CYFRA 21-1 和 CEA 作为局部晚期和转移性胃癌的预后和预测标志物的作用。

Vishnu Gopal, Yadav Nisha, Prasanth Ganesan, Smita Kayal, Zachariah Bobby, Subathra Adithan, Prasanth Penumadu, Vishnu P Ramakrishnalay, Bhanu P Bandlamudi, Arnab Bahttacharjee, Sindhu Dahagama, Biswajit Dubashi
{"title":"CYFRA 21-1 和 CEA 作为局部晚期和转移性胃癌的预后和预测标志物的作用。","authors":"Vishnu Gopal, Yadav Nisha, Prasanth Ganesan, Smita Kayal, Zachariah Bobby, Subathra Adithan, Prasanth Penumadu, Vishnu P Ramakrishnalay, Bhanu P Bandlamudi, Arnab Bahttacharjee, Sindhu Dahagama, Biswajit Dubashi","doi":"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_746_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Tumor-associated serum markers have demonstrated predictive and prognostic value in patients being treated for malignancies. However, the clinical importance of tumor markers in gastric cancers (GC) is poorly standardized.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective is to assess the clinical utility of cytokeratin-19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as serum tumor markers in advanced GC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective study, CYFRA 21-1 and CEA levels were measured at baseline and after three cycles of chemotherapy in patients with advanced GC. The association of tumor marker levels with prognosis and decline of tumor markers with radiological overall response rates (ORR) and survival were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 105 patients, the proportion of patients with elevated baseline CYFRA 21-1 and CEA levels was 55% (N = 58) and 37% (N = 39) based on predefined cutoffs. Response assessment was done for 61 patients who received a minimum of three cycles of chemotherapy. A 15% and 13% reduction of serum levels from baseline for CYFRA 21-1 and CEA were selected for defining \"CYFRA 21-1 response\" and \"CEA-response,\" respectively. Both responses were significant predictors of radiological ORR. The median overall survival (OS) was 9.6 months in the entire cohort and 13 months for patients who received at least three cycles of chemotherapy. In multivariate analysis, baseline CEA levels and ECOG status were significant predictors of OS. In a subset analysis of patients receiving palliative chemotherapy, any of the tumor marker responses predicted improved 1-year OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In advanced GC, CYFRA 21-1 and CEA decline from baseline appeared to be reliable surrogate markers of chemotherapy efficacy and improved survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":94070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"1412-1419"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of CYFRA 21-1 and CEA as prognostic and predictive markers in locally advanced and metastatic gastric carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Vishnu Gopal, Yadav Nisha, Prasanth Ganesan, Smita Kayal, Zachariah Bobby, Subathra Adithan, Prasanth Penumadu, Vishnu P Ramakrishnalay, Bhanu P Bandlamudi, Arnab Bahttacharjee, Sindhu Dahagama, Biswajit Dubashi\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_746_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Tumor-associated serum markers have demonstrated predictive and prognostic value in patients being treated for malignancies. However, the clinical importance of tumor markers in gastric cancers (GC) is poorly standardized.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective is to assess the clinical utility of cytokeratin-19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as serum tumor markers in advanced GC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective study, CYFRA 21-1 and CEA levels were measured at baseline and after three cycles of chemotherapy in patients with advanced GC. The association of tumor marker levels with prognosis and decline of tumor markers with radiological overall response rates (ORR) and survival were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 105 patients, the proportion of patients with elevated baseline CYFRA 21-1 and CEA levels was 55% (N = 58) and 37% (N = 39) based on predefined cutoffs. Response assessment was done for 61 patients who received a minimum of three cycles of chemotherapy. A 15% and 13% reduction of serum levels from baseline for CYFRA 21-1 and CEA were selected for defining \\\"CYFRA 21-1 response\\\" and \\\"CEA-response,\\\" respectively. Both responses were significant predictors of radiological ORR. The median overall survival (OS) was 9.6 months in the entire cohort and 13 months for patients who received at least three cycles of chemotherapy. In multivariate analysis, baseline CEA levels and ECOG status were significant predictors of OS. In a subset analysis of patients receiving palliative chemotherapy, any of the tumor marker responses predicted improved 1-year OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In advanced GC, CYFRA 21-1 and CEA decline from baseline appeared to be reliable surrogate markers of chemotherapy efficacy and improved survival.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1412-1419\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_746_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_746_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肿瘤相关血清标志物对接受恶性肿瘤治疗的患者具有预测和预后价值。然而,肿瘤标志物在胃癌(GC)中的临床重要性还没有得到很好的标准化:目的:评估细胞角蛋白-19片段(CYFRA 21-1)和癌胚抗原(CEA)作为晚期胃癌血清肿瘤标志物的临床实用性:在这项前瞻性研究中,对晚期GC患者在基线和三个化疗周期后的CYFRA 21-1和CEA水平进行了测定。分析了肿瘤标志物水平与预后的关系以及肿瘤标志物下降与放射学总反应率(ORR)和生存率的关系:根据预先确定的临界值,在105例患者中,基线CYFRA 21-1和CEA水平升高的患者比例分别为55%(58例)和37%(39例)。对接受至少三个化疗周期的 61 名患者进行了反应评估。CYFRA 21-1和CEA的血清水平比基线分别降低15%和13%,即为 "CYFRA 21-1反应 "和 "CEA反应"。这两种反应都是放射学 ORR 的重要预测指标。整个队列的中位总生存期(OS)为9.6个月,接受至少三个化疗周期的患者的中位总生存期为13个月。在多变量分析中,基线CEA水平和ECOG状态是预测OS的重要因素。在对接受姑息化疗的患者进行的子集分析中,任何一种肿瘤标志物反应都可预测患者的1年生存期:结论:在晚期 GC 中,CYFRA 21-1 和 CEA 从基线开始下降似乎是化疗疗效和生存改善的可靠替代指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Role of CYFRA 21-1 and CEA as prognostic and predictive markers in locally advanced and metastatic gastric carcinoma.

Purpose: Tumor-associated serum markers have demonstrated predictive and prognostic value in patients being treated for malignancies. However, the clinical importance of tumor markers in gastric cancers (GC) is poorly standardized.

Objectives: The objective is to assess the clinical utility of cytokeratin-19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as serum tumor markers in advanced GC.

Methods: In this prospective study, CYFRA 21-1 and CEA levels were measured at baseline and after three cycles of chemotherapy in patients with advanced GC. The association of tumor marker levels with prognosis and decline of tumor markers with radiological overall response rates (ORR) and survival were analyzed.

Results: In the 105 patients, the proportion of patients with elevated baseline CYFRA 21-1 and CEA levels was 55% (N = 58) and 37% (N = 39) based on predefined cutoffs. Response assessment was done for 61 patients who received a minimum of three cycles of chemotherapy. A 15% and 13% reduction of serum levels from baseline for CYFRA 21-1 and CEA were selected for defining "CYFRA 21-1 response" and "CEA-response," respectively. Both responses were significant predictors of radiological ORR. The median overall survival (OS) was 9.6 months in the entire cohort and 13 months for patients who received at least three cycles of chemotherapy. In multivariate analysis, baseline CEA levels and ECOG status were significant predictors of OS. In a subset analysis of patients receiving palliative chemotherapy, any of the tumor marker responses predicted improved 1-year OS.

Conclusion: In advanced GC, CYFRA 21-1 and CEA decline from baseline appeared to be reliable surrogate markers of chemotherapy efficacy and improved survival.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信