Cassidy Sim, Diego Moya, B. Biligetu, Gabriel O. Ribeiro, D. Damiran, H. Lardner
{"title":"在集约化放牧条件下,评估作为单作和豆科-禾本科二元混合物的冷季型多年生牧草品种","authors":"Cassidy Sim, Diego Moya, B. Biligetu, Gabriel O. Ribeiro, D. Damiran, H. Lardner","doi":"10.1139/cjas-2023-0093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Canada, new forage varieties need not undergo grazing trials before registration and sale. To evaluate the effect of grazing, six cool-season species including meadow bromegrass ( Bromus riparius Rehmann), orchardgrass ( Dactylis glomerata L.), sainfoin ( Onobrychis viciifoila Scop.), and three alfalfa varieties ( Medicago sativa L.) were established in monocultures and grass–legume binary mixtures in Saskatchewan, Canada. Forage treatments were randomly established within each of three 3.5 ha paddock replicates. In Year 1, 69 Bos taurus crossbred steers, and in Year 2, 149 steers were homogenously allocated to the three paddocks for the grazing trials. Alfalfa monocultures had the greatest ( p < 0.05) pre-graze forage yields and crude protein content. Leaf area index was greater in alfalfa monocultures than in all other treatments ( p < 0.01). Etiolated growth differed ( p < 0.05) among binary mixtures but not monocultures. Alfalfa monoculture stands were preferred over grass monocultures and most grass–legume mixtures, and sainfoin was avoided relative to alfalfa. Killarney orchardgrass was the least productive and least preferred among forages evaluated. In summary, alfalfa monocultures had greater ( p < 0.05) forage yields and quality than sainfoin monocultures, grass–legume binary mixtures, or grass monocultures.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":"15 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of cool-season perennial forage varieties as monocultures and legume–grass binary mixtures under intensive grazing\",\"authors\":\"Cassidy Sim, Diego Moya, B. Biligetu, Gabriel O. Ribeiro, D. Damiran, H. Lardner\",\"doi\":\"10.1139/cjas-2023-0093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Canada, new forage varieties need not undergo grazing trials before registration and sale. To evaluate the effect of grazing, six cool-season species including meadow bromegrass ( Bromus riparius Rehmann), orchardgrass ( Dactylis glomerata L.), sainfoin ( Onobrychis viciifoila Scop.), and three alfalfa varieties ( Medicago sativa L.) were established in monocultures and grass–legume binary mixtures in Saskatchewan, Canada. Forage treatments were randomly established within each of three 3.5 ha paddock replicates. In Year 1, 69 Bos taurus crossbred steers, and in Year 2, 149 steers were homogenously allocated to the three paddocks for the grazing trials. Alfalfa monocultures had the greatest ( p < 0.05) pre-graze forage yields and crude protein content. Leaf area index was greater in alfalfa monocultures than in all other treatments ( p < 0.01). Etiolated growth differed ( p < 0.05) among binary mixtures but not monocultures. Alfalfa monoculture stands were preferred over grass monocultures and most grass–legume mixtures, and sainfoin was avoided relative to alfalfa. Killarney orchardgrass was the least productive and least preferred among forages evaluated. In summary, alfalfa monocultures had greater ( p < 0.05) forage yields and quality than sainfoin monocultures, grass–legume binary mixtures, or grass monocultures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":\"15 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2023-0093\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2023-0093","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of cool-season perennial forage varieties as monocultures and legume–grass binary mixtures under intensive grazing
In Canada, new forage varieties need not undergo grazing trials before registration and sale. To evaluate the effect of grazing, six cool-season species including meadow bromegrass ( Bromus riparius Rehmann), orchardgrass ( Dactylis glomerata L.), sainfoin ( Onobrychis viciifoila Scop.), and three alfalfa varieties ( Medicago sativa L.) were established in monocultures and grass–legume binary mixtures in Saskatchewan, Canada. Forage treatments were randomly established within each of three 3.5 ha paddock replicates. In Year 1, 69 Bos taurus crossbred steers, and in Year 2, 149 steers were homogenously allocated to the three paddocks for the grazing trials. Alfalfa monocultures had the greatest ( p < 0.05) pre-graze forage yields and crude protein content. Leaf area index was greater in alfalfa monocultures than in all other treatments ( p < 0.01). Etiolated growth differed ( p < 0.05) among binary mixtures but not monocultures. Alfalfa monoculture stands were preferred over grass monocultures and most grass–legume mixtures, and sainfoin was avoided relative to alfalfa. Killarney orchardgrass was the least productive and least preferred among forages evaluated. In summary, alfalfa monocultures had greater ( p < 0.05) forage yields and quality than sainfoin monocultures, grass–legume binary mixtures, or grass monocultures.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.