使用小儿旋转锉系统进行根管器械治疗后,封闭质量与髓核切除的初级磨牙结果之间的相关性

IF 0.6 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Girish Babu K.L. , Kavyashree Gururaj Hebbar , Geeta Maruti Doddamani
{"title":"使用小儿旋转锉系统进行根管器械治疗后,封闭质量与髓核切除的初级磨牙结果之间的相关性","authors":"Girish Babu K.L. ,&nbsp;Kavyashree Gururaj Hebbar ,&nbsp;Geeta Maruti Doddamani","doi":"10.1016/j.pdj.2023.12.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span>The success of root canal treatment is influenced by several factors including the type and technique of </span>root canal preparation<span>, the type of irrigants used, the quality of obturation, and post-endodontic restoration. Recent systematic reviews have concluded that there is no substantial evidence to establish the superiority of rotary file systems over hand files in terms of clinical and radiographic success in pulpectomized teeth.</span></p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To determine the correlation between quality of obturation and long-term outcome of pulpectomized primary molars<span> following root canal instrumentation with pediatric rotary file systems and a hand file system.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study involved 100 primary molars from children aged 4–7 years that required pulpectomy<span><span>. The teeth were divided into four groups, each consisting of 25 teeth. In the first, second, third, and fourth groups, root canal instrumentation was carried out with Pedo-Flex pediatric rotary files (Group PF), Kedo-SG pediatric rotary files (Group KS), Pro-AF Baby Gold pediatric rotary files (Group BG), and hand nickel titanium K files (Group HF), respectively. Obturation was performed with </span>zinc oxide eugenol cement<span> using an engine-driven Lentulo-spiral. The quality of the root filling was assessed immediately after obturation through radiographic examination. The pulpectomized teeth were then evaluated both clinically and radiographically over a two-year period.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The quality of obturation was superior in the root canals instrumented with pediatric rotary file systems compared to hand files. At the end of follow-up period, the clinical success rate was 100% and the radiological success rates were 88%, 92%, 92%, and 80% in Groups PF, KS, BG, and HF, respectively. The optimally filled pulpectomized primary molars resulted in a superior success rate than compared to underfilled or overfilled teeth.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The quality of obturation significantly influences the success rate of pulpectomized teeth. Therefore, the use of pediatric rotary files is recommended as rotary files contribute to a greater number of optimally filled canals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19977,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Dental Journal","volume":"34 1","pages":"Pages 27-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation between quality of obturation and outcome of pulpectomized primary molars following root canal instrumentation with pediatric rotary file systems\",\"authors\":\"Girish Babu K.L. ,&nbsp;Kavyashree Gururaj Hebbar ,&nbsp;Geeta Maruti Doddamani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pdj.2023.12.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span>The success of root canal treatment is influenced by several factors including the type and technique of </span>root canal preparation<span>, the type of irrigants used, the quality of obturation, and post-endodontic restoration. Recent systematic reviews have concluded that there is no substantial evidence to establish the superiority of rotary file systems over hand files in terms of clinical and radiographic success in pulpectomized teeth.</span></p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To determine the correlation between quality of obturation and long-term outcome of pulpectomized primary molars<span> following root canal instrumentation with pediatric rotary file systems and a hand file system.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study involved 100 primary molars from children aged 4–7 years that required pulpectomy<span><span>. The teeth were divided into four groups, each consisting of 25 teeth. In the first, second, third, and fourth groups, root canal instrumentation was carried out with Pedo-Flex pediatric rotary files (Group PF), Kedo-SG pediatric rotary files (Group KS), Pro-AF Baby Gold pediatric rotary files (Group BG), and hand nickel titanium K files (Group HF), respectively. Obturation was performed with </span>zinc oxide eugenol cement<span> using an engine-driven Lentulo-spiral. The quality of the root filling was assessed immediately after obturation through radiographic examination. The pulpectomized teeth were then evaluated both clinically and radiographically over a two-year period.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The quality of obturation was superior in the root canals instrumented with pediatric rotary file systems compared to hand files. At the end of follow-up period, the clinical success rate was 100% and the radiological success rates were 88%, 92%, 92%, and 80% in Groups PF, KS, BG, and HF, respectively. The optimally filled pulpectomized primary molars resulted in a superior success rate than compared to underfilled or overfilled teeth.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The quality of obturation significantly influences the success rate of pulpectomized teeth. Therefore, the use of pediatric rotary files is recommended as rotary files contribute to a greater number of optimally filled canals.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 27-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0917239423000630\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0917239423000630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言根管治疗的成功与否受多种因素的影响,包括根管预备的类型和技术、所用冲洗剂的类型、封闭的质量以及根管治疗后的修复。最近的系统综述得出结论,在牙髓切除术牙齿的临床和放射学成功率方面,没有实质性证据证明旋转锉系统优于手动锉系统。 研究涉及 100 颗需要进行牙髓切除术的 4-7 岁儿童的初级磨牙。这些牙齿被分为四组,每组 25 颗。第一、第二、第三和第四组分别使用Pedo-Flex儿童旋转锉(PF组)、Kedo-SG儿童旋转锉(KS组)、Pro-AF Baby Gold儿童旋转锉(BG组)和手工镍钛K锉(HF组)进行根管器械治疗。使用氧化锌丁香酚水门汀和发动机驱动的Lentulo-spiral进行封闭。牙根充填后立即通过射线检查评估充填质量。结果与手工锉相比,使用儿科旋转锉系统进行根管器械充填的根管充填质量更好。在随访期结束时,PF组、KS组、BG组和HF组的临床成功率为100%,放射学成功率分别为88%、92%、92%和80%。与充填不足或充填过度的牙齿相比,最佳充填的脉管切除原磨牙的成功率更高。因此,建议使用小儿旋转锉,因为旋转锉有助于获得更多的最佳充填根管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Correlation between quality of obturation and outcome of pulpectomized primary molars following root canal instrumentation with pediatric rotary file systems

Introduction

The success of root canal treatment is influenced by several factors including the type and technique of root canal preparation, the type of irrigants used, the quality of obturation, and post-endodontic restoration. Recent systematic reviews have concluded that there is no substantial evidence to establish the superiority of rotary file systems over hand files in terms of clinical and radiographic success in pulpectomized teeth.

Aim

To determine the correlation between quality of obturation and long-term outcome of pulpectomized primary molars following root canal instrumentation with pediatric rotary file systems and a hand file system.

Methods

The study involved 100 primary molars from children aged 4–7 years that required pulpectomy. The teeth were divided into four groups, each consisting of 25 teeth. In the first, second, third, and fourth groups, root canal instrumentation was carried out with Pedo-Flex pediatric rotary files (Group PF), Kedo-SG pediatric rotary files (Group KS), Pro-AF Baby Gold pediatric rotary files (Group BG), and hand nickel titanium K files (Group HF), respectively. Obturation was performed with zinc oxide eugenol cement using an engine-driven Lentulo-spiral. The quality of the root filling was assessed immediately after obturation through radiographic examination. The pulpectomized teeth were then evaluated both clinically and radiographically over a two-year period.

Results

The quality of obturation was superior in the root canals instrumented with pediatric rotary file systems compared to hand files. At the end of follow-up period, the clinical success rate was 100% and the radiological success rates were 88%, 92%, 92%, and 80% in Groups PF, KS, BG, and HF, respectively. The optimally filled pulpectomized primary molars resulted in a superior success rate than compared to underfilled or overfilled teeth.

Conclusion

The quality of obturation significantly influences the success rate of pulpectomized teeth. Therefore, the use of pediatric rotary files is recommended as rotary files contribute to a greater number of optimally filled canals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Dental Journal
Pediatric Dental Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
26 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信