Georgina Waldo-Benítez, Luis Carlos Padierna, Pablo Cerón, Modesto A Sosa
{"title":"胶质母细胞瘤磁共振图像中的机器学习:综述。","authors":"Georgina Waldo-Benítez, Luis Carlos Padierna, Pablo Cerón, Modesto A Sosa","doi":"10.2174/0115734056265212231122102029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this work was to identify which Glioblastoma (GBM) problems can be handled by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Machine Learning (ML) techniques. Results, limitations, and trends through a review of the scientific literature in the last 5 years were performed. Google Scholar, PubMed, Elsevier databases, and forward and backward citations were used for searching articles applying ML techniques in GBM. The 50 most relevant papers fulfilling the selection criteria were deeply analyzed. The PRISMA statement was followed to structure our report.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A partial taxonomy of the GBM problems tackled with ML methods was formulated with 15 subcategories grouped into four categories: extraction of characteristics from tumoral regions, differentiation, characterization, and problems based on genetics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The dominant techniques in solving these problems are: Radiomics for feature extraction, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator for feature selection, Support Vector Machines and Random Forest for classification, and Convolutional Neural Networks for characterization. A noticeable trend is that the application of Deep Learning on GBM problems is growing exponentially. The main limitations of ML methods are their interpretability and generalization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The diagnosis, treatment, and characterization of GBM have advanced with the aid of ML methods and MRI data, and this improvement is expected to continue. ML methods are effective in solving GBM-related problems with different precisions, Overall Survival being the hardest problem to solve with accuracies ranging from 57%-71%, and GBM differentiation the one with the highest accuracy ranging from 80%-97%.</p>","PeriodicalId":54215,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning in Magnetic Resonance Images of Glioblastoma: A Review.\",\"authors\":\"Georgina Waldo-Benítez, Luis Carlos Padierna, Pablo Cerón, Modesto A Sosa\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0115734056265212231122102029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this work was to identify which Glioblastoma (GBM) problems can be handled by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Machine Learning (ML) techniques. Results, limitations, and trends through a review of the scientific literature in the last 5 years were performed. Google Scholar, PubMed, Elsevier databases, and forward and backward citations were used for searching articles applying ML techniques in GBM. The 50 most relevant papers fulfilling the selection criteria were deeply analyzed. The PRISMA statement was followed to structure our report.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A partial taxonomy of the GBM problems tackled with ML methods was formulated with 15 subcategories grouped into four categories: extraction of characteristics from tumoral regions, differentiation, characterization, and problems based on genetics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The dominant techniques in solving these problems are: Radiomics for feature extraction, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator for feature selection, Support Vector Machines and Random Forest for classification, and Convolutional Neural Networks for characterization. A noticeable trend is that the application of Deep Learning on GBM problems is growing exponentially. The main limitations of ML methods are their interpretability and generalization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The diagnosis, treatment, and characterization of GBM have advanced with the aid of ML methods and MRI data, and this improvement is expected to continue. ML methods are effective in solving GBM-related problems with different precisions, Overall Survival being the hardest problem to solve with accuracies ranging from 57%-71%, and GBM differentiation the one with the highest accuracy ranging from 80%-97%.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Medical Imaging Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Medical Imaging Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056265212231122102029\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056265212231122102029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:这项工作的目的是确定哪些胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)问题可以通过磁共振成像(MRI)和机器学习(ML)技术来处理。通过对过去 5 年的科学文献进行回顾,得出了结果、局限性和趋势。我们使用谷歌学术、PubMed、Elsevier 数据库以及正向和反向引用来搜索将 ML 技术应用于 GBM 的文章。对符合选择标准的 50 篇最相关的论文进行了深入分析。我们在撰写报告时遵循了 PRISMA 声明:方法:对使用 ML 方法解决的 GBM 问题进行了部分分类,将 15 个子类别分为四类:从肿瘤区域提取特征、分化、特征描述和基于遗传学的问题:结果:解决这些问题的主要技术有结果:解决这些问题的主要技术有:用于特征提取的放射组学、用于特征选择的最小绝对收缩和选择操作器、用于分类的支持向量机和随机森林,以及用于特征描述的卷积神经网络。一个明显的趋势是,深度学习在 GBM 问题上的应用呈指数级增长。ML 方法的主要局限性在于其可解释性和泛化性:结论:借助 ML 方法和 MRI 数据,GBM 的诊断、治疗和特征描述取得了进展,而且这种进展有望持续下去。ML方法在解决GBM相关问题时具有不同的精确度,总体生存是最难解决的问题,精确度在57%-71%之间,而GBM分化是精确度最高的问题,精确度在80%-97%之间。
Machine Learning in Magnetic Resonance Images of Glioblastoma: A Review.
Background: The purpose of this work was to identify which Glioblastoma (GBM) problems can be handled by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Machine Learning (ML) techniques. Results, limitations, and trends through a review of the scientific literature in the last 5 years were performed. Google Scholar, PubMed, Elsevier databases, and forward and backward citations were used for searching articles applying ML techniques in GBM. The 50 most relevant papers fulfilling the selection criteria were deeply analyzed. The PRISMA statement was followed to structure our report.
Methods: A partial taxonomy of the GBM problems tackled with ML methods was formulated with 15 subcategories grouped into four categories: extraction of characteristics from tumoral regions, differentiation, characterization, and problems based on genetics.
Results: The dominant techniques in solving these problems are: Radiomics for feature extraction, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator for feature selection, Support Vector Machines and Random Forest for classification, and Convolutional Neural Networks for characterization. A noticeable trend is that the application of Deep Learning on GBM problems is growing exponentially. The main limitations of ML methods are their interpretability and generalization.
Conclusion: The diagnosis, treatment, and characterization of GBM have advanced with the aid of ML methods and MRI data, and this improvement is expected to continue. ML methods are effective in solving GBM-related problems with different precisions, Overall Survival being the hardest problem to solve with accuracies ranging from 57%-71%, and GBM differentiation the one with the highest accuracy ranging from 80%-97%.
期刊介绍:
Current Medical Imaging Reviews publishes frontier review articles, original research articles, drug clinical trial studies and guest edited thematic issues on all the latest advances on medical imaging dedicated to clinical research. All relevant areas are covered by the journal, including advances in the diagnosis, instrumentation and therapeutic applications related to all modern medical imaging techniques.
The journal is essential reading for all clinicians and researchers involved in medical imaging and diagnosis.