{"title":"奥达帕替尼治疗中重度特应性皮炎的疗效和安全性:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Yuanjie Huang, Limin Cai, Xuerui Wu, Chen Chen","doi":"10.5114/ada.2023.133820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Upadacitinib, an oral selective-JAK1 inhibitor, has been used in clinical trials to treat atopic dermatitis (AD).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in moderate-to-severe AD.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We searched clinical trials from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases, and Web of Science. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of upadacitinib treatment on patients with moderate-to-severe AD were included. A meta-analysis was performed using the fixed- or random-effects models to calculate pooled standard mean differences or relative risks (SMD or RR, respectively).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the placebo group, our meta-analysis revealed that upadacitinib was related to a significant decrease in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores, and pruritus numeric rating scale (NRS) scores. A higher response rate in Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) and EASI-75 were also detected in the upadacitinib group. Although patients treated with upadacitinib experienced a higher incidence of adverse events (AEs), these AEs were mild and tolerated. As for serious adverse events (SAEs), there was no difference between the placebo group and the upadacitinib group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis demonstrated that upadacitinib is a safe and effective treatment for moderate-to-severe AD. Further long-term trials are required for confirmation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54595,"journal":{"name":"Postepy Dermatologii I Alergologii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10809830/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yuanjie Huang, Limin Cai, Xuerui Wu, Chen Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/ada.2023.133820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Upadacitinib, an oral selective-JAK1 inhibitor, has been used in clinical trials to treat atopic dermatitis (AD).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in moderate-to-severe AD.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We searched clinical trials from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases, and Web of Science. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of upadacitinib treatment on patients with moderate-to-severe AD were included. A meta-analysis was performed using the fixed- or random-effects models to calculate pooled standard mean differences or relative risks (SMD or RR, respectively).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the placebo group, our meta-analysis revealed that upadacitinib was related to a significant decrease in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores, and pruritus numeric rating scale (NRS) scores. A higher response rate in Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) and EASI-75 were also detected in the upadacitinib group. Although patients treated with upadacitinib experienced a higher incidence of adverse events (AEs), these AEs were mild and tolerated. As for serious adverse events (SAEs), there was no difference between the placebo group and the upadacitinib group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis demonstrated that upadacitinib is a safe and effective treatment for moderate-to-severe AD. Further long-term trials are required for confirmation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Postepy Dermatologii I Alergologii\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10809830/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Postepy Dermatologii I Alergologii\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/ada.2023.133820\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy Dermatologii I Alergologii","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ada.2023.133820","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介乌达帕替尼是一种口服选择性JAK1抑制剂,已被用于治疗特应性皮炎(AD)的临床试验。目的:评估乌达帕替尼治疗中重度特应性皮炎的疗效和安全性:我们检索了PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆数据库和Web of Science中的临床试验。纳入了所有对中重度AD患者进行达帕替尼治疗的随机对照试验(RCT)。采用固定效应或随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,分别计算汇集的标准均值差异或相对风险(SMD或RR):结果:与安慰剂组相比,我们的荟萃分析表明,达帕替尼可显著降低湿疹面积和严重程度指数(EASI)评分以及瘙痒数字评分量表(NRS)评分。达帕替尼组的研究者总体评估(IGA)和EASI-75反应率也更高。虽然接受达达替尼治疗的患者发生不良事件(AEs)的几率更高,但这些不良事件都很轻微,而且可以耐受。至于严重不良事件(SAEs),安慰剂组与高达替尼组之间没有差异:这项荟萃分析表明,达帕替尼是治疗中度至重度AD的一种安全有效的方法。还需要进一步的长期试验来证实。
Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Introduction: Upadacitinib, an oral selective-JAK1 inhibitor, has been used in clinical trials to treat atopic dermatitis (AD).
Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in moderate-to-severe AD.
Material and methods: We searched clinical trials from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases, and Web of Science. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of upadacitinib treatment on patients with moderate-to-severe AD were included. A meta-analysis was performed using the fixed- or random-effects models to calculate pooled standard mean differences or relative risks (SMD or RR, respectively).
Results: Compared with the placebo group, our meta-analysis revealed that upadacitinib was related to a significant decrease in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores, and pruritus numeric rating scale (NRS) scores. A higher response rate in Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) and EASI-75 were also detected in the upadacitinib group. Although patients treated with upadacitinib experienced a higher incidence of adverse events (AEs), these AEs were mild and tolerated. As for serious adverse events (SAEs), there was no difference between the placebo group and the upadacitinib group.
Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrated that upadacitinib is a safe and effective treatment for moderate-to-severe AD. Further long-term trials are required for confirmation.