真理、视角主义和关于健康的科学知识

Q3 Medicine
J.G. Kahambing
{"title":"真理、视角主义和关于健康的科学知识","authors":"J.G. Kahambing","doi":"10.1016/j.jemep.2023.100964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This paper responds to an essay in the journal that talks about the challenges and consequent criteria in dealing with truth, which is claimed to be absolute. The target essay hinges on Aristotelian and Platonic logical principles as criteria to argue for a real scientific discourse in the Covid-19 pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>The paper utilizes theoretical critique.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Scientific knowledge about public health is not about absolute truth but the latest justifications. Truth could at best be a commitment to a perspective, which scientism's verificationist principles are not entirely concerned about.</p></div><div><h3>Perspectives</h3><p>In aligning with perspectivism about truth, one does not necessarily relapse to relativism. That there are different Covid-19 reports does not mean that they are lies or distortions to a necessary absolute truth.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37707,"journal":{"name":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 100964"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Truth, perspectivism, and scientific knowledge on health\",\"authors\":\"J.G. Kahambing\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jemep.2023.100964\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This paper responds to an essay in the journal that talks about the challenges and consequent criteria in dealing with truth, which is claimed to be absolute. The target essay hinges on Aristotelian and Platonic logical principles as criteria to argue for a real scientific discourse in the Covid-19 pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>The paper utilizes theoretical critique.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Scientific knowledge about public health is not about absolute truth but the latest justifications. Truth could at best be a commitment to a perspective, which scientism's verificationist principles are not entirely concerned about.</p></div><div><h3>Perspectives</h3><p>In aligning with perspectivism about truth, one does not necessarily relapse to relativism. That there are different Covid-19 reports does not mean that they are lies or distortions to a necessary absolute truth.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health\",\"volume\":\"32 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100964\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552523000956\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552523000956","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景本文回应了杂志上的一篇文章,该文章谈到了在处理声称是绝对真理的真理时所面临的挑战和随之而来的标准。目标文章以亚里士多德和柏拉图的逻辑原则为标准,论证了在科维德-19 大流行病中真正的科学话语。真理充其量不过是对一种观点的承诺,而科学主义的验证主义原则并不完全关注这一点。有不同的 Covid-19 报告并不意味着它们是谎言或对必要的绝对真理的歪曲。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Truth, perspectivism, and scientific knowledge on health

Background

This paper responds to an essay in the journal that talks about the challenges and consequent criteria in dealing with truth, which is claimed to be absolute. The target essay hinges on Aristotelian and Platonic logical principles as criteria to argue for a real scientific discourse in the Covid-19 pandemic.

Methodology

The paper utilizes theoretical critique.

Discussion

Scientific knowledge about public health is not about absolute truth but the latest justifications. Truth could at best be a commitment to a perspective, which scientism's verificationist principles are not entirely concerned about.

Perspectives

In aligning with perspectivism about truth, one does not necessarily relapse to relativism. That there are different Covid-19 reports does not mean that they are lies or distortions to a necessary absolute truth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: This review aims to compare approaches to medical ethics and bioethics in two forms, Anglo-Saxon (Ethics, Medicine and Public Health) and French (Ethique, Médecine et Politiques Publiques). Thus, in their native languages, the authors will present research on the legitimacy of the practice and appreciation of the consequences of acts towards patients as compared to the limits acceptable by the community, as illustrated by the democratic debate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信