麻醉猪 RQ 估算替代技术的验证。

IF 2.8 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Jacob Karlsson, Anders Svedmyr, Mats Wallin, Magnus Hallbäck, Per-Arne Lönnqvist
{"title":"麻醉猪 RQ 估算替代技术的验证。","authors":"Jacob Karlsson, Anders Svedmyr, Mats Wallin, Magnus Hallbäck, Per-Arne Lönnqvist","doi":"10.1186/s40635-024-00598-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Respiratory quotient (RQ) is an important variable when assessing metabolic status in intensive care patients. However, analysis of RQ requires cumbersome technical equipment. The aim of the current study was to examine a simplified blood gas-based method of RQ assessment, using Douglas bag measurement of RQ (Douglas-RQ) as reference in a laboratory porcine model under metabolic steady state. In addition, we aimed at establishing reference values for RQ in the same population, thereby generating data to facilitate further research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RQ was measured in 11 mechanically ventilated pigs under metabolic steady state using Douglas-RQ and CO-oximetry blood gas analysis of pulmonary artery and systemic carbon dioxide and oxygen content. The CO-oximetry data were used to calculate RQ (blood gas RQ). Paired recordings with both methods were made once in the morning and once in the afternoon and values obtained were analyzed for potential significant differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average Douglas-RQ, for all data points over the whole day, was 0.97 (95%CI 0.95-0.99). The corresponding blood gas RQ was 0.95 (95%CI 0.87-1.02). There was no statistically significant difference in RQ values obtained using Douglas-RQ or blood gas RQ for all data over the whole day (P = 0.43). Bias was - 0.02 (95% limits of agreement ± 0.3). Douglas-RQ decreased during the day 1.00 (95%CI 0.97-1.03) vs 0.95 (95%CI 0.92-0.98) P < 0.001, whereas the decrease was not significant for blood gas RQ 1.02 (95%CI 0.89-1.16 vs 0.87 (0.80-0.94) P = 0.11.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RQ values obtained with blood gas analysis did not differ statistically, compared to gold standard Douglas bag RQ measurement, showing low bias but relatively large limits of agreement, when analyzed for the whole day. This indicates that a simplified blood gas-based method for RQ estimations may be used as an alternative to gold standard expired gas analysis on a group level, even if individual values may differ. In addition, RQ estimated with Douglas bag analysis of exhaled air, was 0.97 in anesthetized non-fasted pigs and decreased during prolonged anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":13750,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","volume":"12 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10811304/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of an alternative technique for RQ estimation in anesthetized pigs.\",\"authors\":\"Jacob Karlsson, Anders Svedmyr, Mats Wallin, Magnus Hallbäck, Per-Arne Lönnqvist\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40635-024-00598-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Respiratory quotient (RQ) is an important variable when assessing metabolic status in intensive care patients. However, analysis of RQ requires cumbersome technical equipment. The aim of the current study was to examine a simplified blood gas-based method of RQ assessment, using Douglas bag measurement of RQ (Douglas-RQ) as reference in a laboratory porcine model under metabolic steady state. In addition, we aimed at establishing reference values for RQ in the same population, thereby generating data to facilitate further research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RQ was measured in 11 mechanically ventilated pigs under metabolic steady state using Douglas-RQ and CO-oximetry blood gas analysis of pulmonary artery and systemic carbon dioxide and oxygen content. The CO-oximetry data were used to calculate RQ (blood gas RQ). Paired recordings with both methods were made once in the morning and once in the afternoon and values obtained were analyzed for potential significant differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average Douglas-RQ, for all data points over the whole day, was 0.97 (95%CI 0.95-0.99). The corresponding blood gas RQ was 0.95 (95%CI 0.87-1.02). There was no statistically significant difference in RQ values obtained using Douglas-RQ or blood gas RQ for all data over the whole day (P = 0.43). Bias was - 0.02 (95% limits of agreement ± 0.3). Douglas-RQ decreased during the day 1.00 (95%CI 0.97-1.03) vs 0.95 (95%CI 0.92-0.98) P < 0.001, whereas the decrease was not significant for blood gas RQ 1.02 (95%CI 0.89-1.16 vs 0.87 (0.80-0.94) P = 0.11.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RQ values obtained with blood gas analysis did not differ statistically, compared to gold standard Douglas bag RQ measurement, showing low bias but relatively large limits of agreement, when analyzed for the whole day. This indicates that a simplified blood gas-based method for RQ estimations may be used as an alternative to gold standard expired gas analysis on a group level, even if individual values may differ. In addition, RQ estimated with Douglas bag analysis of exhaled air, was 0.97 in anesthetized non-fasted pigs and decreased during prolonged anesthesia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10811304/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-024-00598-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-024-00598-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:呼吸商(RQ)是评估重症监护患者代谢状况的一个重要变量。然而,分析 RQ 需要繁琐的技术设备。本研究的目的是研究一种基于血气的简化 RQ 评估方法,使用道格拉斯袋测量 RQ(Douglas-RQ)作为代谢稳态下实验室猪模型的参考值。此外,我们还旨在确定同一人群的 RQ 参考值,从而为进一步研究提供数据:方法:使用道格拉斯-RQ 和二氧化碳氧饱和度血气分析法对 11 头机械通气猪在代谢稳定状态下的 RQ 进行测量。二氧化碳氧饱和度数据用于计算 RQ(血气 RQ)。用这两种方法分别在上午和下午进行了一次配对记录,并对所得数值进行了分析,以找出可能存在的显著差异:全天所有数据点的平均道格拉斯 RQ 为 0.97(95%CI 0.95-0.99)。相应的血气 RQ 为 0.95(95%CI 0.87-1.02)。在全天的所有数据中,使用道格拉斯-RQ 或血气 RQ 得出的 RQ 值没有明显的统计学差异(P = 0.43)。偏差为-0.02(95%的一致范围为±0.3)。道格拉斯-RQ 在一天中下降了 1.00(95%CI 0.97-1.03) vs 0.95(95%CI 0.92-0.98)P 结论:通过血气分析获得的 RQ 值与黄金标准道格拉斯袋 RQ 测量值相比没有统计学差异。这表明,基于血气的简化 RQ 估算方法可在群体层面替代金标准呼出气体分析,即使个体数值可能存在差异。此外,用道格拉斯袋分析呼出气体估算的 RQ 值在麻醉的非禁食猪中为 0.97,在长时间麻醉时有所下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of an alternative technique for RQ estimation in anesthetized pigs.

Background: Respiratory quotient (RQ) is an important variable when assessing metabolic status in intensive care patients. However, analysis of RQ requires cumbersome technical equipment. The aim of the current study was to examine a simplified blood gas-based method of RQ assessment, using Douglas bag measurement of RQ (Douglas-RQ) as reference in a laboratory porcine model under metabolic steady state. In addition, we aimed at establishing reference values for RQ in the same population, thereby generating data to facilitate further research.

Methods: RQ was measured in 11 mechanically ventilated pigs under metabolic steady state using Douglas-RQ and CO-oximetry blood gas analysis of pulmonary artery and systemic carbon dioxide and oxygen content. The CO-oximetry data were used to calculate RQ (blood gas RQ). Paired recordings with both methods were made once in the morning and once in the afternoon and values obtained were analyzed for potential significant differences.

Results: The average Douglas-RQ, for all data points over the whole day, was 0.97 (95%CI 0.95-0.99). The corresponding blood gas RQ was 0.95 (95%CI 0.87-1.02). There was no statistically significant difference in RQ values obtained using Douglas-RQ or blood gas RQ for all data over the whole day (P = 0.43). Bias was - 0.02 (95% limits of agreement ± 0.3). Douglas-RQ decreased during the day 1.00 (95%CI 0.97-1.03) vs 0.95 (95%CI 0.92-0.98) P < 0.001, whereas the decrease was not significant for blood gas RQ 1.02 (95%CI 0.89-1.16 vs 0.87 (0.80-0.94) P = 0.11.

Conclusion: RQ values obtained with blood gas analysis did not differ statistically, compared to gold standard Douglas bag RQ measurement, showing low bias but relatively large limits of agreement, when analyzed for the whole day. This indicates that a simplified blood gas-based method for RQ estimations may be used as an alternative to gold standard expired gas analysis on a group level, even if individual values may differ. In addition, RQ estimated with Douglas bag analysis of exhaled air, was 0.97 in anesthetized non-fasted pigs and decreased during prolonged anesthesia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信