Minghang Yu, Yang Xiong, Pu Liang, Danying Chen, Yuting Zhang, Huan Liu, Yuanyuan Zhang, Xuesen Zhao, Ronghua Jin, Xi Wang
{"title":"验证用于检测 SARS-CoV-2 的 12 种快速抗原检测方法","authors":"Minghang Yu, Yang Xiong, Pu Liang, Danying Chen, Yuting Zhang, Huan Liu, Yuanyuan Zhang, Xuesen Zhao, Ronghua Jin, Xi Wang","doi":"10.14440/jbm.2024.409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rapid identification SARS-CoV-2 virus has become the basis for the control of the COVID-19 outbreak. The rapid antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2 are quick, widely available, and inexpensive. Rapid antigen tests have gradually replaced the time-consuming and costly RT-PCR. Currently, although several RAT kits have been extensively used for the diagnosis of COVID-19, validity data are limited due to the inconsistent sensitivity and poor reproducibility. Meanwhile, WHO does not recommend specific commercial RAT kits. Therefore, it is crucial to establish a method to evaluate the effectiveness of different rapid antigen tests kits. This study aimed to develop an evaluation system for rapid antigen tests to provide an efficient and accurate technique for screening SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection kits. Given large number of rapid antigen tests kits available, this study only focused on those that are representative and commonely used in China. By minimzing biases through randomization, concealment, and blinding, we eventually found that the Test 1 had the lowest sensitivity and the Test VI had the highest sensitivity. This study provided an evaluation platform that can potentially serve as a reference for COVID-19 diagnostic strategies.","PeriodicalId":73618,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biological methods","volume":"12 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of 12 Rapid Antigen Tests for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2\",\"authors\":\"Minghang Yu, Yang Xiong, Pu Liang, Danying Chen, Yuting Zhang, Huan Liu, Yuanyuan Zhang, Xuesen Zhao, Ronghua Jin, Xi Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.14440/jbm.2024.409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The rapid identification SARS-CoV-2 virus has become the basis for the control of the COVID-19 outbreak. The rapid antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2 are quick, widely available, and inexpensive. Rapid antigen tests have gradually replaced the time-consuming and costly RT-PCR. Currently, although several RAT kits have been extensively used for the diagnosis of COVID-19, validity data are limited due to the inconsistent sensitivity and poor reproducibility. Meanwhile, WHO does not recommend specific commercial RAT kits. Therefore, it is crucial to establish a method to evaluate the effectiveness of different rapid antigen tests kits. This study aimed to develop an evaluation system for rapid antigen tests to provide an efficient and accurate technique for screening SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection kits. Given large number of rapid antigen tests kits available, this study only focused on those that are representative and commonely used in China. By minimzing biases through randomization, concealment, and blinding, we eventually found that the Test 1 had the lowest sensitivity and the Test VI had the highest sensitivity. This study provided an evaluation platform that can potentially serve as a reference for COVID-19 diagnostic strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biological methods\",\"volume\":\"12 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biological methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14440/jbm.2024.409\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biological methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14440/jbm.2024.409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
快速鉴定 SARS-CoV-2 病毒已成为控制 COVID-19 爆发的基础。SARS-CoV-2 的快速抗原检测快速、广泛、廉价。快速抗原检测已逐渐取代耗时费钱的 RT-PCR。目前,虽然有几种快速抗原检测试剂盒已被广泛用于诊断 COVID-19,但由于灵敏度不一致和重现性差,有效数据有限。同时,世卫组织并未推荐特定的商业 RAT 试剂盒。因此,建立一套评估不同快速抗原检测试剂盒有效性的方法至关重要。本研究旨在开发一套快速抗原检测评估系统,为筛选 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测试剂盒提供一种高效、准确的技术。鉴于快速抗原检测试剂盒种类繁多,本研究只关注在中国具有代表性且普遍使用的试剂盒。通过随机、隐蔽和盲法将偏倚最小化,我们最终发现检测 1 的灵敏度最低,而检测 VI 的灵敏度最高。这项研究提供了一个评估平台,有可能作为 COVID-19 诊断策略的参考。
Validation of 12 Rapid Antigen Tests for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2
The rapid identification SARS-CoV-2 virus has become the basis for the control of the COVID-19 outbreak. The rapid antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2 are quick, widely available, and inexpensive. Rapid antigen tests have gradually replaced the time-consuming and costly RT-PCR. Currently, although several RAT kits have been extensively used for the diagnosis of COVID-19, validity data are limited due to the inconsistent sensitivity and poor reproducibility. Meanwhile, WHO does not recommend specific commercial RAT kits. Therefore, it is crucial to establish a method to evaluate the effectiveness of different rapid antigen tests kits. This study aimed to develop an evaluation system for rapid antigen tests to provide an efficient and accurate technique for screening SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection kits. Given large number of rapid antigen tests kits available, this study only focused on those that are representative and commonely used in China. By minimzing biases through randomization, concealment, and blinding, we eventually found that the Test 1 had the lowest sensitivity and the Test VI had the highest sensitivity. This study provided an evaluation platform that can potentially serve as a reference for COVID-19 diagnostic strategies.