{"title":"大脚怪如果它在那里,会是熊吗?","authors":"Floe Foxon","doi":"10.1111/jzo.13148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>It has been suggested that the American black bear (<i>Ursus americanus</i>) may be responsible for a significant number of purported sightings of an alleged unknown species of hominid in North America. Previous analyses have identified a correlation between ‘sasquatch’ or ‘bigfoot’ sightings and black bear populations in the Pacific Northwest using ecological niche models and simple models of expected animal sightings. The present study expands the analysis to the entire US and Canada by modelling sasquatch sightings and bear populations in each state/province while adjusting for human population and forest area in a generalized linear model. Sasquatch sightings were statistically significantly associated with bear populations such that, on the average, every <span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <mn>1000</mn>\n </mrow></math> bear increase in the bear population is associated with a <span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <mn>4</mn>\n <mo>%</mo>\n </mrow></math> (<span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <mn>95</mn>\n <mo>%</mo>\n </mrow></math> CI: <span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow></math>–<span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <mn>7</mn>\n <mo>%</mo>\n </mrow></math>) increase in sasquatch sightings. Thus, as black bear populations increase, sasquatch sightings are expected to increase. On average, across all states and provinces in 2006, after controlling for human population and forest area, there were approximately <span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <mn>5000</mn>\n </mrow></math> bears per sasquatch sighting. Based on statistical considerations, it is likely that many supposed sasquatch are really misidentified known forms. If bigfoot is there, it could be a bear.</p>","PeriodicalId":17600,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Zoology","volume":"323 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bigfoot: If it's there, could it be a bear?\",\"authors\":\"Floe Foxon\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jzo.13148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>It has been suggested that the American black bear (<i>Ursus americanus</i>) may be responsible for a significant number of purported sightings of an alleged unknown species of hominid in North America. Previous analyses have identified a correlation between ‘sasquatch’ or ‘bigfoot’ sightings and black bear populations in the Pacific Northwest using ecological niche models and simple models of expected animal sightings. The present study expands the analysis to the entire US and Canada by modelling sasquatch sightings and bear populations in each state/province while adjusting for human population and forest area in a generalized linear model. Sasquatch sightings were statistically significantly associated with bear populations such that, on the average, every <span></span><math>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>1000</mn>\\n </mrow></math> bear increase in the bear population is associated with a <span></span><math>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>4</mn>\\n <mo>%</mo>\\n </mrow></math> (<span></span><math>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>95</mn>\\n <mo>%</mo>\\n </mrow></math> CI: <span></span><math>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>1</mn>\\n </mrow></math>–<span></span><math>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>7</mn>\\n <mo>%</mo>\\n </mrow></math>) increase in sasquatch sightings. Thus, as black bear populations increase, sasquatch sightings are expected to increase. On average, across all states and provinces in 2006, after controlling for human population and forest area, there were approximately <span></span><math>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>5000</mn>\\n </mrow></math> bears per sasquatch sighting. Based on statistical considerations, it is likely that many supposed sasquatch are really misidentified known forms. If bigfoot is there, it could be a bear.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Zoology\",\"volume\":\"323 1\",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Zoology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jzo.13148\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Zoology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jzo.13148","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
It has been suggested that the American black bear (Ursus americanus) may be responsible for a significant number of purported sightings of an alleged unknown species of hominid in North America. Previous analyses have identified a correlation between ‘sasquatch’ or ‘bigfoot’ sightings and black bear populations in the Pacific Northwest using ecological niche models and simple models of expected animal sightings. The present study expands the analysis to the entire US and Canada by modelling sasquatch sightings and bear populations in each state/province while adjusting for human population and forest area in a generalized linear model. Sasquatch sightings were statistically significantly associated with bear populations such that, on the average, every bear increase in the bear population is associated with a ( CI: –) increase in sasquatch sightings. Thus, as black bear populations increase, sasquatch sightings are expected to increase. On average, across all states and provinces in 2006, after controlling for human population and forest area, there were approximately bears per sasquatch sighting. Based on statistical considerations, it is likely that many supposed sasquatch are really misidentified known forms. If bigfoot is there, it could be a bear.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Zoology publishes high-quality research papers that are original and are of broad interest. The Editors seek studies that are hypothesis-driven and interdisciplinary in nature. Papers on animal behaviour, ecology, physiology, anatomy, developmental biology, evolution, systematics, genetics and genomics will be considered; research that explores the interface between these disciplines is strongly encouraged. Studies dealing with geographically and/or taxonomically restricted topics should test general hypotheses, describe novel findings or have broad implications.
The Journal of Zoology aims to maintain an effective but fair peer-review process that recognises research quality as a combination of the relevance, approach and execution of a research study.