幼儿对父母的移动设备分心和技术干预的生理反应

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q3 DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
Chris L. Porter, Sarah M. Coyne, Noah A. Chojnacki, Brandon T. McDaniel, Peter J. Reschke, Laura A. Stockdale
{"title":"幼儿对父母的移动设备分心和技术干预的生理反应","authors":"Chris L. Porter,&nbsp;Sarah M. Coyne,&nbsp;Noah A. Chojnacki,&nbsp;Brandon T. McDaniel,&nbsp;Peter J. Reschke,&nbsp;Laura A. Stockdale","doi":"10.1002/dev.22460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Given the prevalence of mobile device use, especially among parents of young children, the current study examines the impact of mobile device distraction (<i>technoference</i>) on toddlers’ physiological and emotional functioning. We suspected that toddlers’ would demonstrate difficultly maintaining physiological and emotional homeostasis when parents became distracted by a mobile device. In this study, we examined toddlers’ (N = 129, M age = 29.05 months) physiological and behavioral responses across three conditions in an induced technoference task that mimicked elements of a traditional still face paradigm (i.e., social engagement, phone distraction, and social recovery). Similar to previous studies employing still face with younger infants, a majority of toddlers demonstrated a loss of positive affective tone mirrored by heart rate increase and respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) decrease (vagal withdrawal) during the phone distraction condition relative to the initial and final social engagement conditions. However, some toddlers demonstrated vagal activation (RSA increase) to parents’ phone distraction. Greater RSA withdrawal was linked to decreased positive affect and increased negative affect for children during parents’ phone distraction. Parents who reported higher levels of technoference were more likely to have children who demonstrated lower vagal reactivity (greater vagal withdrawal) to parents’ phone distraction while parents attitudes about technoference (e.g., “it is okay to use a mobile device in front of my child”) was found to be linked to higher RSA reactivity (greater vagal activation). Findings are discussed in relation to Porges’ polyvagal theory and the possible role that interactive dynamics play in children's emerging regulatory systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":11086,"journal":{"name":"Developmental psychobiology","volume":"66 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toddlers’ physiological response to parent's mobile device distraction and technoference\",\"authors\":\"Chris L. Porter,&nbsp;Sarah M. Coyne,&nbsp;Noah A. Chojnacki,&nbsp;Brandon T. McDaniel,&nbsp;Peter J. Reschke,&nbsp;Laura A. Stockdale\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dev.22460\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Given the prevalence of mobile device use, especially among parents of young children, the current study examines the impact of mobile device distraction (<i>technoference</i>) on toddlers’ physiological and emotional functioning. We suspected that toddlers’ would demonstrate difficultly maintaining physiological and emotional homeostasis when parents became distracted by a mobile device. In this study, we examined toddlers’ (N = 129, M age = 29.05 months) physiological and behavioral responses across three conditions in an induced technoference task that mimicked elements of a traditional still face paradigm (i.e., social engagement, phone distraction, and social recovery). Similar to previous studies employing still face with younger infants, a majority of toddlers demonstrated a loss of positive affective tone mirrored by heart rate increase and respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) decrease (vagal withdrawal) during the phone distraction condition relative to the initial and final social engagement conditions. However, some toddlers demonstrated vagal activation (RSA increase) to parents’ phone distraction. Greater RSA withdrawal was linked to decreased positive affect and increased negative affect for children during parents’ phone distraction. Parents who reported higher levels of technoference were more likely to have children who demonstrated lower vagal reactivity (greater vagal withdrawal) to parents’ phone distraction while parents attitudes about technoference (e.g., “it is okay to use a mobile device in front of my child”) was found to be linked to higher RSA reactivity (greater vagal activation). Findings are discussed in relation to Porges’ polyvagal theory and the possible role that interactive dynamics play in children's emerging regulatory systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental psychobiology\",\"volume\":\"66 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental psychobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dev.22460\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental psychobiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dev.22460","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴于移动设备使用的普遍性,尤其是在幼儿父母中,本研究探讨了移动设备分心(技术分心)对幼儿生理和情绪功能的影响。我们怀疑,当父母因使用移动设备而分心时,幼儿会表现出难以维持生理和情绪的平衡。在本研究中,我们在模仿传统静止面对范例要素(即社交参与、手机分心和社交恢复)的诱导性技术干扰任务中,考察了幼儿(人数 = 129,平均年龄 = 29.05 个月)在三种条件下的生理和行为反应。与之前对年龄较小的婴儿进行的静止面部研究类似,与最初和最后的社交参与条件相比,大多数学步儿童在电话分心条件下表现出积极情绪基调的丧失,表现为心率加快和呼吸窦性心律失常(RSA)减弱(迷走神经退缩)。然而,有些幼儿在父母分散其注意力打电话时表现出迷走神经激活(RSA 增加)。在父母分心打电话的情况下,儿童的 RSA 撤回增加与积极情绪降低和消极情绪增加有关。报告技术偏好程度较高的父母,其子女更有可能对父母的电话分心表现出较低的迷走神经反应性(较大的迷走神经退缩),而父母对技术偏好的态度(如 "在孩子面前使用移动设备是可以的")被发现与较高的 RSA 反应性(较大的迷走神经激活)有关。研究结果将结合 Porges 的多迷走神经理论以及互动动态在儿童新兴调节系统中可能扮演的角色进行讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Toddlers’ physiological response to parent's mobile device distraction and technoference

Given the prevalence of mobile device use, especially among parents of young children, the current study examines the impact of mobile device distraction (technoference) on toddlers’ physiological and emotional functioning. We suspected that toddlers’ would demonstrate difficultly maintaining physiological and emotional homeostasis when parents became distracted by a mobile device. In this study, we examined toddlers’ (N = 129, M age = 29.05 months) physiological and behavioral responses across three conditions in an induced technoference task that mimicked elements of a traditional still face paradigm (i.e., social engagement, phone distraction, and social recovery). Similar to previous studies employing still face with younger infants, a majority of toddlers demonstrated a loss of positive affective tone mirrored by heart rate increase and respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) decrease (vagal withdrawal) during the phone distraction condition relative to the initial and final social engagement conditions. However, some toddlers demonstrated vagal activation (RSA increase) to parents’ phone distraction. Greater RSA withdrawal was linked to decreased positive affect and increased negative affect for children during parents’ phone distraction. Parents who reported higher levels of technoference were more likely to have children who demonstrated lower vagal reactivity (greater vagal withdrawal) to parents’ phone distraction while parents attitudes about technoference (e.g., “it is okay to use a mobile device in front of my child”) was found to be linked to higher RSA reactivity (greater vagal activation). Findings are discussed in relation to Porges’ polyvagal theory and the possible role that interactive dynamics play in children's emerging regulatory systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Developmental psychobiology
Developmental psychobiology 生物-发育生物学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
18.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Developmental Psychobiology is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research papers from the disciplines of psychology, biology, neuroscience, and medicine that contribute to an understanding of behavior development. Research that focuses on development in the embryo/fetus, neonate, juvenile, or adult animal and multidisciplinary research that relates behavioral development to anatomy, physiology, biochemistry, genetics, or evolution is appropriate. The journal represents a broad phylogenetic perspective on behavior development by publishing studies of invertebrates, fish, birds, humans, and other animals. The journal publishes experimental and descriptive studies whether carried out in the laboratory or field. The journal also publishes review articles and theoretical papers that make important conceptual contributions. Special dedicated issues of Developmental Psychobiology , consisting of invited papers on a topic of general interest, may be arranged with the Editor-in-Chief. Developmental Psychobiology also publishes Letters to the Editor, which discuss issues of general interest or material published in the journal. Letters discussing published material may correct errors, provide clarification, or offer a different point of view. Authors should consult the editors on the preparation of these contributions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信