在高强度间歇性交叉运动的最后一轮运动中,摄氧量超过了相同运动模式下的В˙ O2max。

IF 2.3 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Yuzhong Xu, Xin Liu, Katsunori Tsuji, Takafumi Hamaoka, Izumi Tabata
{"title":"在高强度间歇性交叉运动的最后一轮运动中,摄氧量超过了相同运动模式下的В˙ O2max。","authors":"Yuzhong Xu,&nbsp;Xin Liu,&nbsp;Katsunori Tsuji,&nbsp;Takafumi Hamaoka,&nbsp;Izumi Tabata","doi":"10.1016/j.smhs.2024.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Oxygen uptake (<span><math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math></span> O<sub>2</sub>) was measured during a non-exhaustive high-intensity intermittent cross-exercise (HIICE) protocol consisting of four alternating bouts of 20 ​s running (R) and three bouts of bicycle exercise (BE) at ∼160% and ∼170% maximal oxygen uptake (<span><math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math></span> O<sub>2</sub>max), respectively, with 10 ​s between-bout rests (sequence R-BE-R-BE-R-BE-R). The <span><math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math></span> O<sub>2</sub> during the last BE ([52.2 ​± ​5.0] mL·kg<sup>−1</sup>·min<sup>−1</sup>) was significantly higher than the <span><math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math></span> O<sub>2</sub>max of the BE ([48.0 ​± ​5.4] mL·kg<sup>−1</sup>·min<sup>−1</sup>, <em>n</em> ​= ​30) and similar to that of running. For clarifying the underlying mechanisms, a corresponding HIICE-protocol with BE and arm cranking ergometer exercise (AC) was used (sequence AC-AC-BE-AC-BE-AC-AC-BE). In some experiments, thigh blood flow was occluded by a cuff around the upper thigh. Without occlusion, the <span><math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math></span> O<sub>2</sub> during the AC ([39.2 ​± ​7.1] mL·kg<sup>−1</sup>·min<sup>−1</sup> [6<sup>th</sup> bout]) was significantly higher than the <span><math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math></span> O<sub>2</sub>max of AC ([30.2 ​± ​4.4] mL·kg<sup>−1</sup>·min<sup>−1</sup>, <em>n</em> ​= ​7). With occlusion, the corresponding <span><math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math></span> O<sub>2</sub> ([29.8 ​± ​3.9] mL·kg<sup>−1</sup>·min<sup>−1</sup>) was reduced to that of the <span><math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math></span> O<sub>2</sub>max of AC and significantly less than the <span><math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math></span> O<sub>2</sub> without occlusion. These findings suggest that during the last bouts of HIICE may exceed the of the specific exercise, probably because it is a summation of the <span><math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math></span> O<sub>2</sub> for the ongoing exercise plus excess post-oxygen consumption (EPOC) produced by the previous exercise with a higher <span><math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math></span> O<sub>2</sub>max.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33620,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine and Health Science","volume":"6 1","pages":"Pages 63-69"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666337624000027/pdfft?md5=31f356063ad4715c06dbbb4eeb7cbdd7&pid=1-s2.0-S2666337624000027-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oxygen uptake during the last bouts of exercise incorporated into high-intensity intermittent cross-exercise exceeds the V˙ O2max of the same exercise mode\",\"authors\":\"Yuzhong Xu,&nbsp;Xin Liu,&nbsp;Katsunori Tsuji,&nbsp;Takafumi Hamaoka,&nbsp;Izumi Tabata\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.smhs.2024.01.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Oxygen uptake (<span><math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math></span> O<sub>2</sub>) was measured during a non-exhaustive high-intensity intermittent cross-exercise (HIICE) protocol consisting of four alternating bouts of 20 ​s running (R) and three bouts of bicycle exercise (BE) at ∼160% and ∼170% maximal oxygen uptake (<span><math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math></span> O<sub>2</sub>max), respectively, with 10 ​s between-bout rests (sequence R-BE-R-BE-R-BE-R). The <span><math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math></span> O<sub>2</sub> during the last BE ([52.2 ​± ​5.0] mL·kg<sup>−1</sup>·min<sup>−1</sup>) was significantly higher than the <span><math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math></span> O<sub>2</sub>max of the BE ([48.0 ​± ​5.4] mL·kg<sup>−1</sup>·min<sup>−1</sup>, <em>n</em> ​= ​30) and similar to that of running. For clarifying the underlying mechanisms, a corresponding HIICE-protocol with BE and arm cranking ergometer exercise (AC) was used (sequence AC-AC-BE-AC-BE-AC-AC-BE). In some experiments, thigh blood flow was occluded by a cuff around the upper thigh. Without occlusion, the <span><math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math></span> O<sub>2</sub> during the AC ([39.2 ​± ​7.1] mL·kg<sup>−1</sup>·min<sup>−1</sup> [6<sup>th</sup> bout]) was significantly higher than the <span><math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math></span> O<sub>2</sub>max of AC ([30.2 ​± ​4.4] mL·kg<sup>−1</sup>·min<sup>−1</sup>, <em>n</em> ​= ​7). With occlusion, the corresponding <span><math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math></span> O<sub>2</sub> ([29.8 ​± ​3.9] mL·kg<sup>−1</sup>·min<sup>−1</sup>) was reduced to that of the <span><math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math></span> O<sub>2</sub>max of AC and significantly less than the <span><math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math></span> O<sub>2</sub> without occlusion. These findings suggest that during the last bouts of HIICE may exceed the of the specific exercise, probably because it is a summation of the <span><math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math></span> O<sub>2</sub> for the ongoing exercise plus excess post-oxygen consumption (EPOC) produced by the previous exercise with a higher <span><math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math></span> O<sub>2</sub>max.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Medicine and Health Science\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 63-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666337624000027/pdfft?md5=31f356063ad4715c06dbbb4eeb7cbdd7&pid=1-s2.0-S2666337624000027-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Medicine and Health Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666337624000027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine and Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666337624000027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在非消耗性高强度间歇交叉运动(HIICE)方案中测量了摄氧量(V˙ O2),该方案包括四次交替进行的 20 秒跑步(R)和三次自行车运动(BE),最大摄氧量(V˙ O2max)分别为∼160%和∼170%,两次运动之间休息 10 秒(序列 R-BE-R-BE-R-BE-R)。最后一次BE时的V˙ O2([52.2 ± 5.0] mL-kg-1-min-1)明显高于BE时的V˙ O2max([48.0 ± 5.4] mL-kg-1-min-1,n = 30),与跑步时相似。为阐明其基本机制,采用了相应的 HIICE 方案,即 BE 和曲臂测力计运动(AC)(序列为 AC-AC-BE-AC-BE-AC-AC-BE)。在一些实验中,大腿血流被大腿上部的袖带阻断。在没有闭塞的情况下,交流时的 V ˙ O2([39.2 ± 7.1] mL-kg-1-min-1 [第 6 次])明显高于交流的 V ˙ O2max([30.2 ± 4.4] mL-kg-1-min-1,n = 7)。闭塞时,相应的 V˙ O2([29.8 ± 3.9] mL-kg-1-min-1)降低到 AC 的 V˙ O2max,明显低于未闭塞时的 V˙ O2。这些研究结果表明,在 HIICE 的最后一次运动中,V˙ O2max 可能会超过特定运动的 V˙O2max,这可能是因为它是正在进行的运动的 V˙ O2max 加上之前运动产生的过量氧消耗(EPOC)的总和,而之前运动的 V˙ O2max 较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Oxygen uptake during the last bouts of exercise incorporated into high-intensity intermittent cross-exercise exceeds the V˙ O2max of the same exercise mode

Oxygen uptake (V˙ O2) was measured during a non-exhaustive high-intensity intermittent cross-exercise (HIICE) protocol consisting of four alternating bouts of 20 ​s running (R) and three bouts of bicycle exercise (BE) at ∼160% and ∼170% maximal oxygen uptake (V˙ O2max), respectively, with 10 ​s between-bout rests (sequence R-BE-R-BE-R-BE-R). The V˙ O2 during the last BE ([52.2 ​± ​5.0] mL·kg−1·min−1) was significantly higher than the V˙ O2max of the BE ([48.0 ​± ​5.4] mL·kg−1·min−1, n ​= ​30) and similar to that of running. For clarifying the underlying mechanisms, a corresponding HIICE-protocol with BE and arm cranking ergometer exercise (AC) was used (sequence AC-AC-BE-AC-BE-AC-AC-BE). In some experiments, thigh blood flow was occluded by a cuff around the upper thigh. Without occlusion, the V˙ O2 during the AC ([39.2 ​± ​7.1] mL·kg−1·min−1 [6th bout]) was significantly higher than the V˙ O2max of AC ([30.2 ​± ​4.4] mL·kg−1·min−1, n ​= ​7). With occlusion, the corresponding V˙ O2 ([29.8 ​± ​3.9] mL·kg−1·min−1) was reduced to that of the V˙ O2max of AC and significantly less than the V˙ O2 without occlusion. These findings suggest that during the last bouts of HIICE may exceed the of the specific exercise, probably because it is a summation of the V˙ O2 for the ongoing exercise plus excess post-oxygen consumption (EPOC) produced by the previous exercise with a higher V˙ O2max.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sports Medicine and Health Science
Sports Medicine and Health Science Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
55 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信