{"title":"双面平台与单面拥堵的混合作用","authors":"Sangita Poddar , Tanmoyee Banerjee (Chatterjee)","doi":"10.1016/j.rie.2024.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The study investigates the hybrid role of a monopoly platform that serves as an intermediary to its two distinct sides, while also offering its own house brand products to its consumers. We attempt to understand the condition that leads a platform to prefer its own brand products over those of its rival sellers in presence of cross one-way congestion and cross-side network effects. Our model suggests that higher the price for a platform's product becomes, the more likely the monopoly platform prefers its own products over its sellers’ by transmitting higher levels of advertising signals and channeling more customers toward its own-label. We then compare the model variables under both the hybrid and pure-intermediary regimes and conclude that hybrid model may not necessarily generate anti-competitive outcomes in presence of cross-side effects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46094,"journal":{"name":"Research in Economics","volume":"78 1","pages":"Pages 83-98"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hybrid role of two-sided platform with one-sided congestion\",\"authors\":\"Sangita Poddar , Tanmoyee Banerjee (Chatterjee)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rie.2024.01.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The study investigates the hybrid role of a monopoly platform that serves as an intermediary to its two distinct sides, while also offering its own house brand products to its consumers. We attempt to understand the condition that leads a platform to prefer its own brand products over those of its rival sellers in presence of cross one-way congestion and cross-side network effects. Our model suggests that higher the price for a platform's product becomes, the more likely the monopoly platform prefers its own products over its sellers’ by transmitting higher levels of advertising signals and channeling more customers toward its own-label. We then compare the model variables under both the hybrid and pure-intermediary regimes and conclude that hybrid model may not necessarily generate anti-competitive outcomes in presence of cross-side effects.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Economics\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 83-98\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090944324000048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090944324000048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hybrid role of two-sided platform with one-sided congestion
The study investigates the hybrid role of a monopoly platform that serves as an intermediary to its two distinct sides, while also offering its own house brand products to its consumers. We attempt to understand the condition that leads a platform to prefer its own brand products over those of its rival sellers in presence of cross one-way congestion and cross-side network effects. Our model suggests that higher the price for a platform's product becomes, the more likely the monopoly platform prefers its own products over its sellers’ by transmitting higher levels of advertising signals and channeling more customers toward its own-label. We then compare the model variables under both the hybrid and pure-intermediary regimes and conclude that hybrid model may not necessarily generate anti-competitive outcomes in presence of cross-side effects.
期刊介绍:
Established in 1947, Research in Economics is one of the oldest general-interest economics journals in the world and the main one among those based in Italy. The purpose of the journal is to select original theoretical and empirical articles that will have high impact on the debate in the social sciences; since 1947, it has published important research contributions on a wide range of topics. A summary of our editorial policy is this: the editors make a preliminary assessment of whether the results of a paper, if correct, are worth publishing. If so one of the associate editors reviews the paper: from the reviewer we expect to learn if the paper is understandable and coherent and - within reasonable bounds - the results are correct. We believe that long lags in publication and multiple demands for revision simply slow scientific progress. Our goal is to provide you a definitive answer within one month of submission. We give the editors one week to judge the overall contribution and if acceptable send your paper to an associate editor. We expect the associate editor to provide a more detailed evaluation within three weeks so that the editors can make a final decision before the month expires. In the (rare) case of a revision we allow four months and in the case of conditional acceptance we allow two months to submit the final version. In both cases we expect a cover letter explaining how you met the requirements. For conditional acceptance the editors will verify that the requirements were met. In the case of revision the original associate editor will do so. If the revision cannot be at least conditionally accepted it is rejected: there is no second revision.