修改钆醋酸增强型磁共振成像 "冲刷 "定义时肝脏成像报告和数据系统对肝细胞癌的诊断性能

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Weijuan Hu, Rong Lyu, Di Wang, Zhongsong Gao, Cheng Sun, Kefeng Jia
{"title":"修改钆醋酸增强型磁共振成像 \"冲刷 \"定义时肝脏成像报告和数据系统对肝细胞癌的诊断性能","authors":"Weijuan Hu,&nbsp;Rong Lyu,&nbsp;Di Wang,&nbsp;Zhongsong Gao,&nbsp;Cheng Sun,&nbsp;Kefeng Jia","doi":"10.1016/j.ajg.2023.12.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and study aims</h3><p>The sensitivity of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI) was suboptimal. This study evaluated the LI-RADS diagnostic performance in HCC when modifying the definition of washout using the transition phase (TP) or hepatobiliary phase (HBP) hypointensity on EOB-MRI.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>This retrospective study included patients at high risk of HCC who underwent EOB-MRI from June 2016 to June 2021. Three modified LI-RADS (mLI-RADS) algorithms were formulated according to different definitions of washout as follows: (a) portal venous phase (PVP) or TP hypointensity, (b) PVP or HBP hypointensity, and (c) PVP or TP or HBP hypointensity. Diagnostic performance, including sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, was compared between mLI-RADS and LI-RADS v2018 using <em>McNemar’s</em> test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 379 patients with 426 pathologically confirmed hepatic observations (250 HCCs, 88 nonHCC malignancies, and 88 benign lesions) were included in our study. The sensitivity rates of mLI-RADS a–c (80.0 %, 80.8 %, and 80.8 %) were all higher than that of LI-RADS v2018 (74.4 %) (all <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). The specificity rates of mLI-RADS a–c (86.9 %, 85.8 %, and 85.8 %) were all slightly lower than that of LI-RADS v2018 (88.6 %), although no statistically significant difference was noted (all <em>p</em> &gt; 0.05). The accuracies of the three mLI-RADS algorithms were the same and were all higher than that of LI-RADS v2018 (82.9 % vs. 80.3 %, all <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>When the definition of washout appearance was extended to TP or HBP hypointensity on EOB-MRI, the diagnostic sensitivity of LI-RADS for HCC improved without decreasing specificity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48674,"journal":{"name":"Arab Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"25 1","pages":"Pages 58-63"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687197923001223/pdfft?md5=2f57d15ab48c79313ae708e4561f1ab6&pid=1-s2.0-S1687197923001223-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liver imaging reporting and data system diagnostic performance in hepatocellular carcinoma when modifying the definition of “washout” on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging\",\"authors\":\"Weijuan Hu,&nbsp;Rong Lyu,&nbsp;Di Wang,&nbsp;Zhongsong Gao,&nbsp;Cheng Sun,&nbsp;Kefeng Jia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajg.2023.12.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and study aims</h3><p>The sensitivity of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI) was suboptimal. This study evaluated the LI-RADS diagnostic performance in HCC when modifying the definition of washout using the transition phase (TP) or hepatobiliary phase (HBP) hypointensity on EOB-MRI.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>This retrospective study included patients at high risk of HCC who underwent EOB-MRI from June 2016 to June 2021. Three modified LI-RADS (mLI-RADS) algorithms were formulated according to different definitions of washout as follows: (a) portal venous phase (PVP) or TP hypointensity, (b) PVP or HBP hypointensity, and (c) PVP or TP or HBP hypointensity. Diagnostic performance, including sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, was compared between mLI-RADS and LI-RADS v2018 using <em>McNemar’s</em> test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 379 patients with 426 pathologically confirmed hepatic observations (250 HCCs, 88 nonHCC malignancies, and 88 benign lesions) were included in our study. The sensitivity rates of mLI-RADS a–c (80.0 %, 80.8 %, and 80.8 %) were all higher than that of LI-RADS v2018 (74.4 %) (all <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). The specificity rates of mLI-RADS a–c (86.9 %, 85.8 %, and 85.8 %) were all slightly lower than that of LI-RADS v2018 (88.6 %), although no statistically significant difference was noted (all <em>p</em> &gt; 0.05). The accuracies of the three mLI-RADS algorithms were the same and were all higher than that of LI-RADS v2018 (82.9 % vs. 80.3 %, all <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>When the definition of washout appearance was extended to TP or HBP hypointensity on EOB-MRI, the diagnostic sensitivity of LI-RADS for HCC improved without decreasing specificity.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arab Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 58-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687197923001223/pdfft?md5=2f57d15ab48c79313ae708e4561f1ab6&pid=1-s2.0-S1687197923001223-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arab Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687197923001223\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arab Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687197923001223","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和研究目的肝脏成像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)在钆醋酸增强磁共振成像(EOB-MRI)上诊断肝细胞癌(HCC)的灵敏度并不理想。本研究评估了当使用 EOB-MRI 上的过渡相(TP)或肝胆相(HBP)低密度来修改冲洗定义时,LI-RADS 在 HCC 中的诊断性能。根据不同的冲洗定义,制定了以下三种改良 LI-RADS 算法(mLI-RADS):(a) 门静脉相(PVP)或 TP 低密度,(b) PVP 或 HBP 低密度,以及 (c) PVP 或 TP 或 HBP 低密度。使用 McNemar 检验比较了 mLI-RADS 和 LI-RADS v2018 的诊断性能,包括灵敏度、特异性和准确性。结果 我们的研究共纳入了 379 例患者,426 例病理确诊的肝脏观察结果(250 例 HCC、88 例非 HCC 恶性肿瘤和 88 例良性病变)。mLI-RADS a-c 的灵敏度(80.0%、80.8% 和 80.8%)均高于 LI-RADS v2018 的灵敏度(74.4%)(所有 p 均为 0.05)。mLI-RADS a-c 的特异性率(86.9 %、85.8 % 和 85.8 %)均略低于 LI-RADS v2018 的特异性率(88.6 %),但差异无统计学意义(所有 p 均为 0.05)。三种 mLI-RADS 算法的准确率相同,均高于 LI-RADS v2018(82.9 % vs. 80.3 %,所有 p < 0.05)。结论当冲洗外观的定义扩展到 EOB-MRI 上的 TP 或 HBP 低密度时,LI-RADS 对 HCC 的诊断灵敏度有所提高,但特异性并未降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Liver imaging reporting and data system diagnostic performance in hepatocellular carcinoma when modifying the definition of “washout” on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

Background and study aims

The sensitivity of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI) was suboptimal. This study evaluated the LI-RADS diagnostic performance in HCC when modifying the definition of washout using the transition phase (TP) or hepatobiliary phase (HBP) hypointensity on EOB-MRI.

Patients and methods

This retrospective study included patients at high risk of HCC who underwent EOB-MRI from June 2016 to June 2021. Three modified LI-RADS (mLI-RADS) algorithms were formulated according to different definitions of washout as follows: (a) portal venous phase (PVP) or TP hypointensity, (b) PVP or HBP hypointensity, and (c) PVP or TP or HBP hypointensity. Diagnostic performance, including sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, was compared between mLI-RADS and LI-RADS v2018 using McNemar’s test.

Results

A total of 379 patients with 426 pathologically confirmed hepatic observations (250 HCCs, 88 nonHCC malignancies, and 88 benign lesions) were included in our study. The sensitivity rates of mLI-RADS a–c (80.0 %, 80.8 %, and 80.8 %) were all higher than that of LI-RADS v2018 (74.4 %) (all p < 0.05). The specificity rates of mLI-RADS a–c (86.9 %, 85.8 %, and 85.8 %) were all slightly lower than that of LI-RADS v2018 (88.6 %), although no statistically significant difference was noted (all p > 0.05). The accuracies of the three mLI-RADS algorithms were the same and were all higher than that of LI-RADS v2018 (82.9 % vs. 80.3 %, all p < 0.05).

Conclusion

When the definition of washout appearance was extended to TP or HBP hypointensity on EOB-MRI, the diagnostic sensitivity of LI-RADS for HCC improved without decreasing specificity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arab Journal of Gastroenterology
Arab Journal of Gastroenterology Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Arab Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) publishes different studies related to the digestive system. It aims to be the foremost scientific peer reviewed journal encompassing diverse studies related to the digestive system and its disorders, and serving the Pan-Arab and wider community working on gastrointestinal disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信