假释委员会利用对抗性风险分析进行决策

IF 1.8 4区数学 Q1 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY

American Statistician Pub Date : 2024-01-22 DOI:10.1080/00031305.2024.2303416

Chaitanya Joshi, Charné Nel, Javier Cano, Devon L.L. Polaschek

引用次数: 0

摘要

与贝叶斯博弈论相比，对抗性风险分析（ARA）可以对博弈论决策问题进行更真实的建模。虽然针对各种应用的 ARA 解决方案已被讨论过，但仍有许多问题有待解决。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Parole Board Decision-Making using Adversarial Risk Analysis

Adversarial Risk Analysis (ARA) allows for much more realistic modeling of game theoretic decision problems than Bayesian game theory. While ARA solutions for various applications have been discuss...

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

American Statistician 数学-统计学与概率论

CiteScore

3.50

自引率

5.60%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Are you looking for general-interest articles about current national and international statistical problems and programs; interesting and fun articles of a general nature about statistics and its applications; or the teaching of statistics? Then you are looking for The American Statistician (TAS), published quarterly by the American Statistical Association. TAS contains timely articles organized into the following sections: Statistical Practice, General, Teacher''s Corner, History Corner, Interdisciplinary, Statistical Computing and Graphics, Reviews of Books and Teaching Materials, and Letters to the Editor.