"药片不教技能":ADHD辅导、身份认同工作以及对ADHD医学极限化的推动。

IF 6.3 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Journal of Health and Social Behavior Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-27 DOI:10.1177/00221465231220385
Meredith Bergey
{"title":"\"药片不教技能\":ADHD辅导、身份认同工作以及对ADHD医学极限化的推动。","authors":"Meredith Bergey","doi":"10.1177/00221465231220385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite physicians' near monopoly over medicalization historically, various stakeholder groups shape an increasingly complex process today. This study examines a relatively new initiative, \"health coaching,\" within the context of the changing nature of medicalization. Utilizing 51 in-depth interviews with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) coaches, participant observation from seven ADHD symposia, and ADHD coach publications, I examine coaching's emergence as a partial challenge to medicalization. Findings reveal a field comprised mainly of individuals personally affected by ADHD whose dissatisfaction with institutionalized framings and practices underpins a push for liminal medicalization. Members move between medical and nonmedical discourses to frame ADHD as a paradox of pathology and gift. Additionally, they leverage and commodify personal experience alongside institutional and alternative knowledge into an adjunct or substitute to medication and potential challenge to therapy-one aimed at \"self-actualization\" versus \"treatment.\" Such efforts highlight (de)medicalization's dimensionality, simultaneous medicalization and demedicalization, and a lay-driven enterprise's role in such processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health and Social Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"256-272"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Pills Don't Teach Skills\\\": ADHD Coaching, Identity Work, and the Push toward the Liminal Medicalization of ADHD.\",\"authors\":\"Meredith Bergey\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00221465231220385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite physicians' near monopoly over medicalization historically, various stakeholder groups shape an increasingly complex process today. This study examines a relatively new initiative, \\\"health coaching,\\\" within the context of the changing nature of medicalization. Utilizing 51 in-depth interviews with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) coaches, participant observation from seven ADHD symposia, and ADHD coach publications, I examine coaching's emergence as a partial challenge to medicalization. Findings reveal a field comprised mainly of individuals personally affected by ADHD whose dissatisfaction with institutionalized framings and practices underpins a push for liminal medicalization. Members move between medical and nonmedical discourses to frame ADHD as a paradox of pathology and gift. Additionally, they leverage and commodify personal experience alongside institutional and alternative knowledge into an adjunct or substitute to medication and potential challenge to therapy-one aimed at \\\"self-actualization\\\" versus \\\"treatment.\\\" Such efforts highlight (de)medicalization's dimensionality, simultaneous medicalization and demedicalization, and a lay-driven enterprise's role in such processes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health and Social Behavior\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"256-272\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health and Social Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00221465231220385\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health and Social Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00221465231220385","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管从历史上看,医生几乎垄断了医疗化,但如今各种利益相关群体塑造了一个日益复杂的过程。本研究在医疗化性质不断变化的背景下,对 "健康指导 "这一相对较新的举措进行了研究。通过对 51 位注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)教练的深入访谈、对七场注意力缺陷多动障碍研讨会的参与观察以及注意力缺陷多动障碍教练的出版物,我研究了教练作为对医疗化的部分挑战而出现的情况。研究结果表明,这一领域主要由受多动症影响的个人组成,他们对制度化的框架和实践的不满是推动边缘医疗化的基础。成员们在医疗和非医疗话语之间游走,将多动症描述为病理和天赋的悖论。此外,他们还将个人经历与机构知识和替代知识相结合,并将其商品化,使其成为药物治疗的辅助或替代品,以及对治疗的潜在挑战--一种旨在 "自我实现 "而非 "治疗 "的挑战。这些努力凸显了(去)医疗化的维度、同时进行的医疗化和去医疗化,以及非专业人士驱动的企业在这些过程中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Pills Don't Teach Skills": ADHD Coaching, Identity Work, and the Push toward the Liminal Medicalization of ADHD.

Despite physicians' near monopoly over medicalization historically, various stakeholder groups shape an increasingly complex process today. This study examines a relatively new initiative, "health coaching," within the context of the changing nature of medicalization. Utilizing 51 in-depth interviews with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) coaches, participant observation from seven ADHD symposia, and ADHD coach publications, I examine coaching's emergence as a partial challenge to medicalization. Findings reveal a field comprised mainly of individuals personally affected by ADHD whose dissatisfaction with institutionalized framings and practices underpins a push for liminal medicalization. Members move between medical and nonmedical discourses to frame ADHD as a paradox of pathology and gift. Additionally, they leverage and commodify personal experience alongside institutional and alternative knowledge into an adjunct or substitute to medication and potential challenge to therapy-one aimed at "self-actualization" versus "treatment." Such efforts highlight (de)medicalization's dimensionality, simultaneous medicalization and demedicalization, and a lay-driven enterprise's role in such processes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Journal of Health and Social Behavior is a medical sociology journal that publishes empirical and theoretical articles that apply sociological concepts and methods to the understanding of health and illness and the organization of medicine and health care. Its editorial policy favors manuscripts that are grounded in important theoretical issues in medical sociology or the sociology of mental health and that advance theoretical understanding of the processes by which social factors and human health are inter-related.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信