Shanshan Wu, Zhen Guo, Bin Luo, Lei Qin, Chenglong Wu, Zigen Wei, Pengfei Ren, Haiying Yu
{"title":"从 P 波和雷电波极化分析看青藏高原东北部 CHINArray-II 传感器的方位问题","authors":"Shanshan Wu, Zhen Guo, Bin Luo, Lei Qin, Chenglong Wu, Zigen Wei, Pengfei Ren, Haiying Yu","doi":"10.1785/0220230328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Accurate sensor orientation is important in providing reliable data used for seismological analysis such as P-wave receiver function analysis, shear-wave splitting, and ambient noise analysis. In this study, we used three distinct P-wave and Rayleigh-wave polarization analysis methods to estimate actual sensor orientation of 660 stations from CHINArray-II in northeastern margin of Tibetan plateau. We found that ∼42.12%–45.76% of the stations are well oriented with the absolute misorientation angle <3°, 42.42%–45.45% of the stations are fairly oriented with the absolute misorientation angle ranging from 3° to 10°, and 8.94%–11.82% of the stations are oriented with the absolute misorientation angle >10°. We further compared the results of some seismological analyses before and after sensor misorientation correction, such as Rayleigh-wave ellipticity (horizontal-to-vertical ratio) and P-wave receiver functions analysis. We found that when the sensor misorientation angle is large, it may lead to incorrect seismological results. With the same sensor misorientation, its influence on different seismological analysis is also different.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensor Misorientation of CHINArray-II in Northeastern Tibetan Plateau from P- and Rayleigh-Wave Polarization Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Shanshan Wu, Zhen Guo, Bin Luo, Lei Qin, Chenglong Wu, Zigen Wei, Pengfei Ren, Haiying Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1785/0220230328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Accurate sensor orientation is important in providing reliable data used for seismological analysis such as P-wave receiver function analysis, shear-wave splitting, and ambient noise analysis. In this study, we used three distinct P-wave and Rayleigh-wave polarization analysis methods to estimate actual sensor orientation of 660 stations from CHINArray-II in northeastern margin of Tibetan plateau. We found that ∼42.12%–45.76% of the stations are well oriented with the absolute misorientation angle <3°, 42.42%–45.45% of the stations are fairly oriented with the absolute misorientation angle ranging from 3° to 10°, and 8.94%–11.82% of the stations are oriented with the absolute misorientation angle >10°. We further compared the results of some seismological analyses before and after sensor misorientation correction, such as Rayleigh-wave ellipticity (horizontal-to-vertical ratio) and P-wave receiver functions analysis. We found that when the sensor misorientation angle is large, it may lead to incorrect seismological results. With the same sensor misorientation, its influence on different seismological analysis is also different.\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1785/0220230328\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1785/0220230328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
准确的传感器方位对于提供用于地震学分析(如 P 波接收函数分析、剪切波分裂和环境噪声分析)的可靠数据非常重要。在本研究中,我们使用了三种不同的 P 波和雷利波极化分析方法来估算位于青藏高原东北边缘的 CHINArray-II 中 660 个台站的实际传感器方位。我们发现,42.12%~45.76%的台站方位良好,绝对偏差角为 10°。我们进一步比较了一些地震学分析结果,如雷波椭圆度(水平-垂直比)和 P 波接收函数分析等。我们发现,当传感器错向角较大时,可能会导致地震学结果错误。同样的传感器偏角,对不同地震学分析的影响也是不同的。
Sensor Misorientation of CHINArray-II in Northeastern Tibetan Plateau from P- and Rayleigh-Wave Polarization Analysis
Accurate sensor orientation is important in providing reliable data used for seismological analysis such as P-wave receiver function analysis, shear-wave splitting, and ambient noise analysis. In this study, we used three distinct P-wave and Rayleigh-wave polarization analysis methods to estimate actual sensor orientation of 660 stations from CHINArray-II in northeastern margin of Tibetan plateau. We found that ∼42.12%–45.76% of the stations are well oriented with the absolute misorientation angle <3°, 42.42%–45.45% of the stations are fairly oriented with the absolute misorientation angle ranging from 3° to 10°, and 8.94%–11.82% of the stations are oriented with the absolute misorientation angle >10°. We further compared the results of some seismological analyses before and after sensor misorientation correction, such as Rayleigh-wave ellipticity (horizontal-to-vertical ratio) and P-wave receiver functions analysis. We found that when the sensor misorientation angle is large, it may lead to incorrect seismological results. With the same sensor misorientation, its influence on different seismological analysis is also different.