身体质量指数比身体脂肪指数更能预测女大学生运动员的脂肪含量。

Q1 Health Professions
International journal of exercise science Pub Date : 2024-01-01 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01
Annika C Grams, Anthony M Acevedo, Payton Price, Kyli Alvarez, Malia Nowlen, Riley Morton, Estephania Campa, Zachary S Zeigler
{"title":"身体质量指数比身体脂肪指数更能预测女大学生运动员的脂肪含量。","authors":"Annika C Grams, Anthony M Acevedo, Payton Price, Kyli Alvarez, Malia Nowlen, Riley Morton, Estephania Campa, Zachary S Zeigler","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Body mass index (BMI) is moderately correlated with %Fat and often used to assess obesity in athletes. Limited research assesses BMI as a surrogate for %Fat in female collegiate athletes. Body Adiposity Index (BAI) is an anthropometric measurement suggested to be superior to BMI at predicting adiposity but has not been well assessed within female athletic populations. This study aimed to determine if BAI is superior to other anthropometric indices to predict %Fat in female collegiate athletes and college-aged female non-athletes. Collegiate female athletes and female non-athletes were invited into the laboratory for anthropometrics and %Fat measurements via BOD POD. BAI was calculated as Hip Circumference/Height<sup>1.5</sup> - 18. Eighty-eight female non-athletes and 72 female athletes from soccer (<i>n</i> = 27), softball (<i>n</i> = 28), and basketball (<i>n</i> = 17) completed the study. Using BMI, 19% of non-athletes had a false positive (FP). Sensitivity of BMI in non-athletes was 85.5%, while specificity was 73%. 16% of athletes had a FP. Sensitivity of BMI within athletes was 100%, specificity was 81%. BMI outperformed BAI in athletic (BMI: <i>r</i> = .725, <i>p</i> < .001; BAI: <i>r</i> = .556, <i>p</i> < .001) and nonathletic (BMI: <i>r</i> = .650, <i>p</i> < .001; BAI: <i>r</i> = .499, <i>p</i> < .001) groups. The strongest anthropometric predictor of %Fat within the non-athlete population was BMI (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = .42, <i>p</i> < .001). Waist circumference was the strongest predictor in the athletic population (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = .62, <i>p</i> < .001). BMI outperformed BAI in its ability to predict %Fat.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"16 4","pages":"1487-1498"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10824313/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Body Mass Index Superior to Body Adiposity Index in Predicting Adiposity in Female Collegiate Athletes.\",\"authors\":\"Annika C Grams, Anthony M Acevedo, Payton Price, Kyli Alvarez, Malia Nowlen, Riley Morton, Estephania Campa, Zachary S Zeigler\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Body mass index (BMI) is moderately correlated with %Fat and often used to assess obesity in athletes. Limited research assesses BMI as a surrogate for %Fat in female collegiate athletes. Body Adiposity Index (BAI) is an anthropometric measurement suggested to be superior to BMI at predicting adiposity but has not been well assessed within female athletic populations. This study aimed to determine if BAI is superior to other anthropometric indices to predict %Fat in female collegiate athletes and college-aged female non-athletes. Collegiate female athletes and female non-athletes were invited into the laboratory for anthropometrics and %Fat measurements via BOD POD. BAI was calculated as Hip Circumference/Height<sup>1.5</sup> - 18. Eighty-eight female non-athletes and 72 female athletes from soccer (<i>n</i> = 27), softball (<i>n</i> = 28), and basketball (<i>n</i> = 17) completed the study. Using BMI, 19% of non-athletes had a false positive (FP). Sensitivity of BMI in non-athletes was 85.5%, while specificity was 73%. 16% of athletes had a FP. Sensitivity of BMI within athletes was 100%, specificity was 81%. BMI outperformed BAI in athletic (BMI: <i>r</i> = .725, <i>p</i> < .001; BAI: <i>r</i> = .556, <i>p</i> < .001) and nonathletic (BMI: <i>r</i> = .650, <i>p</i> < .001; BAI: <i>r</i> = .499, <i>p</i> < .001) groups. The strongest anthropometric predictor of %Fat within the non-athlete population was BMI (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = .42, <i>p</i> < .001). Waist circumference was the strongest predictor in the athletic population (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = .62, <i>p</i> < .001). BMI outperformed BAI in its ability to predict %Fat.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of exercise science\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"1487-1498\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10824313/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of exercise science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

身体质量指数(BMI)与脂肪率(%Fat)呈中度相关,通常用于评估运动员的肥胖情况。在女大学生运动员中,将 BMI 作为脂肪率替代物进行评估的研究有限。身体肥胖指数(BAI)是一种人体测量指标,被认为在预测肥胖方面优于体重指数,但在女性运动员群体中尚未得到很好的评估。本研究旨在确定 BAI 在预测大学女运动员和大学适龄非运动员的脂肪率方面是否优于其他人体测量指数。大学女运动员和非运动员被邀请到实验室,通过 BOD POD 进行人体测量和脂肪率测量。BAI 的计算方法为臀围/身高1.5 - 18。来自足球(27 人)、垒球(28 人)和篮球(17 人)的 88 名非运动员和 72 名运动员完成了研究。通过使用体重指数,19% 的非运动员出现了假阳性 (FP)。在非运动员中,BMI 的灵敏度为 85.5%,特异度为 73%。16%的运动员出现了假阳性。在运动员中,BMI 的灵敏度为 100%,特异性为 81%。在运动员组(BMI:r = .725,p < .001;BAI:r = .556,p < .001)和非运动员组(BMI:r = .650,p < .001;BAI:r = .499,p < .001)中,BMI 的表现优于 BAI。在非运动员人群中,体重指数是预测脂肪率的最强人体测量指标(r2 = .42,p < .001)。在运动员群体中,腰围是最强的预测指标(r2 = .62,p < .001)。在预测脂肪率方面,BMI 的表现优于 BAI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Body Mass Index Superior to Body Adiposity Index in Predicting Adiposity in Female Collegiate Athletes.

Body mass index (BMI) is moderately correlated with %Fat and often used to assess obesity in athletes. Limited research assesses BMI as a surrogate for %Fat in female collegiate athletes. Body Adiposity Index (BAI) is an anthropometric measurement suggested to be superior to BMI at predicting adiposity but has not been well assessed within female athletic populations. This study aimed to determine if BAI is superior to other anthropometric indices to predict %Fat in female collegiate athletes and college-aged female non-athletes. Collegiate female athletes and female non-athletes were invited into the laboratory for anthropometrics and %Fat measurements via BOD POD. BAI was calculated as Hip Circumference/Height1.5 - 18. Eighty-eight female non-athletes and 72 female athletes from soccer (n = 27), softball (n = 28), and basketball (n = 17) completed the study. Using BMI, 19% of non-athletes had a false positive (FP). Sensitivity of BMI in non-athletes was 85.5%, while specificity was 73%. 16% of athletes had a FP. Sensitivity of BMI within athletes was 100%, specificity was 81%. BMI outperformed BAI in athletic (BMI: r = .725, p < .001; BAI: r = .556, p < .001) and nonathletic (BMI: r = .650, p < .001; BAI: r = .499, p < .001) groups. The strongest anthropometric predictor of %Fat within the non-athlete population was BMI (r2 = .42, p < .001). Waist circumference was the strongest predictor in the athletic population (r2 = .62, p < .001). BMI outperformed BAI in its ability to predict %Fat.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of exercise science
International journal of exercise science Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信