乳腺癌治疗的自付费用和财务风险保护:印度的一项前瞻性研究

IF 5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Tabassum Wadasadawala , Sanjay K. Mohanty , Soumendu Sen , Tejaswi S. Kanala , Suraj Maiti , Namita Puchali , Sudeep Gupta , Rajiv Sarin , Vani Parmar
{"title":"乳腺癌治疗的自付费用和财务风险保护:印度的一项前瞻性研究","authors":"Tabassum Wadasadawala ,&nbsp;Sanjay K. Mohanty ,&nbsp;Soumendu Sen ,&nbsp;Tejaswi S. Kanala ,&nbsp;Suraj Maiti ,&nbsp;Namita Puchali ,&nbsp;Sudeep Gupta ,&nbsp;Rajiv Sarin ,&nbsp;Vani Parmar","doi":"10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Available data on cost of cancer treatment, out-of-pocket payment and reimbursement are limited in India. We estimated the treatment costs, out-of-pocket payment, and reimbursement in a cohort of breast cancer patients who sought treatment at a publicly funded tertiary cancer care hospital in India.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospective longitudinal study was conducted from June 2019 to March 2022 at Tata Memorial Centre (TMC), Mumbai. Data on expenditure during each visit of treatment was collected by a team of trained medical social workers. The primary outcome variables were total cost (TC) of treatment, out-of-pocket payment (OOP), and reimbursement. TC included cost incurred by breast cancer patients during treatment at TMC. OOP was defined as the total cost incurred at TMC less of reimbursement. Reimbursement was any form of financial assistance (cashless or repayment), including social health insurance, private health insurance, employee health schemes, and assistance from charitable trusts, received by the patients for breast cancer treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Of the 500 patients included in the study, 45 discontinued treatment (due to financial or other reasons) and 26 died during treatment. The mean TC of breast cancer treatment was ₹258,095/US$3531 (95% CI: 238,225, 277,934). Direct medical cost (MC) accounted for 56.3% of the TC. Systemic therapy costs (₹50,869/US$696) were higher than radiotherapy (₹33,483/US$458) and surgery costs (₹25,075/US$343). About 74.4% patients availed some form of financial assistance at TMC; 8% patients received full reimbursement. The mean OOP for breast cancer treatment was ₹186,461/US$2551 (95% CI: 167,666, 205,257), accounting for 72.2% of the TC. Social health insurance (SHI) had a reasonable coverage (33.1%), followed by charitable trusts (29.6%), employee health insurance (5.1%), private health insurance (4.4%) and 25.6% had no reimbursement. But SHI covered only 40.1% of the TC of treatment compared to private health insurance that covered as much as 57.1% of it. Both TC and OOP were higher for patients who were younger, belonged to rural areas, had a comorbidity, were diagnosed at an advanced stage, and were from outside Maharashtra.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>In India, the cost and OOP for breast cancer treatment are high and reimbursement for the treatment flows from multiple sources. Though many of the patients receive some form of reimbursement, it is insufficient to prevent high OOP. Hence both wider insurance coverage as well as higher cap of the insurance packages in the health insurance schemes is suggested. Allowing for the automatic inclusion of cancer treatment in SHI can mitigate the financial burden of cancer patients in India.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>This work was funded by an extramural grant from the <span>Women’s Cancer Initiative</span> and the <span>Nag Foundation</span> and an intramural grant from the <span>International Institute of Population Sciences</span>, Mumbai.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75136,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772368223002068/pdfft?md5=cb05bca4331a5cfe4b8403841c006692&pid=1-s2.0-S2772368223002068-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Out-of-pocket payment and financial risk protection for breast cancer treatment: a prospective study from India\",\"authors\":\"Tabassum Wadasadawala ,&nbsp;Sanjay K. Mohanty ,&nbsp;Soumendu Sen ,&nbsp;Tejaswi S. Kanala ,&nbsp;Suraj Maiti ,&nbsp;Namita Puchali ,&nbsp;Sudeep Gupta ,&nbsp;Rajiv Sarin ,&nbsp;Vani Parmar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Available data on cost of cancer treatment, out-of-pocket payment and reimbursement are limited in India. We estimated the treatment costs, out-of-pocket payment, and reimbursement in a cohort of breast cancer patients who sought treatment at a publicly funded tertiary cancer care hospital in India.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospective longitudinal study was conducted from June 2019 to March 2022 at Tata Memorial Centre (TMC), Mumbai. Data on expenditure during each visit of treatment was collected by a team of trained medical social workers. The primary outcome variables were total cost (TC) of treatment, out-of-pocket payment (OOP), and reimbursement. TC included cost incurred by breast cancer patients during treatment at TMC. OOP was defined as the total cost incurred at TMC less of reimbursement. Reimbursement was any form of financial assistance (cashless or repayment), including social health insurance, private health insurance, employee health schemes, and assistance from charitable trusts, received by the patients for breast cancer treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Of the 500 patients included in the study, 45 discontinued treatment (due to financial or other reasons) and 26 died during treatment. The mean TC of breast cancer treatment was ₹258,095/US$3531 (95% CI: 238,225, 277,934). Direct medical cost (MC) accounted for 56.3% of the TC. Systemic therapy costs (₹50,869/US$696) were higher than radiotherapy (₹33,483/US$458) and surgery costs (₹25,075/US$343). About 74.4% patients availed some form of financial assistance at TMC; 8% patients received full reimbursement. The mean OOP for breast cancer treatment was ₹186,461/US$2551 (95% CI: 167,666, 205,257), accounting for 72.2% of the TC. Social health insurance (SHI) had a reasonable coverage (33.1%), followed by charitable trusts (29.6%), employee health insurance (5.1%), private health insurance (4.4%) and 25.6% had no reimbursement. But SHI covered only 40.1% of the TC of treatment compared to private health insurance that covered as much as 57.1% of it. Both TC and OOP were higher for patients who were younger, belonged to rural areas, had a comorbidity, were diagnosed at an advanced stage, and were from outside Maharashtra.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>In India, the cost and OOP for breast cancer treatment are high and reimbursement for the treatment flows from multiple sources. Though many of the patients receive some form of reimbursement, it is insufficient to prevent high OOP. Hence both wider insurance coverage as well as higher cap of the insurance packages in the health insurance schemes is suggested. Allowing for the automatic inclusion of cancer treatment in SHI can mitigate the financial burden of cancer patients in India.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>This work was funded by an extramural grant from the <span>Women’s Cancer Initiative</span> and the <span>Nag Foundation</span> and an intramural grant from the <span>International Institute of Population Sciences</span>, Mumbai.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772368223002068/pdfft?md5=cb05bca4331a5cfe4b8403841c006692&pid=1-s2.0-S2772368223002068-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772368223002068\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772368223002068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景印度有关癌症治疗成本、自付费用和报销的可用数据非常有限。我们估算了在印度一家公立三级癌症治疗医院接受治疗的乳腺癌患者的治疗成本、自付费用和报销情况。方法 2019 年 6 月至 2022 年 3 月在孟买塔塔纪念中心(TMC)开展了一项前瞻性纵向研究。经过培训的医务社工团队收集了每次就诊期间的支出数据。主要结果变量为治疗总费用(TC)、自付费用(OOP)和报销费用。治疗总费用包括乳腺癌患者在东京医疗中心治疗期间的费用。自付费用是指在 TMC 治疗的总费用减去报销费用。报销是指患者在接受乳腺癌治疗时获得的任何形式的经济援助(无现金或偿还),包括社会医疗保险、私人医疗保险、员工医疗计划和慈善信托援助。乳腺癌治疗的平均 TC 为 258,095 英镑/3531 美元(95% CI:238,225, 277,934)。直接医疗费用(MC)占治疗费用的 56.3%。全身治疗费用(₹50,869/696 美元)高于放射治疗费用(₹33,483/458 美元)和手术费用(₹25,075/343 美元)。约74.4%的患者在TMC获得了某种形式的经济援助;8%的患者获得了全额报销。乳腺癌治疗的平均 OOP 为 186,461 英镑/2551 美元(95% CI:167,666,205,257),占 TC 的 72.2%。社会医疗保险的覆盖率较高(33.1%),其次是慈善信托(29.6%)、雇员医疗保险(5.1%)和私人医疗保险(4.4%),25.6%的人没有报销。但社会医疗保险只支付了治疗费用的 40.1%,而私人医疗保险则支付了高达 57.1%的治疗费用。在印度,乳腺癌的治疗费用和自付费用都很高,而治疗费用的报销来源是多方面的。虽然许多患者都能得到某种形式的报销,但这不足以避免高昂的自付费用。因此,建议扩大保险范围,并提高医疗保险计划中保险套餐的上限。允许将癌症治疗自动纳入社会医疗保险计划,可减轻印度癌症患者的经济负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Out-of-pocket payment and financial risk protection for breast cancer treatment: a prospective study from India

Background

Available data on cost of cancer treatment, out-of-pocket payment and reimbursement are limited in India. We estimated the treatment costs, out-of-pocket payment, and reimbursement in a cohort of breast cancer patients who sought treatment at a publicly funded tertiary cancer care hospital in India.

Methods

A prospective longitudinal study was conducted from June 2019 to March 2022 at Tata Memorial Centre (TMC), Mumbai. Data on expenditure during each visit of treatment was collected by a team of trained medical social workers. The primary outcome variables were total cost (TC) of treatment, out-of-pocket payment (OOP), and reimbursement. TC included cost incurred by breast cancer patients during treatment at TMC. OOP was defined as the total cost incurred at TMC less of reimbursement. Reimbursement was any form of financial assistance (cashless or repayment), including social health insurance, private health insurance, employee health schemes, and assistance from charitable trusts, received by the patients for breast cancer treatment.

Findings

Of the 500 patients included in the study, 45 discontinued treatment (due to financial or other reasons) and 26 died during treatment. The mean TC of breast cancer treatment was ₹258,095/US$3531 (95% CI: 238,225, 277,934). Direct medical cost (MC) accounted for 56.3% of the TC. Systemic therapy costs (₹50,869/US$696) were higher than radiotherapy (₹33,483/US$458) and surgery costs (₹25,075/US$343). About 74.4% patients availed some form of financial assistance at TMC; 8% patients received full reimbursement. The mean OOP for breast cancer treatment was ₹186,461/US$2551 (95% CI: 167,666, 205,257), accounting for 72.2% of the TC. Social health insurance (SHI) had a reasonable coverage (33.1%), followed by charitable trusts (29.6%), employee health insurance (5.1%), private health insurance (4.4%) and 25.6% had no reimbursement. But SHI covered only 40.1% of the TC of treatment compared to private health insurance that covered as much as 57.1% of it. Both TC and OOP were higher for patients who were younger, belonged to rural areas, had a comorbidity, were diagnosed at an advanced stage, and were from outside Maharashtra.

Interpretation

In India, the cost and OOP for breast cancer treatment are high and reimbursement for the treatment flows from multiple sources. Though many of the patients receive some form of reimbursement, it is insufficient to prevent high OOP. Hence both wider insurance coverage as well as higher cap of the insurance packages in the health insurance schemes is suggested. Allowing for the automatic inclusion of cancer treatment in SHI can mitigate the financial burden of cancer patients in India.

Funding

This work was funded by an extramural grant from the Women’s Cancer Initiative and the Nag Foundation and an intramural grant from the International Institute of Population Sciences, Mumbai.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信