大脚怪如果它在那里,会是熊吗?

IF 1.9 3区 生物学 Q1 ZOOLOGY
Floe Foxon
{"title":"大脚怪如果它在那里,会是熊吗?","authors":"Floe Foxon","doi":"10.1111/jzo.13148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>It has been suggested that the American black bear (<i>Ursus americanus</i>) may be responsible for a significant number of purported sightings of an alleged unknown species of hominid in North America. Previous analyses have identified a correlation between ‘sasquatch’ or ‘bigfoot’ sightings and black bear populations in the Pacific Northwest using ecological niche models and simple models of expected animal sightings. The present study expands the analysis to the entire US and Canada by modelling sasquatch sightings and bear populations in each state/province while adjusting for human population and forest area in a generalized linear model. Sasquatch sightings were statistically significantly associated with bear populations such that, on the average, every <span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <mn>1000</mn>\n </mrow></math> bear increase in the bear population is associated with a <span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <mn>4</mn>\n <mo>%</mo>\n </mrow></math> (<span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <mn>95</mn>\n <mo>%</mo>\n </mrow></math> CI: <span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow></math>–<span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <mn>7</mn>\n <mo>%</mo>\n </mrow></math>) increase in sasquatch sightings. Thus, as black bear populations increase, sasquatch sightings are expected to increase. On average, across all states and provinces in 2006, after controlling for human population and forest area, there were approximately <span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <mn>5000</mn>\n </mrow></math> bears per sasquatch sighting. Based on statistical considerations, it is likely that many supposed sasquatch are really misidentified known forms. If bigfoot is there, it could be a bear.</p>","PeriodicalId":17600,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Zoology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bigfoot: If it's there, could it be a bear?\",\"authors\":\"Floe Foxon\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jzo.13148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>It has been suggested that the American black bear (<i>Ursus americanus</i>) may be responsible for a significant number of purported sightings of an alleged unknown species of hominid in North America. Previous analyses have identified a correlation between ‘sasquatch’ or ‘bigfoot’ sightings and black bear populations in the Pacific Northwest using ecological niche models and simple models of expected animal sightings. The present study expands the analysis to the entire US and Canada by modelling sasquatch sightings and bear populations in each state/province while adjusting for human population and forest area in a generalized linear model. Sasquatch sightings were statistically significantly associated with bear populations such that, on the average, every <span></span><math>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>1000</mn>\\n </mrow></math> bear increase in the bear population is associated with a <span></span><math>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>4</mn>\\n <mo>%</mo>\\n </mrow></math> (<span></span><math>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>95</mn>\\n <mo>%</mo>\\n </mrow></math> CI: <span></span><math>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>1</mn>\\n </mrow></math>–<span></span><math>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>7</mn>\\n <mo>%</mo>\\n </mrow></math>) increase in sasquatch sightings. Thus, as black bear populations increase, sasquatch sightings are expected to increase. On average, across all states and provinces in 2006, after controlling for human population and forest area, there were approximately <span></span><math>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>5000</mn>\\n </mrow></math> bears per sasquatch sighting. Based on statistical considerations, it is likely that many supposed sasquatch are really misidentified known forms. If bigfoot is there, it could be a bear.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Zoology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Zoology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jzo.13148\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Zoology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jzo.13148","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有人认为,美洲黑熊(Ursus americanus)可能是大量据称在北美洲目击到的未知类人猿的原因。之前的分析利用生态位模型和预期动物目击的简单模型,确定了西北太平洋地区 "大脚怪 "或 "大脚 "目击与黑熊数量之间的相关性。本研究将分析范围扩大到整个美国和加拿大,在广义线性模型中对各州/省的大脚野人目击事件和黑熊数量进行建模,同时对人口和森林面积进行调整。据统计,大脚野人目击事件与黑熊数量有显著相关性,平均而言,黑熊数量每增加1000头,大脚野人目击事件就会增加4%$ 4\%$ (95%$ 95%\$ CI: 1$ 1$-7%$ 7%\$)。因此,随着黑熊数量的增加,预计大脚野人的目击次数也会增加。平均而言,2006年在所有的州和省,在控制了人类数量和森林面积之后,每只大脚野人目击到的黑熊大约有5000只。基于统计考虑,许多所谓的大脚野人很可能真的是被误认的已知形态。如果大脚怪在那里,它也可能是一只熊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Bigfoot: If it's there, could it be a bear?

Bigfoot: If it's there, could it be a bear?

It has been suggested that the American black bear (Ursus americanus) may be responsible for a significant number of purported sightings of an alleged unknown species of hominid in North America. Previous analyses have identified a correlation between ‘sasquatch’ or ‘bigfoot’ sightings and black bear populations in the Pacific Northwest using ecological niche models and simple models of expected animal sightings. The present study expands the analysis to the entire US and Canada by modelling sasquatch sightings and bear populations in each state/province while adjusting for human population and forest area in a generalized linear model. Sasquatch sightings were statistically significantly associated with bear populations such that, on the average, every 1000 bear increase in the bear population is associated with a 4 % ( 95 % CI: 1 7 % ) increase in sasquatch sightings. Thus, as black bear populations increase, sasquatch sightings are expected to increase. On average, across all states and provinces in 2006, after controlling for human population and forest area, there were approximately 5000 bears per sasquatch sighting. Based on statistical considerations, it is likely that many supposed sasquatch are really misidentified known forms. If bigfoot is there, it could be a bear.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Zoology
Journal of Zoology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Zoology publishes high-quality research papers that are original and are of broad interest. The Editors seek studies that are hypothesis-driven and interdisciplinary in nature. Papers on animal behaviour, ecology, physiology, anatomy, developmental biology, evolution, systematics, genetics and genomics will be considered; research that explores the interface between these disciplines is strongly encouraged. Studies dealing with geographically and/or taxonomically restricted topics should test general hypotheses, describe novel findings or have broad implications. The Journal of Zoology aims to maintain an effective but fair peer-review process that recognises research quality as a combination of the relevance, approach and execution of a research study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信