利用 eDNA 和附近的海洋保护区为海港鱼类生物多样性设定基准

IF 7.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Stéphanie Manel, Laetitia Mathon, David Mouillot, Morgane Bruno, Alice Valentini, Gilles Lecaillon, Anais Gudefin, Julie Deter, Pierre Boissery, Alicia Dalongeville
{"title":"利用 eDNA 和附近的海洋保护区为海港鱼类生物多样性设定基准","authors":"Stéphanie Manel,&nbsp;Laetitia Mathon,&nbsp;David Mouillot,&nbsp;Morgane Bruno,&nbsp;Alice Valentini,&nbsp;Gilles Lecaillon,&nbsp;Anais Gudefin,&nbsp;Julie Deter,&nbsp;Pierre Boissery,&nbsp;Alicia Dalongeville","doi":"10.1111/conl.13001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Coastal areas offer a diversity of habitats providing refugia and nursery for fish, promoting their biodiversity and associated contributions to people. Yet, natural coastlines are replaced by artificial infrastructures such as seaports and the influence of this artificialization on fish biodiversity remains poorly known. Here, we assessed fish biodiversity indicators using environmental DNA metabarcoding inside seaports and adjacent natural habitats including no-take marine reserves. We found that species assemblages within seaports were primarily influenced by their area and habitat. We detected a similar species richness in seaports and reserves during lockdown, but seaports host more threatened species than natural habitats. Yet, species turnover between seaports was lower than between natural areas, reflecting biotic homogenization. Seaport managers should consider that complexifying artificial infrastructures could increase habitat diversity and coastal fish biodiversity. Our study illustrates that eDNA-based indicators can be integrated in management and policy applications toward greener marine artificial infrastructures.</p>","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/conl.13001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benchmarking fish biodiversity of seaports with eDNA and nearby marine reserves\",\"authors\":\"Stéphanie Manel,&nbsp;Laetitia Mathon,&nbsp;David Mouillot,&nbsp;Morgane Bruno,&nbsp;Alice Valentini,&nbsp;Gilles Lecaillon,&nbsp;Anais Gudefin,&nbsp;Julie Deter,&nbsp;Pierre Boissery,&nbsp;Alicia Dalongeville\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/conl.13001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Coastal areas offer a diversity of habitats providing refugia and nursery for fish, promoting their biodiversity and associated contributions to people. Yet, natural coastlines are replaced by artificial infrastructures such as seaports and the influence of this artificialization on fish biodiversity remains poorly known. Here, we assessed fish biodiversity indicators using environmental DNA metabarcoding inside seaports and adjacent natural habitats including no-take marine reserves. We found that species assemblages within seaports were primarily influenced by their area and habitat. We detected a similar species richness in seaports and reserves during lockdown, but seaports host more threatened species than natural habitats. Yet, species turnover between seaports was lower than between natural areas, reflecting biotic homogenization. Seaport managers should consider that complexifying artificial infrastructures could increase habitat diversity and coastal fish biodiversity. Our study illustrates that eDNA-based indicators can be integrated in management and policy applications toward greener marine artificial infrastructures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conservation Letters\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/conl.13001\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conservation Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/conl.13001\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/conl.13001","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

沿海地区提供了多种多样的栖息地,为鱼类提供了栖息地和育苗场,促进了鱼类的生物多样性,并为人类做出了相关贡献。然而,天然海岸线被海港等人工基础设施所取代,这种人工化对鱼类生物多样性的影响仍鲜为人知。在这里,我们利用环境 DNA 代谢编码技术评估了海港和邻近自然栖息地(包括禁渔海洋保护区)内的鱼类生物多样性指标。我们发现,海港内的物种组合主要受其面积和栖息地的影响。在封锁期间,我们在海港和保护区内发现了相似的物种丰富度,但海港比自然栖息地容纳了更多濒危物种。然而,海港之间的物种更替率低于自然区域之间的物种更替率,这反映了生物的同质性。海港管理者应考虑将人工基础设施复杂化,以增加栖息地多样性和沿海鱼类生物多样性。我们的研究表明,基于 eDNA 的指标可被纳入管理和政策应用中,以实现更环保的海洋人工基础设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Benchmarking fish biodiversity of seaports with eDNA and nearby marine reserves

Benchmarking fish biodiversity of seaports with eDNA and nearby marine reserves

Coastal areas offer a diversity of habitats providing refugia and nursery for fish, promoting their biodiversity and associated contributions to people. Yet, natural coastlines are replaced by artificial infrastructures such as seaports and the influence of this artificialization on fish biodiversity remains poorly known. Here, we assessed fish biodiversity indicators using environmental DNA metabarcoding inside seaports and adjacent natural habitats including no-take marine reserves. We found that species assemblages within seaports were primarily influenced by their area and habitat. We detected a similar species richness in seaports and reserves during lockdown, but seaports host more threatened species than natural habitats. Yet, species turnover between seaports was lower than between natural areas, reflecting biotic homogenization. Seaport managers should consider that complexifying artificial infrastructures could increase habitat diversity and coastal fish biodiversity. Our study illustrates that eDNA-based indicators can be integrated in management and policy applications toward greener marine artificial infrastructures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Conservation Letters
Conservation Letters BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
70
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Conservation Letters is a reputable scientific journal that is devoted to the publication of both empirical and theoretical research that has important implications for the conservation of biological diversity. The journal warmly invites submissions from various disciplines within the biological and social sciences, with a particular interest in interdisciplinary work. The primary aim is to advance both pragmatic conservation objectives and scientific knowledge. Manuscripts are subject to a rapid communication schedule, therefore they should address current and relevant topics. Research articles should effectively communicate the significance of their findings in relation to conservation policy and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信