysis and relevant empirical and historical research. The journal provides a forum for developing and disseminating Keynesian ideas, and intends to encourage critical exchange with other macroeconomic paradigms. The journal is dedicated to the development of Keynesian theory and policy. In our view, Keynesian theory should hold a similar place in economics to that held by the theory of evolution in biology. Many individual economists still work within the Keynesian paradigm, but intellectual success demands institutional support that can leverage those individual efforts. The journal offers such support by providing a forum for developing and sharing Keynesian ideas. Not only does that include ideas about macroeconomic theory and policy, it also extends to microeconomic and meso-economic analysis and relevant empirical and historical research. We see a bright future for the Keynesian approach to macroeconomics and invite the economics profession to join us by subscribing to the journal and submitting manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信