评估脑外伤后疗效的 GCS-Pupils (GCS-P) 评分:一项回顾性研究。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
British Journal of Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-23 DOI:10.1080/02688697.2023.2301071
Vito Ambesi, Charne Miller, Mark C Fitzgerald, Biswadev Mitra
{"title":"评估脑外伤后疗效的 GCS-Pupils (GCS-P) 评分:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Vito Ambesi, Charne Miller, Mark C Fitzgerald, Biswadev Mitra","doi":"10.1080/02688697.2023.2301071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and pupil response to light are commonly used to assess brain injury severity and predict outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the GCS combined with pupil response (GCS-P), compared to the GCS alone, could be a better predictor of hospital mortality for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was undertaken at an adult level one trauma centre including patients with isolated TBI of Abbreviated Injury Scale above three. The GCS and pupil response were combined to an arithmetic score (GCS score (range 3-15) minus the number of nonreacting pupils (0, 1, or 2)), or by treating each factor as separate categorical variables. The association of in-hospital mortality with GCS-P as a categorical variable was evaluated using Nagelkerke's <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> and compared using areas under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 392 patients included over the study period of 1 July 2014 and 30 September 2017, with an overall mortality rate of 15.2%. Mortality was highest at GCS-P of 1 (79%), with lowest mortality at a GCS-P 15 (1.6%). Nagelkerke's <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> was 0.427 for GCS alone and 0.486 for GCS-P. The AUROC for GCS-P to predict mortality was 0.87 (95%CI: 0.82-0.72), higher than for GCS alone (0.85; 95%CI: 0.80-0.90; <i>p</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>GCS-P provided a better predictor of mortality compared to the GCS. As both the GCS and pupillary response are routinely recorded on all patients, combination of these pieces of information into a single score can further simplify assessment of patients with TBI, with some improvement in performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":9261,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"620-623"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The GCS-Pupils (GCS-P) score to assess outcomes after traumatic brain injury: a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Vito Ambesi, Charne Miller, Mark C Fitzgerald, Biswadev Mitra\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02688697.2023.2301071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and pupil response to light are commonly used to assess brain injury severity and predict outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the GCS combined with pupil response (GCS-P), compared to the GCS alone, could be a better predictor of hospital mortality for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was undertaken at an adult level one trauma centre including patients with isolated TBI of Abbreviated Injury Scale above three. The GCS and pupil response were combined to an arithmetic score (GCS score (range 3-15) minus the number of nonreacting pupils (0, 1, or 2)), or by treating each factor as separate categorical variables. The association of in-hospital mortality with GCS-P as a categorical variable was evaluated using Nagelkerke's <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> and compared using areas under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 392 patients included over the study period of 1 July 2014 and 30 September 2017, with an overall mortality rate of 15.2%. Mortality was highest at GCS-P of 1 (79%), with lowest mortality at a GCS-P 15 (1.6%). Nagelkerke's <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> was 0.427 for GCS alone and 0.486 for GCS-P. The AUROC for GCS-P to predict mortality was 0.87 (95%CI: 0.82-0.72), higher than for GCS alone (0.85; 95%CI: 0.80-0.90; <i>p</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>GCS-P provided a better predictor of mortality compared to the GCS. As both the GCS and pupillary response are routinely recorded on all patients, combination of these pieces of information into a single score can further simplify assessment of patients with TBI, with some improvement in performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"620-623\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2023.2301071\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2023.2301071","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)和瞳孔对光的反应通常用于评估脑损伤的严重程度和预测预后。本研究旨在探讨与单独使用 GCS 相比,GCS 结合瞳孔反应(GCS-P)是否能更好地预测创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的住院死亡率:在成人一级创伤中心进行了一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象包括简略损伤量表超过三级的孤立性创伤性脑损伤患者。将 GCS 和瞳孔反应合并为算术分数(GCS 分数(范围 3-15)减去无反应瞳孔数(0、1 或 2)),或将每个因素视为单独的分类变量。院内死亡率与作为分类变量的GCS-P的关系使用纳格尔克尔克R2进行评估,并使用接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)进行比较:在2014年7月1日至2017年9月30日的研究期间,共纳入392名患者,总死亡率为15.2%。GCS-P为1时死亡率最高(79%),GCS-P为15时死亡率最低(1.6%)。单纯 GCS 的 Nagelkerke R2 为 0.427,GCS-P 为 0.486。GCS-P 预测死亡率的 AUROC 为 0.87(95%CI:0.82-0.72),高于单纯 GCS(0.85;95%CI:0.80-0.90;P 讨论:与 GCS 相比,GCS-P 能更好地预测死亡率。由于所有患者的 GCS 和瞳孔反应都会被常规记录,将这些信息合并成一个单一的评分可以进一步简化对创伤性脑损伤患者的评估,并在一定程度上提高评估效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The GCS-Pupils (GCS-P) score to assess outcomes after traumatic brain injury: a retrospective study.

Introduction: The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and pupil response to light are commonly used to assess brain injury severity and predict outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the GCS combined with pupil response (GCS-P), compared to the GCS alone, could be a better predictor of hospital mortality for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was undertaken at an adult level one trauma centre including patients with isolated TBI of Abbreviated Injury Scale above three. The GCS and pupil response were combined to an arithmetic score (GCS score (range 3-15) minus the number of nonreacting pupils (0, 1, or 2)), or by treating each factor as separate categorical variables. The association of in-hospital mortality with GCS-P as a categorical variable was evaluated using Nagelkerke's R2 and compared using areas under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve.

Results: There were 392 patients included over the study period of 1 July 2014 and 30 September 2017, with an overall mortality rate of 15.2%. Mortality was highest at GCS-P of 1 (79%), with lowest mortality at a GCS-P 15 (1.6%). Nagelkerke's R2 was 0.427 for GCS alone and 0.486 for GCS-P. The AUROC for GCS-P to predict mortality was 0.87 (95%CI: 0.82-0.72), higher than for GCS alone (0.85; 95%CI: 0.80-0.90; p < .001).

Discussion: GCS-P provided a better predictor of mortality compared to the GCS. As both the GCS and pupillary response are routinely recorded on all patients, combination of these pieces of information into a single score can further simplify assessment of patients with TBI, with some improvement in performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Neurosurgery
British Journal of Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
139
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Neurosurgery is a leading international forum for debate in the field of neurosurgery, publishing original peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality, along with comment and correspondence on all topics of current interest to neurosurgeons worldwide. Coverage includes all aspects of case assessment and surgical practice, as well as wide-ranging research, with an emphasis on clinical rather than experimental material. Special emphasis is placed on postgraduate education with review articles on basic neurosciences and on the theory behind advances in techniques, investigation and clinical management. All papers are submitted to rigorous and independent peer-review, ensuring the journal’s wide citation and its appearance in the major abstracting and indexing services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信