三种印度语言的文盲阿登布鲁认知考试-III:改编和验证研究。

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Bidisha Bhattacharyya, Avanthi Paplikar, Feba Varghese, Gautam Das, Vasundhara Shukla, Faheem Arshad, Aakansha Gupta, Shailaja Mekala, Adreesh Mukherjee, Ruchira Mukherjee, Aparna Venugopal, Manjari Tripathi, Amitabha Ghosh, Atanu Biswas, Suvarna Alladi
{"title":"三种印度语言的文盲阿登布鲁认知考试-III:改编和验证研究。","authors":"Bidisha Bhattacharyya, Avanthi Paplikar, Feba Varghese, Gautam Das, Vasundhara Shukla, Faheem Arshad, Aakansha Gupta, Shailaja Mekala, Adreesh Mukherjee, Ruchira Mukherjee, Aparna Venugopal, Manjari Tripathi, Amitabha Ghosh, Atanu Biswas, Suvarna Alladi","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acad106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Literacy is an important factor that predicts cognitive performance. Existing cognitive screening tools are validated only in educated populations and are not appropriate for older adults with little or no education leading to poor performance on these tests and eventually leading to misdiagnosis. This challenge for clinicians necessitates a screening tool suitable for illiterate or low-literate older individuals.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective was to adapt and validate Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III) for screening general cognitive functions in illiterate and low-literate older populations in the Indian context in three languages.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Indian illiterate ACE-III was systematically adapted by modifying the original items of the Indian literate ACE-III to assess the cognitive functions of illiterates and low-literates with the consensus of an expert panel of professionals working in the area of dementia and related disorders. A total of 180 illiterate or low-literate participants (84 healthy-controls, 50 with dementia, and 46 with mild cognitive impairment [MCI]) were recruited from three different centers speaking Bengali, Hindi, and Kannada to validate the adapted version.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimal cut-off score for illiterate ACE-III to distinguish controls from dementia in all 3 languages was 75. The optimal cut-off scores in distinguishing between controls and MCI ranged from 79 to 82, with a sensitivity ranging from 93% to 99% and a specificity ranging from 72% to 99%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The test is found to have good psychometric properties and is a reliable cognitive screening tool for identifying dementia and MCI in older adults with low educational backgrounds in the Indian context.</p>","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"642-654"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Illiterate Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III in Three Indian Languages: An Adaptation and Validation Study.\",\"authors\":\"Bidisha Bhattacharyya, Avanthi Paplikar, Feba Varghese, Gautam Das, Vasundhara Shukla, Faheem Arshad, Aakansha Gupta, Shailaja Mekala, Adreesh Mukherjee, Ruchira Mukherjee, Aparna Venugopal, Manjari Tripathi, Amitabha Ghosh, Atanu Biswas, Suvarna Alladi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/arclin/acad106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Literacy is an important factor that predicts cognitive performance. Existing cognitive screening tools are validated only in educated populations and are not appropriate for older adults with little or no education leading to poor performance on these tests and eventually leading to misdiagnosis. This challenge for clinicians necessitates a screening tool suitable for illiterate or low-literate older individuals.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective was to adapt and validate Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III) for screening general cognitive functions in illiterate and low-literate older populations in the Indian context in three languages.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Indian illiterate ACE-III was systematically adapted by modifying the original items of the Indian literate ACE-III to assess the cognitive functions of illiterates and low-literates with the consensus of an expert panel of professionals working in the area of dementia and related disorders. A total of 180 illiterate or low-literate participants (84 healthy-controls, 50 with dementia, and 46 with mild cognitive impairment [MCI]) were recruited from three different centers speaking Bengali, Hindi, and Kannada to validate the adapted version.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimal cut-off score for illiterate ACE-III to distinguish controls from dementia in all 3 languages was 75. The optimal cut-off scores in distinguishing between controls and MCI ranged from 79 to 82, with a sensitivity ranging from 93% to 99% and a specificity ranging from 72% to 99%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The test is found to have good psychometric properties and is a reliable cognitive screening tool for identifying dementia and MCI in older adults with low educational backgrounds in the Indian context.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"642-654\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acad106\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acad106","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景识字是预测认知能力的一个重要因素。现有的认知筛查工具仅在受过教育的人群中得到验证,不适合受教育程度低或未受过教育的老年人,导致他们在这些测试中表现不佳,最终导致误诊。临床医生面临的这一挑战需要一种适合文盲或识字率低的老年人的筛查工具:目的:改编并验证 Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III),用三种语言筛查印度文盲和低文化老年人群的一般认知功能:印度文盲 ACE-III 是通过修改印度识字 ACE-III 的原始项目进行系统改编的,以评估文盲和低识字率人群的认知功能。我们从三个不同的中心招募了 180 名文盲或低识字率者(84 名健康对照者、50 名痴呆症患者和 46 名轻度认知障碍患者 [MCI]),他们分别讲孟加拉语、印地语和卡纳达语,对改编后的版本进行了验证:在所有 3 种语言中,文盲 ACE-III 区分对照组和痴呆症的最佳临界值为 75 分。区分对照组和 MCI 的最佳临界值在 79 到 82 之间,灵敏度在 93% 到 99% 之间,特异度在 72% 到 99% 之间:该测试具有良好的心理测量特性,是在印度环境下识别低教育背景老年人痴呆症和 MCI 的可靠认知筛查工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Illiterate Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III in Three Indian Languages: An Adaptation and Validation Study.

Background: Literacy is an important factor that predicts cognitive performance. Existing cognitive screening tools are validated only in educated populations and are not appropriate for older adults with little or no education leading to poor performance on these tests and eventually leading to misdiagnosis. This challenge for clinicians necessitates a screening tool suitable for illiterate or low-literate older individuals.

Objectives: The objective was to adapt and validate Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III) for screening general cognitive functions in illiterate and low-literate older populations in the Indian context in three languages.

Method: The Indian illiterate ACE-III was systematically adapted by modifying the original items of the Indian literate ACE-III to assess the cognitive functions of illiterates and low-literates with the consensus of an expert panel of professionals working in the area of dementia and related disorders. A total of 180 illiterate or low-literate participants (84 healthy-controls, 50 with dementia, and 46 with mild cognitive impairment [MCI]) were recruited from three different centers speaking Bengali, Hindi, and Kannada to validate the adapted version.

Results: The optimal cut-off score for illiterate ACE-III to distinguish controls from dementia in all 3 languages was 75. The optimal cut-off scores in distinguishing between controls and MCI ranged from 79 to 82, with a sensitivity ranging from 93% to 99% and a specificity ranging from 72% to 99%.

Conclusion: The test is found to have good psychometric properties and is a reliable cognitive screening tool for identifying dementia and MCI in older adults with low educational backgrounds in the Indian context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
358
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions dealing with psychological aspects of the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of disorders arising out of dysfunction of the central nervous system. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology will also consider manuscripts involving the established principles of the profession of neuropsychology: (a) delivery and evaluation of services, (b) ethical and legal issues, and (c) approaches to education and training. Preference will be given to empirical reports and key reviews. Brief research reports, case studies, and commentaries on published articles (not exceeding two printed pages) will also be considered. At the discretion of the editor, rebuttals to commentaries may be invited. Occasional papers of a theoretical nature will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信