蒂尔森谈宗教启蒙

IF 0.8 4区教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION Pub Date : 2024-01-12 DOI:10.1093/jopedu/qhae010

Michael Hand

{"title":"蒂尔森谈宗教启蒙","authors":"Michael Hand","doi":"10.1093/jopedu/qhae010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In Children, Religion and the Ethics of Influence, John Tillson argues that initiating children into religion is morally wrong. His argument overlaps and intersects at various points with my own argument against confessional religious education in schools. In this brief reply I consider two notable differences between our arguments.","PeriodicalId":47223,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tillson on religious initiation\",\"authors\":\"Michael Hand\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jopedu/qhae010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In Children, Religion and the Ethics of Influence, John Tillson argues that initiating children into religion is morally wrong. His argument overlaps and intersects at various points with my own argument against confessional religious education in schools. In this brief reply I consider two notable differences between our arguments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhae010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhae010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在《儿童、宗教和影响的伦理》一书中，约翰-蒂尔森认为让儿童开始接触宗教在道德上是错误的。他的论点与我反对在学校开展忏悔宗教教育的论点在不同点上有重叠和交叉。在这篇简短的答辩中，我将考虑我们论点之间的两个显著差异。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Tillson on religious initiation

In Children, Religion and the Ethics of Influence, John Tillson argues that initiating children into religion is morally wrong. His argument overlaps and intersects at various points with my own argument against confessional religious education in schools. In this brief reply I consider two notable differences between our arguments.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION Multiple-

CiteScore

2.00

自引率

10.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Journal of Philosophy of Education publishes articles representing a wide variety of philosophical traditions. They vary from examination of fundamental philosophical issues in their connection with education, to detailed critical engagement with current educational practice or policy from a philosophical point of view. The journal aims to promote rigorous thinking on educational matters and to identify and criticise the ideological forces shaping education. Ethical, political, aesthetic and epistemological dimensions of educational theory are amongst those covered.