"他们需要为孩子们提供更多的计划:"在经济不稳定和项目繁重的情况下,低收入母亲对政府的看法

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q3 SOCIAL WORK
Carolyn Y. Barnes, Sarah Halpern-Meekin, Jill Hoiting
{"title":"\"他们需要为孩子们提供更多的计划:\"在经济不稳定和项目繁重的情况下,低收入母亲对政府的看法","authors":"Carolyn Y. Barnes,&nbsp;Sarah Halpern-Meekin,&nbsp;Jill Hoiting","doi":"10.1111/ijsw.12641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Policy feedback scholars argue that experiences with government shape political participation. Administrative burden scholars posit that burdensome bureaucratic encounters deter political participation. Related quantitative studies take a top-down, deductive approach and test effects of single policies, yet people engage multiple programs, and all policies may not be equally salient in how they view the state. Using qualitative interviews, our inductive, “bottom-up” approach examines the most prominent policy domains in views of government shared across mothers with low incomes in the United States (<i>n</i> = 80). Mothers experienced a wide range of policies, and they detailed related administrative burdens, but this was not the focus in most of their views of the government. Many raised issue areas that hit close to home, such as affordable child care or children's recreation programs. They often drew on a sense of collective motherhood in their view of government, including how it could facilitate efforts to raise children.</p>","PeriodicalId":47567,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Welfare","volume":"33 4","pages":"846-857"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijsw.12641","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“They need more programs for the kids:” Low-income mothers' views of government amidst economic precarity and burdensome programs\",\"authors\":\"Carolyn Y. Barnes,&nbsp;Sarah Halpern-Meekin,&nbsp;Jill Hoiting\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijsw.12641\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Policy feedback scholars argue that experiences with government shape political participation. Administrative burden scholars posit that burdensome bureaucratic encounters deter political participation. Related quantitative studies take a top-down, deductive approach and test effects of single policies, yet people engage multiple programs, and all policies may not be equally salient in how they view the state. Using qualitative interviews, our inductive, “bottom-up” approach examines the most prominent policy domains in views of government shared across mothers with low incomes in the United States (<i>n</i> = 80). Mothers experienced a wide range of policies, and they detailed related administrative burdens, but this was not the focus in most of their views of the government. Many raised issue areas that hit close to home, such as affordable child care or children's recreation programs. They often drew on a sense of collective motherhood in their view of government, including how it could facilitate efforts to raise children.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Social Welfare\",\"volume\":\"33 4\",\"pages\":\"846-857\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijsw.12641\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Social Welfare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijsw.12641\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Welfare","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijsw.12641","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

政策反馈学者认为,与政府打交道的经历决定了政治参与。行政负担学者认为,繁琐的官僚作风会阻碍政治参与。相关的定量研究采用自上而下的演绎法,测试单一政策的效果,但人们会参与多个项目,而且在他们如何看待国家的问题上,所有政策的重要性可能不尽相同。我们采用定性访谈的归纳式 "自下而上 "方法,研究了美国低收入母亲(n = 80)对政府的看法中最突出的政策领域。母亲们经历了各种各样的政策,她们详细描述了相关的行政负担,但这并不是她们对政府看法的重点。许多人提出了贴近家庭的问题领域,如负担得起的儿童保育或儿童娱乐项目。他们在对政府的看法中经常会提到集体母爱意识,包括政府如何能够促进养育子女的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“They need more programs for the kids:” Low-income mothers' views of government amidst economic precarity and burdensome programs

Policy feedback scholars argue that experiences with government shape political participation. Administrative burden scholars posit that burdensome bureaucratic encounters deter political participation. Related quantitative studies take a top-down, deductive approach and test effects of single policies, yet people engage multiple programs, and all policies may not be equally salient in how they view the state. Using qualitative interviews, our inductive, “bottom-up” approach examines the most prominent policy domains in views of government shared across mothers with low incomes in the United States (n = 80). Mothers experienced a wide range of policies, and they detailed related administrative burdens, but this was not the focus in most of their views of the government. Many raised issue areas that hit close to home, such as affordable child care or children's recreation programs. They often drew on a sense of collective motherhood in their view of government, including how it could facilitate efforts to raise children.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Social Welfare publishes original articles in English on social welfare and social work. Its interdisciplinary approach and comparative perspective promote examination of the most pressing social welfare issues of the day by researchers from the various branches of the applied social sciences. The journal seeks to disseminate knowledge and to encourage debate about these issues and their regional and global implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信