{"title":"让我们畅想未来积极和消极的未来预设对环保行为的影响","authors":"Andrea Essl, David Hauser, Frauke von Bieberstein","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2024.102166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In an online experiment (<em>N</em> = 810), we examine whether primes on positive and negative future events unrelated to an environmental context affects pro-environmental behavior measured with an incentivized decision task. In this task, individuals decide between keeping money for themselves and investing part or the entire amount in planting trees. The results show that participants primed on future events plant significantly more trees and have higher pro-environmental intentions than participants in the control group, who were primed on leisure activities unrelated to the future. However, we find no statistically significant difference between the positive and negative future priming conditions. Exploring different potential mechanisms behind our results, we find that both future primes activated greater concern for the future and the environment, whereas the leisure prime triggered present concerns. While these results align with our research question, we cannot rule out that the leisure priming may have activated other concerns, unrelated to the present or future, potentially leading to fewer trees planted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804324000065/pdfft?md5=33873cd6d2137b8af0de000e038c9d92&pid=1-s2.0-S2214804324000065-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Let's think about the future: The effect of positive and negative future primes on pro-environmental behavior\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Essl, David Hauser, Frauke von Bieberstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socec.2024.102166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In an online experiment (<em>N</em> = 810), we examine whether primes on positive and negative future events unrelated to an environmental context affects pro-environmental behavior measured with an incentivized decision task. In this task, individuals decide between keeping money for themselves and investing part or the entire amount in planting trees. The results show that participants primed on future events plant significantly more trees and have higher pro-environmental intentions than participants in the control group, who were primed on leisure activities unrelated to the future. However, we find no statistically significant difference between the positive and negative future priming conditions. Exploring different potential mechanisms behind our results, we find that both future primes activated greater concern for the future and the environment, whereas the leisure prime triggered present concerns. While these results align with our research question, we cannot rule out that the leisure priming may have activated other concerns, unrelated to the present or future, potentially leading to fewer trees planted.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804324000065/pdfft?md5=33873cd6d2137b8af0de000e038c9d92&pid=1-s2.0-S2214804324000065-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804324000065\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804324000065","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Let's think about the future: The effect of positive and negative future primes on pro-environmental behavior
In an online experiment (N = 810), we examine whether primes on positive and negative future events unrelated to an environmental context affects pro-environmental behavior measured with an incentivized decision task. In this task, individuals decide between keeping money for themselves and investing part or the entire amount in planting trees. The results show that participants primed on future events plant significantly more trees and have higher pro-environmental intentions than participants in the control group, who were primed on leisure activities unrelated to the future. However, we find no statistically significant difference between the positive and negative future priming conditions. Exploring different potential mechanisms behind our results, we find that both future primes activated greater concern for the future and the environment, whereas the leisure prime triggered present concerns. While these results align with our research question, we cannot rule out that the leisure priming may have activated other concerns, unrelated to the present or future, potentially leading to fewer trees planted.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly the Journal of Socio-Economics) welcomes submissions that deal with various economic topics but also involve issues that are related to other social sciences, especially psychology, or use experimental methods of inquiry. Thus, contributions in behavioral economics, experimental economics, economic psychology, and judgment and decision making are especially welcome. The journal is open to different research methodologies, as long as they are relevant to the topic and employed rigorously. Possible methodologies include, for example, experiments, surveys, empirical work, theoretical models, meta-analyses, case studies, and simulation-based analyses. Literature reviews that integrate findings from many studies are also welcome, but they should synthesize the literature in a useful manner and provide substantial contribution beyond what the reader could get by simply reading the abstracts of the cited papers. In empirical work, it is important that the results are not only statistically significant but also economically significant. A high contribution-to-length ratio is expected from published articles and therefore papers should not be unnecessarily long, and short articles are welcome. Articles should be written in a manner that is intelligible to our generalist readership. Book reviews are generally solicited but occasionally unsolicited reviews will also be published. Contact the Book Review Editor for related inquiries.