Jessica L. Betancourt , R. Matt Alderson , Delanie K. Roberts , Caitlin C. Bullard
{"title":"患有和未患有注意力缺陷/多动症的儿童和青少年的自尊:荟萃分析综述","authors":"Jessica L. Betancourt , R. Matt Alderson , Delanie K. Roberts , Caitlin C. Bullard","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Meta-analytic methods were used to examine global and domain-specific (i.e., academic, social, behavioral) self-esteem in children and adolescents with and without ADHD. Potential moderators of effect size heterogeneity were also examined via meta-regressions within a three-level approach. Findings from 49 aggregated global self-esteem effect sizes (ADHD<sub><em>N</em></sub> = 2500, TD<sub><em>N</em></sub> = 9448), 12 academic self-esteem effect sizes (ADHD<sub><em>N</em></sub> = 386, TD<sub><em>N</em></sub> = 315), 11 social self-esteem effect sizes (ADHD<sub><em>N</em></sub> = 258, TD<sub><em>N</em></sub> = 254), and 8 behavioral self-esteem effect sizes (ADHD<sub><em>N</em></sub> = 231, TD<sub><em>N</em></sub> = 211) suggest that children and adolescents with ADHD experience moderate global (<em>ES</em> = 0.46, <em>p</em> < .001), academic (<em>ES</em> = 0.60, <em>p</em> = .009), and social (<em>ES</em> = 0.67, <em>p</em> = .001) self-esteem impairments compared to children and adolescents without the disorder. The aggregated behavioral self-esteem effect size (<em>ES</em> = 0.20, <em>p</em> = .54), however, was not significant, and the global self-esteem effect size was markedly smaller compared to effect sizes for the academic and social domains. Further, examination of potential moderators of effect size heterogeneity indicated null effects for medication status, diagnostic complexity, informant, age, sex, comorbid psychopathology, and self-esteem dimension. Collectively, findings suggest that children and adolescents with ADHD do not hold a ubiquitous negative self-perception of difficulties across academic, social, and behavioral domains of functioning, and unexamined domains that are distal to ADHD may serve to bolster global self-esteem.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 102394"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-esteem in children and adolescents with and without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A meta-analytic review\",\"authors\":\"Jessica L. Betancourt , R. Matt Alderson , Delanie K. Roberts , Caitlin C. Bullard\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Meta-analytic methods were used to examine global and domain-specific (i.e., academic, social, behavioral) self-esteem in children and adolescents with and without ADHD. Potential moderators of effect size heterogeneity were also examined via meta-regressions within a three-level approach. Findings from 49 aggregated global self-esteem effect sizes (ADHD<sub><em>N</em></sub> = 2500, TD<sub><em>N</em></sub> = 9448), 12 academic self-esteem effect sizes (ADHD<sub><em>N</em></sub> = 386, TD<sub><em>N</em></sub> = 315), 11 social self-esteem effect sizes (ADHD<sub><em>N</em></sub> = 258, TD<sub><em>N</em></sub> = 254), and 8 behavioral self-esteem effect sizes (ADHD<sub><em>N</em></sub> = 231, TD<sub><em>N</em></sub> = 211) suggest that children and adolescents with ADHD experience moderate global (<em>ES</em> = 0.46, <em>p</em> < .001), academic (<em>ES</em> = 0.60, <em>p</em> = .009), and social (<em>ES</em> = 0.67, <em>p</em> = .001) self-esteem impairments compared to children and adolescents without the disorder. The aggregated behavioral self-esteem effect size (<em>ES</em> = 0.20, <em>p</em> = .54), however, was not significant, and the global self-esteem effect size was markedly smaller compared to effect sizes for the academic and social domains. Further, examination of potential moderators of effect size heterogeneity indicated null effects for medication status, diagnostic complexity, informant, age, sex, comorbid psychopathology, and self-esteem dimension. Collectively, findings suggest that children and adolescents with ADHD do not hold a ubiquitous negative self-perception of difficulties across academic, social, and behavioral domains of functioning, and unexamined domains that are distal to ADHD may serve to bolster global self-esteem.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Psychology Review\",\"volume\":\"108 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102394\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Psychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824000151\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824000151","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Self-esteem in children and adolescents with and without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A meta-analytic review
Meta-analytic methods were used to examine global and domain-specific (i.e., academic, social, behavioral) self-esteem in children and adolescents with and without ADHD. Potential moderators of effect size heterogeneity were also examined via meta-regressions within a three-level approach. Findings from 49 aggregated global self-esteem effect sizes (ADHDN = 2500, TDN = 9448), 12 academic self-esteem effect sizes (ADHDN = 386, TDN = 315), 11 social self-esteem effect sizes (ADHDN = 258, TDN = 254), and 8 behavioral self-esteem effect sizes (ADHDN = 231, TDN = 211) suggest that children and adolescents with ADHD experience moderate global (ES = 0.46, p < .001), academic (ES = 0.60, p = .009), and social (ES = 0.67, p = .001) self-esteem impairments compared to children and adolescents without the disorder. The aggregated behavioral self-esteem effect size (ES = 0.20, p = .54), however, was not significant, and the global self-esteem effect size was markedly smaller compared to effect sizes for the academic and social domains. Further, examination of potential moderators of effect size heterogeneity indicated null effects for medication status, diagnostic complexity, informant, age, sex, comorbid psychopathology, and self-esteem dimension. Collectively, findings suggest that children and adolescents with ADHD do not hold a ubiquitous negative self-perception of difficulties across academic, social, and behavioral domains of functioning, and unexamined domains that are distal to ADHD may serve to bolster global self-esteem.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology.
While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.