健康的社会决定因素与心力衰竭成人非正规照顾者的应对能力有关。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Clinical Nursing Research Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-30 DOI:10.1177/10547738231223790
Austin Matus, Ryan Quinn, Michael A Stawnychy, Gladys Thomas, Miatta Goba, Jenna Garo, Deborah Gordon, Barbara Riegel
{"title":"健康的社会决定因素与心力衰竭成人非正规照顾者的应对能力有关。","authors":"Austin Matus, Ryan Quinn, Michael A Stawnychy, Gladys Thomas, Miatta Goba, Jenna Garo, Deborah Gordon, Barbara Riegel","doi":"10.1177/10547738231223790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We explored the influence of social determinants of health (SDH) risk on stress and coping style in heart failure (HF) caregivers. In this cross-sectional study, data from 250 caregivers were analyzed. Multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to determine the extent to which SDH risk (measured using a modified PRAPARE tool (National Association of Community Health Centers), range 0-22) predicted stress (Perceived Stress Scale, 0-56) and coping style (active (0-45), avoidance (0-30), and minimization (0-30)) while accounting for caregiver burden (HF Caregiver Questionnaire (HF-CQ) 0-100). Multivariable regression analysis with backwards elimination variable selection approach was used to identify which SDH risk factors best predicted coping styles. SDH risk was significantly associated with avoidance and minimization coping styles. Each unit increase in SDH risk was associated with an increase of 0.6 ± 0.2 units (<i>p</i> = .0008) in avoidance and 0.7 ± 0.2 units (<i>p</i> < .0001) in minimization coping style. Race and \"supporting others\" significantly predicted avoidance coping style; scores were 3.3 ± 0.8 units greater for caregivers who were not White (<i>p</i> < .0001) and 1.4 ± 0.5 units greater (<i>p</i> < .01) for each additional person whom they supported. Race significantly predicted minimization coping style; scores were 4.4 ± 0.7 units greater for caregivers who were not White (<i>p</i> < .0001). Caregivers with higher SDH risk may avoid and minimize to cope with caregiving challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":50677,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nursing Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11188556/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Determinants of Health are Associated with Coping of Informal Caregivers of Adults with Heart Failure.\",\"authors\":\"Austin Matus, Ryan Quinn, Michael A Stawnychy, Gladys Thomas, Miatta Goba, Jenna Garo, Deborah Gordon, Barbara Riegel\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10547738231223790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We explored the influence of social determinants of health (SDH) risk on stress and coping style in heart failure (HF) caregivers. In this cross-sectional study, data from 250 caregivers were analyzed. Multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to determine the extent to which SDH risk (measured using a modified PRAPARE tool (National Association of Community Health Centers), range 0-22) predicted stress (Perceived Stress Scale, 0-56) and coping style (active (0-45), avoidance (0-30), and minimization (0-30)) while accounting for caregiver burden (HF Caregiver Questionnaire (HF-CQ) 0-100). Multivariable regression analysis with backwards elimination variable selection approach was used to identify which SDH risk factors best predicted coping styles. SDH risk was significantly associated with avoidance and minimization coping styles. Each unit increase in SDH risk was associated with an increase of 0.6 ± 0.2 units (<i>p</i> = .0008) in avoidance and 0.7 ± 0.2 units (<i>p</i> < .0001) in minimization coping style. Race and \\\"supporting others\\\" significantly predicted avoidance coping style; scores were 3.3 ± 0.8 units greater for caregivers who were not White (<i>p</i> < .0001) and 1.4 ± 0.5 units greater (<i>p</i> < .01) for each additional person whom they supported. Race significantly predicted minimization coping style; scores were 4.4 ± 0.7 units greater for caregivers who were not White (<i>p</i> < .0001). Caregivers with higher SDH risk may avoid and minimize to cope with caregiving challenges.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Nursing Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11188556/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Nursing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10547738231223790\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10547738231223790","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们探讨了健康的社会决定因素(SDH)风险对心力衰竭(HF)护理人员的压力和应对方式的影响。在这项横断面研究中,我们分析了 250 名护理人员的数据。我们进行了多变量线性回归分析,以确定 SDH 风险(使用改良的 PRAPARE 工具(全国社区卫生中心协会)测量,范围 0-22)对压力(感知压力量表,0-56)和应对方式(积极(0-45)、回避(0-30)和最小化(0-30))的预测程度,同时考虑到护理人员的负担(高频护理人员问卷(HF-CQ)0-100)。采用逆淘汰变量选择法进行多变量回归分析,以确定哪些 SDH 风险因素最能预测应对方式。SDH 风险与回避和最小化应对方式明显相关。SDH 风险每增加一个单位,回避和最小化应对方式就分别增加 0.6 ± 0.2 个单位(p = 0.0008)和 0.7 ± 0.2 个单位(p p p p)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social Determinants of Health are Associated with Coping of Informal Caregivers of Adults with Heart Failure.

We explored the influence of social determinants of health (SDH) risk on stress and coping style in heart failure (HF) caregivers. In this cross-sectional study, data from 250 caregivers were analyzed. Multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to determine the extent to which SDH risk (measured using a modified PRAPARE tool (National Association of Community Health Centers), range 0-22) predicted stress (Perceived Stress Scale, 0-56) and coping style (active (0-45), avoidance (0-30), and minimization (0-30)) while accounting for caregiver burden (HF Caregiver Questionnaire (HF-CQ) 0-100). Multivariable regression analysis with backwards elimination variable selection approach was used to identify which SDH risk factors best predicted coping styles. SDH risk was significantly associated with avoidance and minimization coping styles. Each unit increase in SDH risk was associated with an increase of 0.6 ± 0.2 units (p = .0008) in avoidance and 0.7 ± 0.2 units (p < .0001) in minimization coping style. Race and "supporting others" significantly predicted avoidance coping style; scores were 3.3 ± 0.8 units greater for caregivers who were not White (p < .0001) and 1.4 ± 0.5 units greater (p < .01) for each additional person whom they supported. Race significantly predicted minimization coping style; scores were 4.4 ± 0.7 units greater for caregivers who were not White (p < .0001). Caregivers with higher SDH risk may avoid and minimize to cope with caregiving challenges.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
107
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Nursing Research (CNR) is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that addresses issues of clinical research that are meaningful to practicing nurses, providing an international forum to encourage discussion among clinical practitioners, enhance clinical practice by pinpointing potential clinical applications of the latest scholarly research, and disseminate research findings of particular interest to practicing nurses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信