影响医学系学生反思性思维和临床决策能力水平的因素。

IF 1 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital Pub Date : 2023-12-29 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.14744/SEMB.2023.52223
Aysenur Meric Hafiz, Erol Senturk, Cenk Teker, Ozlem Sarikaya
{"title":"影响医学系学生反思性思维和临床决策能力水平的因素。","authors":"Aysenur Meric Hafiz, Erol Senturk, Cenk Teker, Ozlem Sarikaya","doi":"10.14744/SEMB.2023.52223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study is to evaluate the reflection skills of students at the Faculty of Medicine and the factors influencing these skills, as well as to measure the impact of students' reflection skills on their clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is an educational research project conducted on fifth-year Ear Nose Throat (ENT) interns at Vakif University's Faculty of Medicine. The \"Reflective Thinking Level Determination Scale\" and the \"Clinical Decision-Making Scale,\" which are valid and reliable, were used to assess the reflection skills and clinical decision-making abilities of the 125 students participating in the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our study, the mean score of the sub-dimensions of the Groningen Reflection Skills Scale was 77.04±5.14 for the fifth-year student population surveyed. Scores from the \"Self-Reflection\" and \"Reflective Communication\" sub-dimensions of the Groningen Reflection Skills Scale were compared based on gender, participation in summer internships, receipt of scholarships, membership in social sciences clubs, place of residence, school attended, diary-keeping habits, study styles, and cities of residence. Although there were some differences between the groups, these differences were not statistically significant. The total scores of the students on the Clinical Decision-Making Scale sub-dimensions ranged from 98 to 169, with a mean score of 146.18±10.97. A statistically positive and moderate correlation was found between the total scores of the participants on the Groningen Reflection Skills Scale and the total scores they obtained on the Clinical Decision-Making Scale (r=0.403; p=0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Consequently, an increase in the reflection skills of participants is associated with higher clinical decision-making scores. Reflection is the primary means of transitioning students from novices to experts, enhancing both comprehensive learning and learning experiences. Therefore, every medical school should develop a training program for student reflection, along with a feedback and assessment system integrated into the curriculum.</p>","PeriodicalId":42218,"journal":{"name":"Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital","volume":"57 4","pages":"543-551"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10805058/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Affecting the Level of Reflective Thinking and Clinical Decision-Making Skills in Medical Faculty Students.\",\"authors\":\"Aysenur Meric Hafiz, Erol Senturk, Cenk Teker, Ozlem Sarikaya\",\"doi\":\"10.14744/SEMB.2023.52223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study is to evaluate the reflection skills of students at the Faculty of Medicine and the factors influencing these skills, as well as to measure the impact of students' reflection skills on their clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is an educational research project conducted on fifth-year Ear Nose Throat (ENT) interns at Vakif University's Faculty of Medicine. The \\\"Reflective Thinking Level Determination Scale\\\" and the \\\"Clinical Decision-Making Scale,\\\" which are valid and reliable, were used to assess the reflection skills and clinical decision-making abilities of the 125 students participating in the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our study, the mean score of the sub-dimensions of the Groningen Reflection Skills Scale was 77.04±5.14 for the fifth-year student population surveyed. Scores from the \\\"Self-Reflection\\\" and \\\"Reflective Communication\\\" sub-dimensions of the Groningen Reflection Skills Scale were compared based on gender, participation in summer internships, receipt of scholarships, membership in social sciences clubs, place of residence, school attended, diary-keeping habits, study styles, and cities of residence. Although there were some differences between the groups, these differences were not statistically significant. The total scores of the students on the Clinical Decision-Making Scale sub-dimensions ranged from 98 to 169, with a mean score of 146.18±10.97. A statistically positive and moderate correlation was found between the total scores of the participants on the Groningen Reflection Skills Scale and the total scores they obtained on the Clinical Decision-Making Scale (r=0.403; p=0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Consequently, an increase in the reflection skills of participants is associated with higher clinical decision-making scores. Reflection is the primary means of transitioning students from novices to experts, enhancing both comprehensive learning and learning experiences. Therefore, every medical school should develop a training program for student reflection, along with a feedback and assessment system integrated into the curriculum.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital\",\"volume\":\"57 4\",\"pages\":\"543-551\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10805058/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14744/SEMB.2023.52223\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/SEMB.2023.52223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估医学院学生的反思能力和影响这些能力的因素,并衡量学生的反思能力对其临床决策的影响:本研究是一项针对瓦基弗大学医学院耳鼻喉科(ENT)五年级实习生的教育研究项目。采用有效可靠的 "反思水平判定量表 "和 "临床决策量表 "来评估参与研究的 125 名学生的反思能力和临床决策能力:在我们的研究中,被调查的五年级学生的格罗宁根反思技能量表各分项平均得分为(77.04±5.14)分。根据性别、参加暑期实习情况、获得奖学金情况、社会科学俱乐部成员情况、居住地、就读学校、记日记习惯、学习方式和居住城市,对格罗宁根反思能力量表 "自我反思 "和 "反思性交流 "两个子维度的得分进行了比较。虽然各组之间存在一些差异,但这些差异在统计上并不显著。学生在临床决策量表子维度上的总分介于 98 分至 169 分之间,平均分为(146.18±10.97)分。格罗宁根反思技能量表的总分与临床决策量表的总分在统计学上呈中度正相关(r=0.403;p=0.001):因此,学员反思能力的提高与临床决策得分的提高有关。反思是学生从新手到专家过渡的主要手段,既能提高综合学习能力,又能增强学习体验。因此,每所医学院校都应制定学生反思培训计划,并在课程中融入反馈和评估系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors Affecting the Level of Reflective Thinking and Clinical Decision-Making Skills in Medical Faculty Students.

Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the reflection skills of students at the Faculty of Medicine and the factors influencing these skills, as well as to measure the impact of students' reflection skills on their clinical decision-making.

Methods: This study is an educational research project conducted on fifth-year Ear Nose Throat (ENT) interns at Vakif University's Faculty of Medicine. The "Reflective Thinking Level Determination Scale" and the "Clinical Decision-Making Scale," which are valid and reliable, were used to assess the reflection skills and clinical decision-making abilities of the 125 students participating in the study.

Results: In our study, the mean score of the sub-dimensions of the Groningen Reflection Skills Scale was 77.04±5.14 for the fifth-year student population surveyed. Scores from the "Self-Reflection" and "Reflective Communication" sub-dimensions of the Groningen Reflection Skills Scale were compared based on gender, participation in summer internships, receipt of scholarships, membership in social sciences clubs, place of residence, school attended, diary-keeping habits, study styles, and cities of residence. Although there were some differences between the groups, these differences were not statistically significant. The total scores of the students on the Clinical Decision-Making Scale sub-dimensions ranged from 98 to 169, with a mean score of 146.18±10.97. A statistically positive and moderate correlation was found between the total scores of the participants on the Groningen Reflection Skills Scale and the total scores they obtained on the Clinical Decision-Making Scale (r=0.403; p=0.001).

Conclusion: Consequently, an increase in the reflection skills of participants is associated with higher clinical decision-making scores. Reflection is the primary means of transitioning students from novices to experts, enhancing both comprehensive learning and learning experiences. Therefore, every medical school should develop a training program for student reflection, along with a feedback and assessment system integrated into the curriculum.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital
Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
16.70%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信