经颅磁刺激和脑深部刺激作为强迫症治疗方案的前景与挑战。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-06 DOI:10.1080/14737175.2024.2306875
Nicola Acevedo, David Castle, Susan Rossell
{"title":"经颅磁刺激和脑深部刺激作为强迫症治疗方案的前景与挑战。","authors":"Nicola Acevedo, David Castle, Susan Rossell","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2306875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) represents a complex and often difficult to treat disorder. Pharmacological and psychotherapeutic interventions are often associated with sub-optimal outcomes, and 40-60% of patients are resistant to first line therapies and thus left with few treatment options. OCD is underpinned by aberrant neurocircuitry within cortical, striatal, and thalamic brain networks. Considering the neurocircuitry impairments that underlie OCD symptomology, neurostimulation therapies provide an opportunity to modulate psychopathology in a personalized manner. Also, by probing pathological neural networks, enhanced understanding of disease states can be obtained.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This perspective discusses the clinical efficacy of TMS and DBS therapies, treatment access options, and considerations and challenges in managing patients. Recent scientific progress is discussed, with a focus on neurocircuitry and biopsychosocial aspects. Translational recommendations and suggestions for future research are provided.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>There is robust evidence to support TMS and DBS as an efficacious therapy for treatment resistant OCD patients supported by an excellent safety profile and favorable health economic data. Despite a great need for alternative therapies for chronic and severe OCD patients, resistance toward neurostimulation therapies from regulatory bodies and the psychiatric community remains. The authors contend for greater access to TMS and DBS for treatment resistant OCD patients at specialized sites with appropriate clinical resources, particularly considering adjunct and follow-up care. Also, connectome targeting has shown robust predictive ability of symptom improvements and holds potential in advancing personalized neurostimulation therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"145-158"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The promise and challenges of transcranial magnetic stimulation and deep brain stimulation as therapeutic options for obsessive-compulsive disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Nicola Acevedo, David Castle, Susan Rossell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737175.2024.2306875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) represents a complex and often difficult to treat disorder. Pharmacological and psychotherapeutic interventions are often associated with sub-optimal outcomes, and 40-60% of patients are resistant to first line therapies and thus left with few treatment options. OCD is underpinned by aberrant neurocircuitry within cortical, striatal, and thalamic brain networks. Considering the neurocircuitry impairments that underlie OCD symptomology, neurostimulation therapies provide an opportunity to modulate psychopathology in a personalized manner. Also, by probing pathological neural networks, enhanced understanding of disease states can be obtained.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This perspective discusses the clinical efficacy of TMS and DBS therapies, treatment access options, and considerations and challenges in managing patients. Recent scientific progress is discussed, with a focus on neurocircuitry and biopsychosocial aspects. Translational recommendations and suggestions for future research are provided.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>There is robust evidence to support TMS and DBS as an efficacious therapy for treatment resistant OCD patients supported by an excellent safety profile and favorable health economic data. Despite a great need for alternative therapies for chronic and severe OCD patients, resistance toward neurostimulation therapies from regulatory bodies and the psychiatric community remains. The authors contend for greater access to TMS and DBS for treatment resistant OCD patients at specialized sites with appropriate clinical resources, particularly considering adjunct and follow-up care. Also, connectome targeting has shown robust predictive ability of symptom improvements and holds potential in advancing personalized neurostimulation therapies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"145-158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2024.2306875\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2024.2306875","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:强迫症(OCD)是一种复杂且往往难以治疗的疾病。药物和心理治疗干预往往达不到最佳疗效,40%-60%的患者对一线疗法产生抗药性,因此治疗方案寥寥无几。强迫症的基础是大脑皮层、纹状体和丘脑网络中异常的神经环路。考虑到强迫症症状的神经回路障碍,神经刺激疗法提供了一个以个性化方式调节精神病理学的机会。此外,通过探究病理神经网络,还能加深对疾病状态的理解:本视角讨论了 TMS 和 DBS 疗法的临床疗效、治疗途径选择以及患者管理方面的注意事项和挑战。讨论了最新的科学进展,重点关注神经回路和生物心理社会方面。此外,还对未来研究提出了转化建议和意见:有强有力的证据支持 TMS 和 DBS 作为治疗耐药强迫症患者的有效疗法,并辅以出色的安全性和有利的卫生经济数据。尽管慢性严重强迫症患者非常需要替代疗法,但监管机构和精神病学界对神经刺激疗法的抵制依然存在。作者认为,应在拥有适当临床资源的专科医院为有治疗耐药性的强迫症患者提供更多的 TMS 和 DBS 治疗机会,特别是考虑到辅助治疗和后续护理。此外,连接组靶向治疗已显示出对症状改善的强大预测能力,在推进个性化治疗方面具有潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The promise and challenges of transcranial magnetic stimulation and deep brain stimulation as therapeutic options for obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Introduction: Obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) represents a complex and often difficult to treat disorder. Pharmacological and psychotherapeutic interventions are often associated with sub-optimal outcomes, and 40-60% of patients are resistant to first line therapies and thus left with few treatment options. OCD is underpinned by aberrant neurocircuitry within cortical, striatal, and thalamic brain networks. Considering the neurocircuitry impairments that underlie OCD symptomology, neurostimulation therapies provide an opportunity to modulate psychopathology in a personalized manner. Also, by probing pathological neural networks, enhanced understanding of disease states can be obtained.

Areas covered: This perspective discusses the clinical efficacy of TMS and DBS therapies, treatment access options, and considerations and challenges in managing patients. Recent scientific progress is discussed, with a focus on neurocircuitry and biopsychosocial aspects. Translational recommendations and suggestions for future research are provided.

Expert opinion: There is robust evidence to support TMS and DBS as an efficacious therapy for treatment resistant OCD patients supported by an excellent safety profile and favorable health economic data. Despite a great need for alternative therapies for chronic and severe OCD patients, resistance toward neurostimulation therapies from regulatory bodies and the psychiatric community remains. The authors contend for greater access to TMS and DBS for treatment resistant OCD patients at specialized sites with appropriate clinical resources, particularly considering adjunct and follow-up care. Also, connectome targeting has shown robust predictive ability of symptom improvements and holds potential in advancing personalized neurostimulation therapies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.30%
发文量
61
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics (ISSN 1473-7175) provides expert reviews on the use of drugs and medicines in clinical neurology and neuropsychiatry. Coverage includes disease management, new medicines and drugs in neurology, therapeutic indications, diagnostics, medical treatment guidelines and neurological diseases such as stroke, epilepsy, Alzheimer''s and Parkinson''s. Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信