{"title":"估算健康雌性家猪的正常肺重量指数","authors":"Antonio Fioccola, Rosmery Valentina Nicolardi, Tommaso Pozzi, Isabella Fratti, Federica Romitti, Francesca Collino, Verena Reupke, Gianluigi Li Bassi, Alessandro Protti, Alessandro Santini, Massimo Cressoni, Mattia Busana, Onnen Moerer, Luigi Camporota, Luciano Gattinoni","doi":"10.1186/s40635-023-00591-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lung weight is an important study endpoint to assess lung edema in porcine experiments on acute respiratory distress syndrome and ventilatory induced lung injury. Evidence on the relationship between lung-body weight relationship is lacking in the literature. The aim of this work is to provide a reference equation between normal lung and body weight in female domestic piglets.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>177 healthy female domestic piglets from previous studies were included in the analysis. Lung weight was assessed either via a CT-scan before any experimental injury or with a scale after autopsy. The animals were randomly divided in a training (n = 141) and a validation population (n = 36). The relation between body weight and lung weight index (lung weight/body weight, g/kg) was described by an exponential function on the training population. The equation was tested on the validation population. A Bland-Altman analysis was performed to compare the lung weight index in the validation population and its theoretical value calculated with the reference equation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A good fit was found between the validation population and the exponential equation extracted from the training population (RMSE = 0.060). The equation to determine lung weight index from body weight was: [Formula: see text] At the Bland and Altman analyses, the mean bias between the real and the expected lung weight index was - 0.26 g/kg (95% CI - 0.96-0.43), upper LOA 3.80 g/kg [95% CI 2.59-5.01], lower LOA - 4.33 g/kg [95% CI = - 5.54-(- 3.12)].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This exponential function might be a valuable tool to assess lung edema in experiments involving 16-50 kg female domestic piglets. The error that can be made due to the 95% confidence intervals of the formula is smaller than the one made considering the lung to body weight as a linear relationship.</p>","PeriodicalId":13750,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","volume":"12 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10811311/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of normal lung weight index in healthy female domestic pigs.\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Fioccola, Rosmery Valentina Nicolardi, Tommaso Pozzi, Isabella Fratti, Federica Romitti, Francesca Collino, Verena Reupke, Gianluigi Li Bassi, Alessandro Protti, Alessandro Santini, Massimo Cressoni, Mattia Busana, Onnen Moerer, Luigi Camporota, Luciano Gattinoni\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40635-023-00591-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lung weight is an important study endpoint to assess lung edema in porcine experiments on acute respiratory distress syndrome and ventilatory induced lung injury. Evidence on the relationship between lung-body weight relationship is lacking in the literature. The aim of this work is to provide a reference equation between normal lung and body weight in female domestic piglets.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>177 healthy female domestic piglets from previous studies were included in the analysis. Lung weight was assessed either via a CT-scan before any experimental injury or with a scale after autopsy. The animals were randomly divided in a training (n = 141) and a validation population (n = 36). The relation between body weight and lung weight index (lung weight/body weight, g/kg) was described by an exponential function on the training population. The equation was tested on the validation population. A Bland-Altman analysis was performed to compare the lung weight index in the validation population and its theoretical value calculated with the reference equation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A good fit was found between the validation population and the exponential equation extracted from the training population (RMSE = 0.060). The equation to determine lung weight index from body weight was: [Formula: see text] At the Bland and Altman analyses, the mean bias between the real and the expected lung weight index was - 0.26 g/kg (95% CI - 0.96-0.43), upper LOA 3.80 g/kg [95% CI 2.59-5.01], lower LOA - 4.33 g/kg [95% CI = - 5.54-(- 3.12)].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This exponential function might be a valuable tool to assess lung edema in experiments involving 16-50 kg female domestic piglets. The error that can be made due to the 95% confidence intervals of the formula is smaller than the one made considering the lung to body weight as a linear relationship.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10811311/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-023-00591-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-023-00591-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介:在急性呼吸窘迫综合征和通气诱发肺损伤的猪实验中,肺重量是评估肺水肿的重要研究终点。关于肺与体重之间关系的文献缺乏证据。这项工作的目的是提供雌性家猪正常肺和体重之间的参考方程。在实验性损伤前通过 CT 扫描或在解剖后使用体重秤对肺重量进行评估。这些动物被随机分为训练组(n = 141)和验证组(n = 36)。在训练组中,体重与肺重量指数(肺重量/体重,克/千克)之间的关系用指数函数来描述。该方程在验证人群中进行了测试。进行了布兰-阿尔特曼分析,以比较验证人群的肺重量指数和用参考方程计算出的理论值:结果:验证人群与从训练人群中提取的指数方程之间拟合良好(RMSE = 0.060)。根据体重确定肺重量指数的公式为[公式:见正文] 在布兰德和阿尔特曼分析中,实际肺重量指数与预期肺重量指数之间的平均偏差为-0.26克/千克(95% CI - 0.96-0.43),LOA上限为3.80克/千克[95% CI 2.59-5.01],LOA下限为-4.33克/千克[95% CI = - 5.54-(- 3.12)]:在涉及 16-50 千克雌性家猪的实验中,该指数函数可能是评估肺水肿的重要工具。该公式的 95% 置信区间所产生的误差要小于将肺与体重视为线性关系所产生的误差。
Estimation of normal lung weight index in healthy female domestic pigs.
Introduction: Lung weight is an important study endpoint to assess lung edema in porcine experiments on acute respiratory distress syndrome and ventilatory induced lung injury. Evidence on the relationship between lung-body weight relationship is lacking in the literature. The aim of this work is to provide a reference equation between normal lung and body weight in female domestic piglets.
Materials and methods: 177 healthy female domestic piglets from previous studies were included in the analysis. Lung weight was assessed either via a CT-scan before any experimental injury or with a scale after autopsy. The animals were randomly divided in a training (n = 141) and a validation population (n = 36). The relation between body weight and lung weight index (lung weight/body weight, g/kg) was described by an exponential function on the training population. The equation was tested on the validation population. A Bland-Altman analysis was performed to compare the lung weight index in the validation population and its theoretical value calculated with the reference equation.
Results: A good fit was found between the validation population and the exponential equation extracted from the training population (RMSE = 0.060). The equation to determine lung weight index from body weight was: [Formula: see text] At the Bland and Altman analyses, the mean bias between the real and the expected lung weight index was - 0.26 g/kg (95% CI - 0.96-0.43), upper LOA 3.80 g/kg [95% CI 2.59-5.01], lower LOA - 4.33 g/kg [95% CI = - 5.54-(- 3.12)].
Conclusions: This exponential function might be a valuable tool to assess lung edema in experiments involving 16-50 kg female domestic piglets. The error that can be made due to the 95% confidence intervals of the formula is smaller than the one made considering the lung to body weight as a linear relationship.