双面平台与单面拥堵的混合作用

IF 1.2 Q3 ECONOMICS
Sangita Poddar , Tanmoyee Banerjee (Chatterjee)
{"title":"双面平台与单面拥堵的混合作用","authors":"Sangita Poddar ,&nbsp;Tanmoyee Banerjee (Chatterjee)","doi":"10.1016/j.rie.2024.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The study investigates the hybrid role of a monopoly platform that serves as an intermediary to its two distinct sides, while also offering its own house brand products to its consumers. We attempt to understand the condition that leads a platform to prefer its own brand products over those of its rival sellers in presence of cross one-way congestion and cross-side network effects. Our model suggests that higher the price for a platform's product becomes, the more likely the monopoly platform prefers its own products over its sellers’ by transmitting higher levels of advertising signals and channeling more customers toward its own-label. We then compare the model variables under both the hybrid and pure-intermediary regimes and conclude that hybrid model may not necessarily generate anti-competitive outcomes in presence of cross-side effects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46094,"journal":{"name":"Research in Economics","volume":"78 1","pages":"Pages 83-98"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hybrid role of two-sided platform with one-sided congestion\",\"authors\":\"Sangita Poddar ,&nbsp;Tanmoyee Banerjee (Chatterjee)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rie.2024.01.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The study investigates the hybrid role of a monopoly platform that serves as an intermediary to its two distinct sides, while also offering its own house brand products to its consumers. We attempt to understand the condition that leads a platform to prefer its own brand products over those of its rival sellers in presence of cross one-way congestion and cross-side network effects. Our model suggests that higher the price for a platform's product becomes, the more likely the monopoly platform prefers its own products over its sellers’ by transmitting higher levels of advertising signals and channeling more customers toward its own-label. We then compare the model variables under both the hybrid and pure-intermediary regimes and conclude that hybrid model may not necessarily generate anti-competitive outcomes in presence of cross-side effects.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Economics\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 83-98\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090944324000048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090944324000048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了垄断平台的混合角色,该平台既充当双方的中介,又向消费者提供自己的品牌产品。我们试图了解,在存在交叉单向拥塞和交叉侧网络效应的情况下,是什么条件导致平台优先选择自己的品牌产品,而不是竞争对手卖家的产品。我们的模型表明,平台产品的价格越高,垄断平台就越有可能通过传递更高水平的广告信号和引导更多消费者购买其自有品牌的产品,从而使自己的产品优于其卖家的产品。然后,我们比较了混合模式和纯中介模式下的模型变量,得出结论:在存在交叉效应的情况下,混合模式不一定会产生反竞争结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hybrid role of two-sided platform with one-sided congestion

The study investigates the hybrid role of a monopoly platform that serves as an intermediary to its two distinct sides, while also offering its own house brand products to its consumers. We attempt to understand the condition that leads a platform to prefer its own brand products over those of its rival sellers in presence of cross one-way congestion and cross-side network effects. Our model suggests that higher the price for a platform's product becomes, the more likely the monopoly platform prefers its own products over its sellers’ by transmitting higher levels of advertising signals and channeling more customers toward its own-label. We then compare the model variables under both the hybrid and pure-intermediary regimes and conclude that hybrid model may not necessarily generate anti-competitive outcomes in presence of cross-side effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
89 days
期刊介绍: Established in 1947, Research in Economics is one of the oldest general-interest economics journals in the world and the main one among those based in Italy. The purpose of the journal is to select original theoretical and empirical articles that will have high impact on the debate in the social sciences; since 1947, it has published important research contributions on a wide range of topics. A summary of our editorial policy is this: the editors make a preliminary assessment of whether the results of a paper, if correct, are worth publishing. If so one of the associate editors reviews the paper: from the reviewer we expect to learn if the paper is understandable and coherent and - within reasonable bounds - the results are correct. We believe that long lags in publication and multiple demands for revision simply slow scientific progress. Our goal is to provide you a definitive answer within one month of submission. We give the editors one week to judge the overall contribution and if acceptable send your paper to an associate editor. We expect the associate editor to provide a more detailed evaluation within three weeks so that the editors can make a final decision before the month expires. In the (rare) case of a revision we allow four months and in the case of conditional acceptance we allow two months to submit the final version. In both cases we expect a cover letter explaining how you met the requirements. For conditional acceptance the editors will verify that the requirements were met. In the case of revision the original associate editor will do so. If the revision cannot be at least conditionally accepted it is rejected: there is no second revision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信