用于双侧颈前庭诱发肌源性电位 (cVEMP) 测试的电极蒙太奇。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Journal of the American Academy of Audiology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1055/a-2250-3096
Jessie N Patterson, Nour El Hidek, Kristen L Janky
{"title":"用于双侧颈前庭诱发肌源性电位 (cVEMP) 测试的电极蒙太奇。","authors":"Jessie N Patterson, Nour El Hidek, Kristen L Janky","doi":"10.1055/a-2250-3096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs) are predominantly ipsilateral, myogenic responses originating from saccular activation. Some individuals have contralateral-crossed cVEMP responses with monaural air-conducted stimulation (ACS) which can contaminate cVEMP responses with bilateral stimulation. While the origin of the contralateral-crossed response is under debate, its presence has implications for cVEMP testing with midline bone conduction vibration (BCV).</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong> The purpose of this study was to determine the origin of the contralateral-crossed cVEMP response. It was hypothesized that the crossed response is due to electrode contamination and would disappear with a modified electrode montage.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong> This is a cross-sectional research study.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong> Fifteen healthy participants (30 ears; mean age: 27.4 19-39; 10 females).</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong> Participants completed cVEMP testing using three stimulation methods (monoaural ACS, binaural ACS, and midline BCV) and two electrode montages (sternum reference and Fp reference).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> In the monoaural ACS with sternum reference condition, 53.3% ears had contralateral-crossed cVEMP responses that were in-phase with the ipsilateral response for all but three ears. Whereas in the monoaural ACS with Fp reference condition, 3% had a contralateral-crossed cVEMP response. ACS and BCV cVEMP corrected amplitudes were significantly larger in the sternum reference conditions, which is attributed to artificial enhancement from the in-phase contralateral-crossed responses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong> The significant reduction of contralateral-crossed responses in the Fp reference condition suggests that the contralateral-crossed cVEMP response is due to reference electrode contamination and may be a more appropriate reference placement when completing cVEMPs with midline BCV.</p>","PeriodicalId":50021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"165-171"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11534300/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electrode Montage for Bilateral Cervical Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potential Testing.\",\"authors\":\"Jessie N Patterson, Nour El Hidek, Kristen L Janky\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2250-3096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs) are predominantly ipsilateral, myogenic responses originating from saccular activation. Some individuals have contralateral-crossed cVEMP responses with monaural air-conducted stimulation (ACS) which can contaminate cVEMP responses with bilateral stimulation. While the origin of the contralateral-crossed response is under debate, its presence has implications for cVEMP testing with midline bone conduction vibration (BCV).</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong> The purpose of this study was to determine the origin of the contralateral-crossed cVEMP response. It was hypothesized that the crossed response is due to electrode contamination and would disappear with a modified electrode montage.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong> This is a cross-sectional research study.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong> Fifteen healthy participants (30 ears; mean age: 27.4 19-39; 10 females).</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong> Participants completed cVEMP testing using three stimulation methods (monoaural ACS, binaural ACS, and midline BCV) and two electrode montages (sternum reference and Fp reference).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> In the monoaural ACS with sternum reference condition, 53.3% ears had contralateral-crossed cVEMP responses that were in-phase with the ipsilateral response for all but three ears. Whereas in the monoaural ACS with Fp reference condition, 3% had a contralateral-crossed cVEMP response. ACS and BCV cVEMP corrected amplitudes were significantly larger in the sternum reference conditions, which is attributed to artificial enhancement from the in-phase contralateral-crossed responses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong> The significant reduction of contralateral-crossed responses in the Fp reference condition suggests that the contralateral-crossed cVEMP response is due to reference electrode contamination and may be a more appropriate reference placement when completing cVEMPs with midline BCV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"165-171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11534300/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2250-3096\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2250-3096","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:颈前庭诱发肌源性电位(cVEMPs)主要是同侧的肌源性反应,源于骶肌激活。有些人在单耳气导刺激(ACS)下会出现对侧交叉的 cVEMP 反应,这会污染双侧刺激下的 cVEMP 反应。虽然对侧交叉反应的起源还存在争议,但它的存在对使用中线骨传导振动(BCV)进行 cVEMP 测试有影响。假设交叉反应是由电极污染引起的,并将在修改电极蒙太奇后消失:横断面研究:15 名健康参与者(30 耳;平均年龄:27.4 19-39 岁;10 名女性):参与者使用三种刺激方法(单耳 ACS、双耳 ACS 和中线 BCV)和两种电极蒙太奇(胸骨参考和 Fp 参考)完成 cVEMP 测试:在以胸骨为参照的单耳 ACS 条件下,53.3% 的耳朵出现了对侧交叉的 cVEMP 反应,除 3 只耳朵外,其他耳朵的 cVEMP 反应均与同侧反应同相。而在以 Fp 为参考的单耳 ACS 条件下,3% 的耳朵出现对侧交叉的 cVEMP 反应。在胸骨参考条件下,ACS 和 BCV cVEMP 校正振幅明显增大,这是由于同相对侧交叉反应的人为增强所致:在 Fp 参考条件下,对侧交叉反应明显减少,这表明对侧交叉 cVEMP 反应是由参考电极污染引起的,在完成中线 BCV cVEMP 时,对侧交叉可能是更合适的参考位置。假设交叉反应是由电极污染引起的,并将在修改电极蒙太奇后消失:横断面研究:15 名健康参与者(30 耳;平均年龄:27.4 19-39 岁;10 名女性):参与者使用三种刺激方法(单耳 ACS、双耳 ACS 和中线 BCV)和三种电极蒙太奇(胸骨参考、Fp 参考和 Fp 上的活动)完成 cVEMP 测试:在有胸骨参考的单耳 ACS 条件下,53.3% 的耳朵有对侧交叉的 cVEMP 反应,除 3 只耳朵外,其他所有耳朵的 cVEMP 反应都与同侧反应同相。而在以 Fp 为参考的单耳 ACS 条件下,3% 的耳朵出现了对侧交叉的 cVEMP 反应。没有参与者显示出使用 Fp 作为活动电极的反应,这表明这是一个中性部位。在胸骨参考条件下,ACS 和 BCV cVEMP 校正振幅显著增大,这归因于同相对侧交叉反应的人为增强:结论:在 Fp 参比条件下,对侧交叉反应明显减少,这表明对侧交叉 cVEMP 反应是由参比电极污染引起的,在使用中线 BCV 完成 cVEMP 时,这可能是一个更合适的参比位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Electrode Montage for Bilateral Cervical Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potential Testing.

Background:  Cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs) are predominantly ipsilateral, myogenic responses originating from saccular activation. Some individuals have contralateral-crossed cVEMP responses with monaural air-conducted stimulation (ACS) which can contaminate cVEMP responses with bilateral stimulation. While the origin of the contralateral-crossed response is under debate, its presence has implications for cVEMP testing with midline bone conduction vibration (BCV).

Purpose:  The purpose of this study was to determine the origin of the contralateral-crossed cVEMP response. It was hypothesized that the crossed response is due to electrode contamination and would disappear with a modified electrode montage.

Research design:  This is a cross-sectional research study.

Study sample:  Fifteen healthy participants (30 ears; mean age: 27.4 19-39; 10 females).

Data collection and analysis:  Participants completed cVEMP testing using three stimulation methods (monoaural ACS, binaural ACS, and midline BCV) and two electrode montages (sternum reference and Fp reference).

Results:  In the monoaural ACS with sternum reference condition, 53.3% ears had contralateral-crossed cVEMP responses that were in-phase with the ipsilateral response for all but three ears. Whereas in the monoaural ACS with Fp reference condition, 3% had a contralateral-crossed cVEMP response. ACS and BCV cVEMP corrected amplitudes were significantly larger in the sternum reference conditions, which is attributed to artificial enhancement from the in-phase contralateral-crossed responses.

Conclusions:  The significant reduction of contralateral-crossed responses in the Fp reference condition suggests that the contralateral-crossed cVEMP response is due to reference electrode contamination and may be a more appropriate reference placement when completing cVEMPs with midline BCV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA) is the Academy''s scholarly peer-reviewed publication, issued 10 times per year and available to Academy members as a benefit of membership. The JAAA publishes articles and clinical reports in all areas of audiology, including audiological assessment, amplification, aural habilitation and rehabilitation, auditory electrophysiology, vestibular assessment, and hearing science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信