区分宽 QRS 心动过速的机器学习方法:区分室性心动过速和室上性心动过速。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Zhen-Zhen Li, Wei Zhao, YangMing Mao, Dan Bo, QiuShi Chen, Pipin Kojodjojo, FengXiang Zhang
{"title":"区分宽 QRS 心动过速的机器学习方法:区分室性心动过速和室上性心动过速。","authors":"Zhen-Zhen Li, Wei Zhao, YangMing Mao, Dan Bo, QiuShi Chen, Pipin Kojodjojo, FengXiang Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s10840-024-01743-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Differential diagnosis of wide QRS tachycardia (WQCT) has been a challenging issue. Published algorithms to distinguish ventricular tachycardia (VT) and supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) have limited diagnostic capabilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 278 patients with WQCT from January 2010 to March 2022 were enrolled. The electrophysiological study confirmed SVT in 154 patients and VT in 65 ones. Two hundred nineteen WQCT 12-lead ECGs were randomly divided into development cohort (n = 165) and testing cohort (n = 54) data sets. The development cohort was split into a training group (n = 115) and an internal validation group (n = 50). Forty ECG features extracted from the 219 WQCT ECGs are fed into 9 iteratively trained ML algorithms. This novel ML algorithm was also compared with four published algorithms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the development cohort, the Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) model displayed the maximum area under curve (AUC) (0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-1.00). In the testing cohort, the GBM model had a higher AUC of 0.97 compared to 4 validated ECG algorithms, namely, Brugada (0.68), avR (0.62), RWPTII (0.72), and LLA algorithms (0.70). Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of the GBM model were 0.94, 0.97, 0.90, 0.94, and 0.95, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A GBM ML model contributes to distinguishing SVT from VT based on surface ECG features. In addition, we were able to identify important indicators for distinguishing WQCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":16202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A machine learning approach to differentiate wide QRS tachycardia: distinguishing ventricular tachycardia from supraventricular tachycardia.\",\"authors\":\"Zhen-Zhen Li, Wei Zhao, YangMing Mao, Dan Bo, QiuShi Chen, Pipin Kojodjojo, FengXiang Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10840-024-01743-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Differential diagnosis of wide QRS tachycardia (WQCT) has been a challenging issue. Published algorithms to distinguish ventricular tachycardia (VT) and supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) have limited diagnostic capabilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 278 patients with WQCT from January 2010 to March 2022 were enrolled. The electrophysiological study confirmed SVT in 154 patients and VT in 65 ones. Two hundred nineteen WQCT 12-lead ECGs were randomly divided into development cohort (n = 165) and testing cohort (n = 54) data sets. The development cohort was split into a training group (n = 115) and an internal validation group (n = 50). Forty ECG features extracted from the 219 WQCT ECGs are fed into 9 iteratively trained ML algorithms. This novel ML algorithm was also compared with four published algorithms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the development cohort, the Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) model displayed the maximum area under curve (AUC) (0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-1.00). In the testing cohort, the GBM model had a higher AUC of 0.97 compared to 4 validated ECG algorithms, namely, Brugada (0.68), avR (0.62), RWPTII (0.72), and LLA algorithms (0.70). Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of the GBM model were 0.94, 0.97, 0.90, 0.94, and 0.95, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A GBM ML model contributes to distinguishing SVT from VT based on surface ECG features. In addition, we were able to identify important indicators for distinguishing WQCT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-024-01743-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-024-01743-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:宽QRS心动过速(WQCT)的鉴别诊断一直是一个具有挑战性的问题。已公布的室性心动过速(VT)和室上性心动过速(SVT)鉴别算法的诊断能力有限:方法: 2010年1月至2022年3月期间,共有278名WQCT患者入选。电生理研究证实,154 名患者为 SVT,65 名患者为 VT。219 份 WQCT 12 导联心电图被随机分为开发队列(165 人)和测试队列(54 人)数据集。开发组分为训练组(n = 115)和内部验证组(n = 50)。从 219 份 WQCT 心电图中提取的 40 个心电图特征被输入到 9 个迭代训练的 ML 算法中。该新型 ML 算法还与已发布的四种算法进行了比较:在开发队列中,梯度提升机(GBM)模型显示出最大的曲线下面积(AUC)(0.91,95% 置信区间(CI)0.81-1.00)。在测试队列中,GBM 模型的 AUC 为 0.97,高于 4 种经过验证的心电图算法,即 Brugada 算法(0.68)、avR 算法(0.62)、RWPTII 算法(0.72)和 LLA 算法(0.70)。GBM模型的准确性、灵敏度、特异性、阴性预测值和阳性预测值分别为0.94、0.97、0.90、0.94和0.95:基于表面心电图特征的 GBM ML 模型有助于区分 SVT 和 VT。结论:基于表面心电图特征的 GBM ML 模型有助于区分 SVT 和 VT,此外,我们还能识别出区分 WQCT 的重要指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A machine learning approach to differentiate wide QRS tachycardia: distinguishing ventricular tachycardia from supraventricular tachycardia.

A machine learning approach to differentiate wide QRS tachycardia: distinguishing ventricular tachycardia from supraventricular tachycardia.

Background: Differential diagnosis of wide QRS tachycardia (WQCT) has been a challenging issue. Published algorithms to distinguish ventricular tachycardia (VT) and supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) have limited diagnostic capabilities.

Methods: A total of 278 patients with WQCT from January 2010 to March 2022 were enrolled. The electrophysiological study confirmed SVT in 154 patients and VT in 65 ones. Two hundred nineteen WQCT 12-lead ECGs were randomly divided into development cohort (n = 165) and testing cohort (n = 54) data sets. The development cohort was split into a training group (n = 115) and an internal validation group (n = 50). Forty ECG features extracted from the 219 WQCT ECGs are fed into 9 iteratively trained ML algorithms. This novel ML algorithm was also compared with four published algorithms.

Results: In the development cohort, the Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) model displayed the maximum area under curve (AUC) (0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-1.00). In the testing cohort, the GBM model had a higher AUC of 0.97 compared to 4 validated ECG algorithms, namely, Brugada (0.68), avR (0.62), RWPTII (0.72), and LLA algorithms (0.70). Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of the GBM model were 0.94, 0.97, 0.90, 0.94, and 0.95, respectively.

Conclusions: A GBM ML model contributes to distinguishing SVT from VT based on surface ECG features. In addition, we were able to identify important indicators for distinguishing WQCT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
320
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology is an international publication devoted to fostering research in and development of interventional techniques and therapies for the management of cardiac arrhythmias. It is designed primarily to present original research studies and scholarly scientific reviews of basic and applied science and clinical research in this field. The Journal will adopt a multidisciplinary approach to link physical, experimental, and clinical sciences as applied to the development of and practice in interventional electrophysiology. The Journal will examine techniques ranging from molecular, chemical and pharmacologic therapies to device and ablation technology. Accordingly, original research in clinical, epidemiologic and basic science arenas will be considered for publication. Applied engineering or physical science studies pertaining to interventional electrophysiology will be encouraged. The Journal is committed to providing comprehensive and detailed treatment of major interventional therapies and innovative techniques in a structured and clinically relevant manner. It is directed at clinical practitioners and investigators in the rapidly growing field of interventional electrophysiology. The editorial staff and board reflect this bias and include noted international experts in this area with a wealth of expertise in basic and clinical investigation. Peer review of all submissions, conflict of interest guidelines and periodic editorial board review of all Journal policies have been established.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信