经皮穴位电刺激有利于缓解卵母细胞提取术后疼痛:随机对照试验

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Li-ying Liu , Yang Su , Rong-rong Wang , Yuan-yuan Lai , Lei Huang , Yi-ting Li , Xin-yue Tao , Meng-hua Su , Xiao-yan Zheng , Shi-chen Huang , Yong-na Wu , Si-yi Yu , Fan-rong Liang , Jie Yang
{"title":"经皮穴位电刺激有利于缓解卵母细胞提取术后疼痛:随机对照试验","authors":"Li-ying Liu ,&nbsp;Yang Su ,&nbsp;Rong-rong Wang ,&nbsp;Yuan-yuan Lai ,&nbsp;Lei Huang ,&nbsp;Yi-ting Li ,&nbsp;Xin-yue Tao ,&nbsp;Meng-hua Su ,&nbsp;Xiao-yan Zheng ,&nbsp;Shi-chen Huang ,&nbsp;Yong-na Wu ,&nbsp;Si-yi Yu ,&nbsp;Fan-rong Liang ,&nbsp;Jie Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.joim.2024.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Transvaginal oocyte retrieval is frequently followed by adverse events related to anesthesia and the procedure. Some research showed that transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) can relieve intraoperative pain and postoperative nausea.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study examined whether TEAS can alleviate pain and relieve adverse symptoms after oocyte retrieval.</p></div><div><h3>Design, setting, participants and interventions</h3><p>Altogether 128 patients were randomly divided into the TEAS group and the mock TEAS group. The two groups received a 30-minute-long TEAS or mock TEAS treatment that began 30 min after oocyte retrieval.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>The primary outcome was the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score. Secondary outcomes were pressure pain threshold, McGill score, pain rating index (PRI), present pain intensity (PPI), VAS stress score, VAS anxiety score, and postoperative adverse symptoms.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). The VAS pain scores of the TEAS group were lower than those of the mock TEAS group at 60 and 90 min after oocyte retrieval (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). The McGill score, PRI and PPI in the TEAS group were significantly lower than those in the control group at 60 min after oocyte retrieval (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). However, the two groups had equivalent beneficial effects regarding the negative emotions, such as nervousness and anxiety (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). The TEAS group was superior to the mock TEAS group for relieving postoperative adverse symptoms (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>TEAS treatment can relieve postoperative pain and postoperative adverse symptoms for patients undergoing oocyte retrieval.</p><p>Please cite this article as: Liu LY, Su Y, Wang RR, Lai YY, Huang L, Li YT, Tao XY, Su MH, Zheng XY, Huang SC, Wu YN, Yu SY, Liang FR, Yang J. Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation benefits postoperative pain relief of oocyte retrieval: A randomized controlled trial. <em>J Integr Med</em>. 2024; 22(1): 32–38.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative Medicine-Jim","volume":"22 1","pages":"Pages 32-38"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation benefits postoperative pain relief of oocyte retrieval: A randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Li-ying Liu ,&nbsp;Yang Su ,&nbsp;Rong-rong Wang ,&nbsp;Yuan-yuan Lai ,&nbsp;Lei Huang ,&nbsp;Yi-ting Li ,&nbsp;Xin-yue Tao ,&nbsp;Meng-hua Su ,&nbsp;Xiao-yan Zheng ,&nbsp;Shi-chen Huang ,&nbsp;Yong-na Wu ,&nbsp;Si-yi Yu ,&nbsp;Fan-rong Liang ,&nbsp;Jie Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joim.2024.01.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Transvaginal oocyte retrieval is frequently followed by adverse events related to anesthesia and the procedure. Some research showed that transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) can relieve intraoperative pain and postoperative nausea.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study examined whether TEAS can alleviate pain and relieve adverse symptoms after oocyte retrieval.</p></div><div><h3>Design, setting, participants and interventions</h3><p>Altogether 128 patients were randomly divided into the TEAS group and the mock TEAS group. The two groups received a 30-minute-long TEAS or mock TEAS treatment that began 30 min after oocyte retrieval.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>The primary outcome was the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score. Secondary outcomes were pressure pain threshold, McGill score, pain rating index (PRI), present pain intensity (PPI), VAS stress score, VAS anxiety score, and postoperative adverse symptoms.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). The VAS pain scores of the TEAS group were lower than those of the mock TEAS group at 60 and 90 min after oocyte retrieval (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). The McGill score, PRI and PPI in the TEAS group were significantly lower than those in the control group at 60 min after oocyte retrieval (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). However, the two groups had equivalent beneficial effects regarding the negative emotions, such as nervousness and anxiety (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). The TEAS group was superior to the mock TEAS group for relieving postoperative adverse symptoms (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>TEAS treatment can relieve postoperative pain and postoperative adverse symptoms for patients undergoing oocyte retrieval.</p><p>Please cite this article as: Liu LY, Su Y, Wang RR, Lai YY, Huang L, Li YT, Tao XY, Su MH, Zheng XY, Huang SC, Wu YN, Yu SY, Liang FR, Yang J. Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation benefits postoperative pain relief of oocyte retrieval: A randomized controlled trial. <em>J Integr Med</em>. 2024; 22(1): 32–38.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Integrative Medicine-Jim\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 32-38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Integrative Medicine-Jim\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095496424000050\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative Medicine-Jim","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095496424000050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景经阴道取卵经常会出现与麻醉和手术相关的不良反应。一些研究表明,经皮穴位电刺激(TEAS)可缓解术中疼痛和术后恶心。本研究探讨了经皮穴位电刺激能否减轻疼痛并缓解卵母细胞取卵术后的不良症状:共 128 名患者被随机分为 TEAS 组和模拟 TEAS 组。两组患者在取卵后 30 分钟开始接受长达 30 分钟的 TEAS 或模拟 TEAS 治疗:主要结果是视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分。次要结果为压痛阈值、麦吉尔评分、疼痛评级指数(PRI)、当前疼痛强度(PPI)、VAS 压力评分、VAS 焦虑评分和术后不良症状。结果两组的基线特征具有可比性(P > 0.05)。取卵后 60 分钟和 90 分钟,TEAS 组的 VAS 疼痛评分低于模拟 TEAS 组(P < 0.05)。在取卵后 60 分钟,TEAS 组的 McGill 评分、PRI 和 PPI 明显低于对照组(P < 0.05)。然而,两组对紧张和焦虑等负面情绪的有益效果相当(P >0.05)。TEAS组在缓解术后不良症状方面优于模拟TEAS组(P <0.05):试验注册号:ChiCTR2100050153。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation benefits postoperative pain relief of oocyte retrieval: A randomized controlled trial

Background

Transvaginal oocyte retrieval is frequently followed by adverse events related to anesthesia and the procedure. Some research showed that transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) can relieve intraoperative pain and postoperative nausea.

Objective

This study examined whether TEAS can alleviate pain and relieve adverse symptoms after oocyte retrieval.

Design, setting, participants and interventions

Altogether 128 patients were randomly divided into the TEAS group and the mock TEAS group. The two groups received a 30-minute-long TEAS or mock TEAS treatment that began 30 min after oocyte retrieval.

Main outcome measures

The primary outcome was the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score. Secondary outcomes were pressure pain threshold, McGill score, pain rating index (PRI), present pain intensity (PPI), VAS stress score, VAS anxiety score, and postoperative adverse symptoms.

Results

The baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable (P > 0.05). The VAS pain scores of the TEAS group were lower than those of the mock TEAS group at 60 and 90 min after oocyte retrieval (P < 0.05). The McGill score, PRI and PPI in the TEAS group were significantly lower than those in the control group at 60 min after oocyte retrieval (P < 0.05). However, the two groups had equivalent beneficial effects regarding the negative emotions, such as nervousness and anxiety (P > 0.05). The TEAS group was superior to the mock TEAS group for relieving postoperative adverse symptoms (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

TEAS treatment can relieve postoperative pain and postoperative adverse symptoms for patients undergoing oocyte retrieval.

Please cite this article as: Liu LY, Su Y, Wang RR, Lai YY, Huang L, Li YT, Tao XY, Su MH, Zheng XY, Huang SC, Wu YN, Yu SY, Liang FR, Yang J. Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation benefits postoperative pain relief of oocyte retrieval: A randomized controlled trial. J Integr Med. 2024; 22(1): 32–38.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Integrative Medicine-Jim
Journal of Integrative Medicine-Jim Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
4.20%
发文量
3319
期刊介绍: The predecessor of JIM is the Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine (Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao). With this new, English-language publication, we are committed to make JIM an international platform for publishing high-quality papers on complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and an open forum in which the different professions and international scholarly communities can exchange views, share research and their clinical experience, discuss CAM education, and confer about issues and problems in our various disciplines and in CAM as a whole in order to promote integrative medicine. JIM is indexed/abstracted in: MEDLINE/PubMed, ScienceDirect, Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Scopus, Embase, Chemical Abstracts (CA), CAB Abstracts, EBSCO, WPRIM, JST China, Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). JIM Editorial Office uses ThomsonReuters ScholarOne Manuscripts as submitting and review system (submission link: http://mc03.manuscriptcentral.com/jcim-en). JIM is published bimonthly. Manuscripts submitted to JIM should be written in English. Article types include but are not limited to randomized controlled and pragmatic trials, translational and patient-centered effectiveness outcome studies, case series and reports, clinical trial protocols, preclinical and basic science studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, papers on methodology and CAM history or education, conference proceedings, editorials, commentaries, short communications, book reviews, and letters to the editor. Our purpose is to publish a prestigious international journal for studies in integrative medicine. To achieve this aim, we seek to publish high-quality papers on any aspects of integrative medicine, such as acupuncture and traditional Chinese medicine, Ayurveda medicine, herbal medicine, homeopathy, nutrition, chiropractic, mind-body medicine, taichi, qigong, meditation, and any other modalities of CAM; our commitment to international scope ensures that research and progress from all regions of the world are widely covered. These ensure that articles published in JIM have the maximum exposure to the international scholarly community. JIM can help its authors let their papers reach the widest possible range of readers, and let all those who share an interest in their research field be concerned with their study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信