环孢素 A 不能减轻猪体外循环死亡后捐献模型中的肝脏缺血/再灌注损伤。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Joshua Hefler, Sanaz Hatami, Aducio Thiesen, Mitchell J Wagner, Guilherme Mainardi, Sayed Himmat, Constantine J Karvellas, David L Bigam, Darren H Freed, A M James Shapiro
{"title":"环孢素 A 不能减轻猪体外循环死亡后捐献模型中的肝脏缺血/再灌注损伤。","authors":"Joshua Hefler, Sanaz Hatami, Aducio Thiesen, Mitchell J Wagner, Guilherme Mainardi, Sayed Himmat, Constantine J Karvellas, David L Bigam, Darren H Freed, A M James Shapiro","doi":"10.12659/AOT.941054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI) is an inherent problem in organ transplantation, owing to the obligate period of ischemia that organs must endure. Cyclosporine A (CsA), though better know as an immunosuppressant, has been shown to mitigate warm IRI in a variety of organ types, including the liver. However, there is little evidence for CsA in preventing hepatic IRI in the transplant setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS In the present study, we tested the effect of CsA on hepatic IRI in a large-animal ex vivo model of donation after circulatory death (DCD). Porcine donors were pre-treated with either normal saline control or 20 mg/kg of CsA. Animals were subject to either 45 or 60 minutes of warm ischemia before hepatectomy, followed by 2 or 4 hours of cold storage prior to reperfusion on an ex vivo circuit. Over the course of a 12-hour perfusion, perfusion parameters were recorded and perfusate samples and biopsies were taken at regular intervals. RESULTS Peak perfusate lactate dehydrogenase was significantly decreased in the lower-ischemia group treated with CsA compared to the untreated group (4220 U/L [3515-5815] vs 11 305 [10 100-11 674]; P=0.023). However, no difference was seen between controls and CsA-treated groups on other parameters in perfusate alanine or asparagine aminotransferase (P=0.912, 0.455, respectively). Correspondingly, we found no difference on midpoint histological injury score (P=0.271). CONCLUSIONS We found minimal evidence that CsA is protective against hepatic IRI in our DCD model.</p>","PeriodicalId":7935,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Transplantation","volume":"29 ","pages":"e941054"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10838008/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cyclosporine A Does Not Mitigate Liver Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury in an Ex Vivo Porcine Model of Donation After Circulatory Death.\",\"authors\":\"Joshua Hefler, Sanaz Hatami, Aducio Thiesen, Mitchell J Wagner, Guilherme Mainardi, Sayed Himmat, Constantine J Karvellas, David L Bigam, Darren H Freed, A M James Shapiro\",\"doi\":\"10.12659/AOT.941054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BACKGROUND Ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI) is an inherent problem in organ transplantation, owing to the obligate period of ischemia that organs must endure. Cyclosporine A (CsA), though better know as an immunosuppressant, has been shown to mitigate warm IRI in a variety of organ types, including the liver. However, there is little evidence for CsA in preventing hepatic IRI in the transplant setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS In the present study, we tested the effect of CsA on hepatic IRI in a large-animal ex vivo model of donation after circulatory death (DCD). Porcine donors were pre-treated with either normal saline control or 20 mg/kg of CsA. Animals were subject to either 45 or 60 minutes of warm ischemia before hepatectomy, followed by 2 or 4 hours of cold storage prior to reperfusion on an ex vivo circuit. Over the course of a 12-hour perfusion, perfusion parameters were recorded and perfusate samples and biopsies were taken at regular intervals. RESULTS Peak perfusate lactate dehydrogenase was significantly decreased in the lower-ischemia group treated with CsA compared to the untreated group (4220 U/L [3515-5815] vs 11 305 [10 100-11 674]; P=0.023). However, no difference was seen between controls and CsA-treated groups on other parameters in perfusate alanine or asparagine aminotransferase (P=0.912, 0.455, respectively). Correspondingly, we found no difference on midpoint histological injury score (P=0.271). CONCLUSIONS We found minimal evidence that CsA is protective against hepatic IRI in our DCD model.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"29 \",\"pages\":\"e941054\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10838008/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12659/AOT.941054\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/AOT.941054","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景缺血/再灌注损伤(IRI)是器官移植中的一个固有问题,因为器官必须承受一段时间的缺血。环孢素 A(CsA)虽然是一种免疫抑制剂,但已被证明可减轻包括肝脏在内的多种类型器官的温性 IRI。然而,目前几乎没有证据表明 CsA 可以预防移植环境中的肝脏 IRI。材料和方法 在本研究中,我们测试了 CsA 在循环死亡后捐献(DCD)的大型动物体外模型中对肝脏 IRI 的影响。猪捐献者预先用生理盐水或 20 毫克/千克的 CsA 进行处理。在肝切除术前,动物先接受 45 或 60 分钟的热缺血,然后冷藏 2 或 4 小时,最后在体外循环上进行再灌注。在 12 小时的灌注过程中,记录灌注参数并定期采集灌注液样本和活组织切片。结果 与未治疗组相比,使用 CsA 治疗的下缺血组灌注液乳酸脱氢酶峰值明显下降(4220 U/L [3515-5815] vs 11 305 [10 100-11 674];P=0.023)。然而,在灌流液丙氨酸或天冬酰胺转氨酶的其他参数上,对照组和 CsA 治疗组之间没有差异(P=0.912,0.455)。相应地,我们发现组织学损伤中点评分没有差异(P=0.271)。结论 我们发现,在我们的 DCD 模型中,CsA 对肝脏 IRI 的保护作用微乎其微。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cyclosporine A Does Not Mitigate Liver Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury in an Ex Vivo Porcine Model of Donation After Circulatory Death.

BACKGROUND Ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI) is an inherent problem in organ transplantation, owing to the obligate period of ischemia that organs must endure. Cyclosporine A (CsA), though better know as an immunosuppressant, has been shown to mitigate warm IRI in a variety of organ types, including the liver. However, there is little evidence for CsA in preventing hepatic IRI in the transplant setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS In the present study, we tested the effect of CsA on hepatic IRI in a large-animal ex vivo model of donation after circulatory death (DCD). Porcine donors were pre-treated with either normal saline control or 20 mg/kg of CsA. Animals were subject to either 45 or 60 minutes of warm ischemia before hepatectomy, followed by 2 or 4 hours of cold storage prior to reperfusion on an ex vivo circuit. Over the course of a 12-hour perfusion, perfusion parameters were recorded and perfusate samples and biopsies were taken at regular intervals. RESULTS Peak perfusate lactate dehydrogenase was significantly decreased in the lower-ischemia group treated with CsA compared to the untreated group (4220 U/L [3515-5815] vs 11 305 [10 100-11 674]; P=0.023). However, no difference was seen between controls and CsA-treated groups on other parameters in perfusate alanine or asparagine aminotransferase (P=0.912, 0.455, respectively). Correspondingly, we found no difference on midpoint histological injury score (P=0.271). CONCLUSIONS We found minimal evidence that CsA is protective against hepatic IRI in our DCD model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Transplantation is one of the fast-developing journals open to all scientists and fields of transplant medicine and related research. The journal is published quarterly and provides extensive coverage of the most important advances in transplantation. Using an electronic on-line submission and peer review tracking system, Annals of Transplantation is committed to rapid review and publication. The average time to first decision is around 3-4 weeks. Time to publication of accepted manuscripts continues to be shortened, with the Editorial team committed to a goal of 3 months from acceptance to publication. Expert reseachers and clinicians from around the world contribute original Articles, Review Papers, Case Reports and Special Reports in every pertinent specialty, providing a lot of arguments for discussion of exciting developments and controversies in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信