针对 COVID-19 感染后重症监护室后综合征和慢性疼痛的精神因素管理的特定后续计划的有效性:随机临床试验 DOLOR-COVID 的结果

IF 0.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
A. Ojeda , A. Calvo , T. Cuñat , R. Mellado-Artigas , A. Costas-Carrera , M.M. Sánchez-Rodriguez , O. Comino-Trinidad , J. Aliaga , M. Arias , G. Martínez-Pallí , C. Dürsteler , C. Ferrando
{"title":"针对 COVID-19 感染后重症监护室后综合征和慢性疼痛的精神因素管理的特定后续计划的有效性:随机临床试验 DOLOR-COVID 的结果","authors":"A. Ojeda ,&nbsp;A. Calvo ,&nbsp;T. Cuñat ,&nbsp;R. Mellado-Artigas ,&nbsp;A. Costas-Carrera ,&nbsp;M.M. Sánchez-Rodriguez ,&nbsp;O. Comino-Trinidad ,&nbsp;J. Aliaga ,&nbsp;M. Arias ,&nbsp;G. Martínez-Pallí ,&nbsp;C. Dürsteler ,&nbsp;C. Ferrando","doi":"10.1016/j.redar.2023.05.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Critical COVID-19 survivors are at risk of developing Post-intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) and Chronic ICU-Related Pain (CIRP). We determined whether a specific care program improves the quality of life (QoL) of patients at risk of developing PICS and CIRP after COVID-19 disease.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The PAIN-COVID trial was a parallel-group, single-centre, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. The intervention consisted of a follow up program, patient education on PICS and pain, and a psychological intervention based on Rehm's self-control model in patients with abnormal depression scores (&gt;<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->8) in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at the baseline visit. QoL was evaluated with the 5-level EQ 5<!--> <!-->D (EQ 5<!--> <!-->D 5<!--> <!-->L), mood disorders with the HADS, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) with the PCL-5 checklist, and pain with the Brief Pain Inventory short form, the Douleur Neuropathique 4 questionnaire, and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. The primary outcome was to determine if the program was superior to standard-of-care on the EQ visual analogue scale (VAS) at 6 months after the baseline visit. The secondary outcomes were EQ VAS at 3 months, and EQ index, CIRP incidence and characteristics, and anxiety, depression, and PTSD at 3 and 6 months after baseline visits.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This program was not superior to standard care in improving QoL in critical COVID-19 survivors as measured by the EQ VAS. However, our data can help establish better strategies for the study and management of PICS and CIRP in this population.</p><p>Trial registration: # <span>NCT04394169</span><svg><path></path></svg>, registered on 5/19/2020.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46479,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efectividad de un programa de seguimiento específico para el manejo de los componentes mentales del síndrome poscuidados intensivos y el dolor crónico tras la enfermedad por coronavirus de 2019: resultados del ensayo clínico aleatorizado “PAIN-COVID”\",\"authors\":\"A. Ojeda ,&nbsp;A. Calvo ,&nbsp;T. Cuñat ,&nbsp;R. Mellado-Artigas ,&nbsp;A. Costas-Carrera ,&nbsp;M.M. Sánchez-Rodriguez ,&nbsp;O. Comino-Trinidad ,&nbsp;J. Aliaga ,&nbsp;M. Arias ,&nbsp;G. Martínez-Pallí ,&nbsp;C. Dürsteler ,&nbsp;C. Ferrando\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.redar.2023.05.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Critical COVID-19 survivors are at risk of developing Post-intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) and Chronic ICU-Related Pain (CIRP). We determined whether a specific care program improves the quality of life (QoL) of patients at risk of developing PICS and CIRP after COVID-19 disease.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The PAIN-COVID trial was a parallel-group, single-centre, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. The intervention consisted of a follow up program, patient education on PICS and pain, and a psychological intervention based on Rehm's self-control model in patients with abnormal depression scores (&gt;<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->8) in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at the baseline visit. QoL was evaluated with the 5-level EQ 5<!--> <!-->D (EQ 5<!--> <!-->D 5<!--> <!-->L), mood disorders with the HADS, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) with the PCL-5 checklist, and pain with the Brief Pain Inventory short form, the Douleur Neuropathique 4 questionnaire, and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. The primary outcome was to determine if the program was superior to standard-of-care on the EQ visual analogue scale (VAS) at 6 months after the baseline visit. The secondary outcomes were EQ VAS at 3 months, and EQ index, CIRP incidence and characteristics, and anxiety, depression, and PTSD at 3 and 6 months after baseline visits.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This program was not superior to standard care in improving QoL in critical COVID-19 survivors as measured by the EQ VAS. However, our data can help establish better strategies for the study and management of PICS and CIRP in this population.</p><p>Trial registration: # <span>NCT04394169</span><svg><path></path></svg>, registered on 5/19/2020.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034935623002736\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034935623002736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景COVID-19重症幸存者有患重症监护后综合征(PICS)和慢性重症监护病房相关疼痛(CIRP)的风险。我们确定了一项特定护理计划是否能改善 COVID-19 病后有可能患重症监护后综合征和慢性重症监护相关疼痛的患者的生活质量(QoL)。方法 PAIN-COVID 试验是一项平行组、单中心、单盲、随机对照试验。干预措施包括随访计划、PICS 和疼痛方面的患者教育,以及基于雷姆自我控制模型的心理干预,干预对象为基线访问时在医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)中抑郁评分异常(> = 8)的患者。患者的 QoL 评估采用 5 级 EQ 5 D (EQ 5 D 5 L),情绪障碍采用 HADS,创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)采用 PCL-5 核对表,疼痛采用简明疼痛量表简表、Douleur Neuropathique 4 问卷和疼痛灾难化量表。主要结果是确定该计划在基线访问后 6 个月的 EQ 视觉模拟量表(VAS)上是否优于标准护理。次要结果是 3 个月时的 EQ VAS,以及基线访问后 3 个月和 6 个月时的 EQ 指数、CIRP 发生率和特征,以及焦虑、抑郁和创伤后应激障碍。不过,我们的数据有助于为研究和管理该人群中的 PICS 和 CIRP 制定更好的策略:# NCT04394169,注册日期:2020年5月19日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Efectividad de un programa de seguimiento específico para el manejo de los componentes mentales del síndrome poscuidados intensivos y el dolor crónico tras la enfermedad por coronavirus de 2019: resultados del ensayo clínico aleatorizado “PAIN-COVID”

Efectividad de un programa de seguimiento específico para el manejo de los componentes mentales del síndrome poscuidados intensivos y el dolor crónico tras la enfermedad por coronavirus de 2019: resultados del ensayo clínico aleatorizado “PAIN-COVID”

Background

Critical COVID-19 survivors are at risk of developing Post-intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) and Chronic ICU-Related Pain (CIRP). We determined whether a specific care program improves the quality of life (QoL) of patients at risk of developing PICS and CIRP after COVID-19 disease.

Methods

The PAIN-COVID trial was a parallel-group, single-centre, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. The intervention consisted of a follow up program, patient education on PICS and pain, and a psychological intervention based on Rehm's self-control model in patients with abnormal depression scores (> = 8) in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at the baseline visit. QoL was evaluated with the 5-level EQ 5 D (EQ 5 D 5 L), mood disorders with the HADS, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) with the PCL-5 checklist, and pain with the Brief Pain Inventory short form, the Douleur Neuropathique 4 questionnaire, and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. The primary outcome was to determine if the program was superior to standard-of-care on the EQ visual analogue scale (VAS) at 6 months after the baseline visit. The secondary outcomes were EQ VAS at 3 months, and EQ index, CIRP incidence and characteristics, and anxiety, depression, and PTSD at 3 and 6 months after baseline visits.

Conclusions

This program was not superior to standard care in improving QoL in critical COVID-19 survivors as measured by the EQ VAS. However, our data can help establish better strategies for the study and management of PICS and CIRP in this population.

Trial registration: # NCT04394169, registered on 5/19/2020.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
113
审稿时长
82 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信