脊柱融合术后医疗复杂儿童的两种护理模式比较。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Clinical Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-30 DOI:10.1177/00099228241228104
Zachary Semenetz, Amanda M Lewis, Kamyar Arasteh, Tullis Liu, Matthew Demczko
{"title":"脊柱融合术后医疗复杂儿童的两种护理模式比较。","authors":"Zachary Semenetz, Amanda M Lewis, Kamyar Arasteh, Tullis Liu, Matthew Demczko","doi":"10.1177/00099228241228104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with neuromuscular scoliosis following spinal fusion surgery who were cared for post-operatively by either a hospitalist/orthopedics co-management team or a complex care clinic (CCC). Assignment to either treatment group was not random. To account for baseline differences between groups, we calculated propensity scores and used these as probability weights in generalized linear models. After matching, the CCC had a shorter length of stay (LOS, coefficient = -2.60; <i>P</i> = .04) without a significant difference in 30-day readmission rate (<i>P</i> = .62). For secondary outcomes, there were some significant resource utilization benefits favoring the complex care group without significant difference in complication outcomes between groups. In managing patients after spinal fusion surgery, both groups had similar LOS compared with prior studies of children after spinal fusion surgery. Management by the CCC may confer some outcome benefits for their patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10363,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"1537-1543"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of 2 Models of Care for Children With Medical Complexity Following Spinal Fusion.\",\"authors\":\"Zachary Semenetz, Amanda M Lewis, Kamyar Arasteh, Tullis Liu, Matthew Demczko\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00099228241228104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with neuromuscular scoliosis following spinal fusion surgery who were cared for post-operatively by either a hospitalist/orthopedics co-management team or a complex care clinic (CCC). Assignment to either treatment group was not random. To account for baseline differences between groups, we calculated propensity scores and used these as probability weights in generalized linear models. After matching, the CCC had a shorter length of stay (LOS, coefficient = -2.60; <i>P</i> = .04) without a significant difference in 30-day readmission rate (<i>P</i> = .62). For secondary outcomes, there were some significant resource utilization benefits favoring the complex care group without significant difference in complication outcomes between groups. In managing patients after spinal fusion surgery, both groups had similar LOS compared with prior studies of children after spinal fusion surgery. Management by the CCC may confer some outcome benefits for their patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1537-1543\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00099228241228104\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00099228241228104","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们对脊柱融合手术后神经肌肉性脊柱侧凸患者进行了回顾性病历审查,这些患者术后由住院医师/矫形外科共同管理团队或复合护理诊所(CCC)进行护理。治疗组的分配不是随机的。为了考虑各组间的基线差异,我们计算了倾向分数,并将其作为概率权重用于广义线性模型。匹配后,CCC 的住院时间(LOS,系数 = -2.60; P = .04)更短,但 30 天再入院率(P = .62)无显著差异。在次要结果方面,复杂护理组在资源利用方面有一些明显优势,但各组在并发症结果方面没有明显差异。在脊柱融合术后患者的管理方面,与之前对脊柱融合术后儿童的研究相比,两组患者的生命周期相似。CCC的管理可能会给患者带来一些结果上的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of 2 Models of Care for Children With Medical Complexity Following Spinal Fusion.

We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with neuromuscular scoliosis following spinal fusion surgery who were cared for post-operatively by either a hospitalist/orthopedics co-management team or a complex care clinic (CCC). Assignment to either treatment group was not random. To account for baseline differences between groups, we calculated propensity scores and used these as probability weights in generalized linear models. After matching, the CCC had a shorter length of stay (LOS, coefficient = -2.60; P = .04) without a significant difference in 30-day readmission rate (P = .62). For secondary outcomes, there were some significant resource utilization benefits favoring the complex care group without significant difference in complication outcomes between groups. In managing patients after spinal fusion surgery, both groups had similar LOS compared with prior studies of children after spinal fusion surgery. Management by the CCC may confer some outcome benefits for their patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Pediatrics
Clinical Pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
189
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Pediatrics (CLP) a peer-reviewed monthly journal, is a must read for the busy pediatrician. CLP contains state-of-the-art, accurate, concise and down-to earth information on practical, everyday child care topics whether they are clinical, scientific, behavioral, educational, or ethical.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信