关于膀胱癌新辅助化疗适应性的经验调查。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Urologia Internationalis Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1159/000536321
Moritz J Reike, Alina Reicherz, Karl H Tully, Henning Bahlburg, Moritz Maas, Peter Bach, Niklas Klümper, Markus Eckstein, Arndt Hartmann, Johannes Breyer, Philipp Erben, Christian Bolenz, Joachim Noldus, Sebastian Berg, Florian Roghmann
{"title":"关于膀胱癌新辅助化疗适应性的经验调查。","authors":"Moritz J Reike, Alina Reicherz, Karl H Tully, Henning Bahlburg, Moritz Maas, Peter Bach, Niklas Klümper, Markus Eckstein, Arndt Hartmann, Johannes Breyer, Philipp Erben, Christian Bolenz, Joachim Noldus, Sebastian Berg, Florian Roghmann","doi":"10.1159/000536321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of the study was to determine the adaption of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland and especially underlying reasons for potential low adherence to guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a non-validated survey among 336 urologic departments in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. RedCap questionnaires were electronically distributed and included 23 items concerning the general NAC administration standards and guideline compliance in patient counseling regarding the actual treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The return rate of the questionnaire was 19.1% (63/336). Although 45 departments (71.4%) claim to perform NAC as the standard of care, only 49% of eligible patients actually receive NAC. An advanced disease stage (≥cT3) and a high tumor volume were mentioned to support the application of NAC, whereas 35% of responders worry about deterioration of patients' preoperative status due to NAC. Furthermore, 26.7% of respondents are concerned about the low extent of survival benefit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Application of NAC in eligible MIBC patients in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland remains low. Although the majority of urologic departments discuss NAC and acknowledge the need for intensified treatment in advanced disease stages, not all eligible patients will actually receive NAC before radical cystectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23414,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Internationalis","volume":" ","pages":"183-189"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Empirical Survey on the Adaption of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Bladder Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Moritz J Reike, Alina Reicherz, Karl H Tully, Henning Bahlburg, Moritz Maas, Peter Bach, Niklas Klümper, Markus Eckstein, Arndt Hartmann, Johannes Breyer, Philipp Erben, Christian Bolenz, Joachim Noldus, Sebastian Berg, Florian Roghmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000536321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of the study was to determine the adaption of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland and especially underlying reasons for potential low adherence to guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a non-validated survey among 336 urologic departments in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. RedCap questionnaires were electronically distributed and included 23 items concerning the general NAC administration standards and guideline compliance in patient counseling regarding the actual treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The return rate of the questionnaire was 19.1% (63/336). Although 45 departments (71.4%) claim to perform NAC as the standard of care, only 49% of eligible patients actually receive NAC. An advanced disease stage (≥cT3) and a high tumor volume were mentioned to support the application of NAC, whereas 35% of responders worry about deterioration of patients' preoperative status due to NAC. Furthermore, 26.7% of respondents are concerned about the low extent of survival benefit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Application of NAC in eligible MIBC patients in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland remains low. Although the majority of urologic departments discuss NAC and acknowledge the need for intensified treatment in advanced disease stages, not all eligible patients will actually receive NAC before radical cystectomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologia Internationalis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"183-189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologia Internationalis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000536321\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Internationalis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000536321","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的确定德国、奥地利和瑞士的肌层浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)患者对新辅助化疗(NAC)的适应情况,尤其是对指南遵守率低的潜在原因:我们对德国、奥地利和瑞士的 336 个泌尿科部门进行了一项未经验证的调查。通过电子方式发放了 RedCap 问卷,其中包括 23 个项目,涉及新农合的一般管理标准以及患者咨询实际治疗过程中对指南的遵守情况:问卷回收率为 19.1%(63/336)。虽然有 45 个科室(71.4%)声称将新农合作为标准治疗,但只有 49% 的合格患者实际接受了新农合治疗。受访者提到,晚期疾病分期(≥cT3)和肿瘤体积大是支持应用 NAC 的原因,而 35% 的受访者担心 NAC 会导致患者术前状况恶化。此外,26.7% 的受访者担心患者的生存获益程度较低:结论:在德国、奥地利和瑞士,NAC在符合条件的MIBC患者中的应用率仍然很低。结论:在德国、奥地利和瑞士,符合条件的 MIBC 患者接受 NAC 治疗的比例仍然很低。尽管大多数泌尿科部门都在讨论 NAC,并承认需要在疾病晚期加强治疗,但实际上并非所有符合条件的患者都会在根治性膀胱切除术前接受 NAC 治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Empirical Survey on the Adaption of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Bladder Cancer.

Introduction: The aim of the study was to determine the adaption of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland and especially underlying reasons for potential low adherence to guidelines.

Methods: We conducted a non-validated survey among 336 urologic departments in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. RedCap questionnaires were electronically distributed and included 23 items concerning the general NAC administration standards and guideline compliance in patient counseling regarding the actual treatment.

Results: The return rate of the questionnaire was 19.1% (63/336). Although 45 departments (71.4%) claim to perform NAC as the standard of care, only 49% of eligible patients actually receive NAC. An advanced disease stage (≥cT3) and a high tumor volume were mentioned to support the application of NAC, whereas 35% of responders worry about deterioration of patients' preoperative status due to NAC. Furthermore, 26.7% of respondents are concerned about the low extent of survival benefit.

Conclusion: Application of NAC in eligible MIBC patients in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland remains low. Although the majority of urologic departments discuss NAC and acknowledge the need for intensified treatment in advanced disease stages, not all eligible patients will actually receive NAC before radical cystectomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urologia Internationalis
Urologia Internationalis 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
94
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Concise but fully substantiated international reports of clinically oriented research into science and current management of urogenital disorders form the nucleus of original as well as basic research papers. These are supplemented by up-to-date reviews by international experts on the state-of-the-art of key topics of clinical urological practice. Essential topics receiving regular coverage include the introduction of new techniques and instrumentation as well as the evaluation of new functional tests and diagnostic methods. Special attention is given to advances in surgical techniques and clinical oncology. The regular publication of selected case reports represents the great variation in urological disease and illustrates treatment solutions in singular cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信