严重肺气肿患者应用支气管镜肺容积缩小线圈的效率和可靠性

IF 1 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital Pub Date : 2023-12-29 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.14744/SEMB.2023.06767
Hazal Kayikci, Pinar Cimen, Nuran Katgi
{"title":"严重肺气肿患者应用支气管镜肺容积缩小线圈的效率和可靠性","authors":"Hazal Kayikci, Pinar Cimen, Nuran Katgi","doi":"10.14744/SEMB.2023.06767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In the past years, surgery has been used for the non-medical treatment of severe emphysema. However, in recent years, bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (LVR) treatment has become more preferred because it is less invasive. Bronchoscopic coil treatment is the most frequently applied technique among these methods. The aim of the investigation was to determine the efficacy and safety of bronchoscopic volume reduction coil treatment for patients with severe emphysema.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The patients who were performed bronchial volume reduction coil treatment between 2015 and 2017 and were followed in our outpatient clinic were retrospectively examined. They were followed for 1 year at quarterly intervals after the procedure. All the safety and efficacy of the patient's records, including the modified Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnea score, the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) quality of life scale, the 6 min walk distance (6-MWT), pulmonary function tests, and adverse events, were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen patients were included in the study. The mean of the preoperative mMRC clinic dyspnea score was 3.38, the mean of the 3rd month's mMRC score was 2.62 (p=0.007), and the mean of the 12th month's mMRC was 2.37 (p=0.003). The preoperative SGRQ quality of life parameter was 71.95±15.7, the 3<sup>rd</sup> month was 66.7±16.2 (p=0.007), and the 12<sup>th</sup> month was 62.9±16.4 (p=0.003). Preoperative mean of 6-MWT was 247.25±112.36 m, 3<sup>rd</sup> month 264.25±95 m (p=0.148), and 12<sup>th</sup> month 317±122.9 m (p=0.034). Patients' preoperative residual volume was 5.28±1.96 L, 3<sup>rd</sup> month 4.52±1.35 L (p=0.023), and 12<sup>th</sup> month 4.545±1.83 L (p=0.163). Patients' preoperative forced expiratory volume in one second, respectively, was 0.79±0.29 L, 3<sup>rd</sup> month 0.79±0.3 L (p=0.917), and 12<sup>th</sup> month 0.86±0.3 L (p=0.756).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It seems that bronchoscopic LVR coil treatment, which is an effective and reliable procedure that reduces shortness of breath rather than respiratory function test parameters and improves the quality of daily life, will become even more widespread.</p>","PeriodicalId":42218,"journal":{"name":"Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital","volume":"57 4","pages":"506-512"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10805047/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency and Reliability of Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction Coil Application in Patients with Severe Emphysema.\",\"authors\":\"Hazal Kayikci, Pinar Cimen, Nuran Katgi\",\"doi\":\"10.14744/SEMB.2023.06767\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In the past years, surgery has been used for the non-medical treatment of severe emphysema. However, in recent years, bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (LVR) treatment has become more preferred because it is less invasive. Bronchoscopic coil treatment is the most frequently applied technique among these methods. The aim of the investigation was to determine the efficacy and safety of bronchoscopic volume reduction coil treatment for patients with severe emphysema.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The patients who were performed bronchial volume reduction coil treatment between 2015 and 2017 and were followed in our outpatient clinic were retrospectively examined. They were followed for 1 year at quarterly intervals after the procedure. All the safety and efficacy of the patient's records, including the modified Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnea score, the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) quality of life scale, the 6 min walk distance (6-MWT), pulmonary function tests, and adverse events, were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen patients were included in the study. The mean of the preoperative mMRC clinic dyspnea score was 3.38, the mean of the 3rd month's mMRC score was 2.62 (p=0.007), and the mean of the 12th month's mMRC was 2.37 (p=0.003). The preoperative SGRQ quality of life parameter was 71.95±15.7, the 3<sup>rd</sup> month was 66.7±16.2 (p=0.007), and the 12<sup>th</sup> month was 62.9±16.4 (p=0.003). Preoperative mean of 6-MWT was 247.25±112.36 m, 3<sup>rd</sup> month 264.25±95 m (p=0.148), and 12<sup>th</sup> month 317±122.9 m (p=0.034). Patients' preoperative residual volume was 5.28±1.96 L, 3<sup>rd</sup> month 4.52±1.35 L (p=0.023), and 12<sup>th</sup> month 4.545±1.83 L (p=0.163). Patients' preoperative forced expiratory volume in one second, respectively, was 0.79±0.29 L, 3<sup>rd</sup> month 0.79±0.3 L (p=0.917), and 12<sup>th</sup> month 0.86±0.3 L (p=0.756).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It seems that bronchoscopic LVR coil treatment, which is an effective and reliable procedure that reduces shortness of breath rather than respiratory function test parameters and improves the quality of daily life, will become even more widespread.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital\",\"volume\":\"57 4\",\"pages\":\"506-512\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10805047/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14744/SEMB.2023.06767\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/SEMB.2023.06767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在过去几年中,手术一直被用于严重肺气肿的非药物治疗。然而,近年来,支气管镜肺容积缩小(LVR)治疗因其创伤较小而更受青睐。支气管镜下线圈治疗是这些方法中最常用的技术。本研究旨在确定支气管镜下肺容积缩小线圈治疗对重度肺气肿患者的有效性和安全性:回顾性研究2015年至2017年间接受支气管减容线圈治疗并在我院门诊随访的患者。术后每季度随访一次,为期一年。对患者记录的所有安全性和有效性进行了评估,包括改良医学研究委员会(MRC)呼吸困难评分、圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)生活质量量表、6分钟步行距离(6-MWT)、肺功能测试和不良事件:研究共纳入 16 名患者。术前 mMRC 临床呼吸困难评分平均值为 3.38,第 3 个月的 mMRC 评分平均值为 2.62(P=0.007),第 12 个月的 mMRC 评分平均值为 2.37(P=0.003)。术前 SGRQ 生活质量参数为 71.95±15.7,第 3 个月为 66.7±16.2(P=0.007),第 12 个月为 62.9±16.4(P=0.003)。术前 6-MWT 平均值为 247.25±112.36 m,第 3 个月为 264.25±95 m(P=0.148),第 12 个月为 317±122.9 m(P=0.034)。患者术前残气量为 5.28±1.96L,第 3 个月为 4.52±1.35L(P=0.023),第 12 个月为 4.545±1.83L(P=0.163)。患者术前一秒用力呼气容积分别为0.79±0.29 L,第3个月为0.79±0.3 L(P=0.917),第12个月为0.86±0.3 L(P=0.756):看来,支气管镜下 LVR 线圈治疗是一种有效、可靠的治疗方法,可减轻呼吸急促,而非呼吸功能检测指标,并可改善日常生活质量,这种治疗方法将得到更广泛的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficiency and Reliability of Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction Coil Application in Patients with Severe Emphysema.

Objectives: In the past years, surgery has been used for the non-medical treatment of severe emphysema. However, in recent years, bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (LVR) treatment has become more preferred because it is less invasive. Bronchoscopic coil treatment is the most frequently applied technique among these methods. The aim of the investigation was to determine the efficacy and safety of bronchoscopic volume reduction coil treatment for patients with severe emphysema.

Methods: The patients who were performed bronchial volume reduction coil treatment between 2015 and 2017 and were followed in our outpatient clinic were retrospectively examined. They were followed for 1 year at quarterly intervals after the procedure. All the safety and efficacy of the patient's records, including the modified Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnea score, the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) quality of life scale, the 6 min walk distance (6-MWT), pulmonary function tests, and adverse events, were evaluated.

Results: Sixteen patients were included in the study. The mean of the preoperative mMRC clinic dyspnea score was 3.38, the mean of the 3rd month's mMRC score was 2.62 (p=0.007), and the mean of the 12th month's mMRC was 2.37 (p=0.003). The preoperative SGRQ quality of life parameter was 71.95±15.7, the 3rd month was 66.7±16.2 (p=0.007), and the 12th month was 62.9±16.4 (p=0.003). Preoperative mean of 6-MWT was 247.25±112.36 m, 3rd month 264.25±95 m (p=0.148), and 12th month 317±122.9 m (p=0.034). Patients' preoperative residual volume was 5.28±1.96 L, 3rd month 4.52±1.35 L (p=0.023), and 12th month 4.545±1.83 L (p=0.163). Patients' preoperative forced expiratory volume in one second, respectively, was 0.79±0.29 L, 3rd month 0.79±0.3 L (p=0.917), and 12th month 0.86±0.3 L (p=0.756).

Conclusion: It seems that bronchoscopic LVR coil treatment, which is an effective and reliable procedure that reduces shortness of breath rather than respiratory function test parameters and improves the quality of daily life, will become even more widespread.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital
Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
16.70%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信