共价有机框架 (COF) 的治疗传递潜力:来自理论计算的直觉

IF 1.9 4区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Mohsen D. Mohammadi, Hitler Louis, Innocent Benjamin, Daniel Oche, Hitendra M. Patel, Henry O. Edet
{"title":"共价有机框架 (COF) 的治疗传递潜力:来自理论计算的直觉","authors":"Mohsen D. Mohammadi,&nbsp;Hitler Louis,&nbsp;Innocent Benjamin,&nbsp;Daniel Oche,&nbsp;Hitendra M. Patel,&nbsp;Henry O. Edet","doi":"10.1002/slct.202303529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Regardless of the benefits, pharmaceutical companies are reticent to engage further in covalent organic framework-based drug development and drug delivery systems, preferring rather to explore preexisting chemical compound libraries for drug delivery. As such, this study aims to account for the efficacy of covalent organic frameworks (COFs) in the delivery of seven conventional drugs: Acetaminophen, Clodronic Acid, Hydroxyurea, Mercaptoporine, Thiotepa, Tioguanine, and Arsenic trioxide. Herein, Gaussian 16 software package is employed for the purpose of optimizing the systems at the DFT/ωB97XD/def2svp level of theory. Substantially, the nature of the inter- and intra- molecular interactions between the COF and each of the drugs utilized resulted in the re-adjustment of the molecular orbitals and yielded a distinct set of results for the most reactive and least stable and vice versa as deducible from the magnitudes of the highest occupied molecular orbital and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (HOMO-LUMO) gaps. Furthermore, the natural bond orbital (NBO) study indicates that the interacting molecules exhibit similar stability and reactivity, as evidenced by the proximity of their mean stabilization energies. Additionally, the topological analysis revealed that the most positive interaction occurred in Acetaminophen_COF, Clodronic acid_COF, Hydroxyurea_COF, and Tioguanine_COF. Also, the adsorption studies demonstrate that the above-mentioned drugs have weak interaction kinetics when they interact with the investigated COF. Strong adsorbing contacts were detected in the interactions of Arsenic trioxide, Hydroxyurea, and Tioguanine with the COF in the order Arsenic trioxide_COF &lt; Hydroxyurea_COF &lt; Tiog_COF, with corresponding values of −9.413 kcal/mol, −12.550 kcal/mol, and −17.570 kcal/mol, respectively. Overall, the study hypothesizes that when delivering the various drugs studied through the COF to biological systems, Acetaminophen, Hydroxyurea, Tioguanine, and Mercaptopurine have high reactivity with the COF and would be better adsorbed on it, as well as a longer recovery time of desorption due to their high adsorption on the COF surface.</p>","PeriodicalId":146,"journal":{"name":"ChemistrySelect","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic Delivery Potential of Covalent Organic Framework (COF): Intuition from Theoretical Calculations\",\"authors\":\"Mohsen D. Mohammadi,&nbsp;Hitler Louis,&nbsp;Innocent Benjamin,&nbsp;Daniel Oche,&nbsp;Hitendra M. Patel,&nbsp;Henry O. Edet\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/slct.202303529\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Regardless of the benefits, pharmaceutical companies are reticent to engage further in covalent organic framework-based drug development and drug delivery systems, preferring rather to explore preexisting chemical compound libraries for drug delivery. As such, this study aims to account for the efficacy of covalent organic frameworks (COFs) in the delivery of seven conventional drugs: Acetaminophen, Clodronic Acid, Hydroxyurea, Mercaptoporine, Thiotepa, Tioguanine, and Arsenic trioxide. Herein, Gaussian 16 software package is employed for the purpose of optimizing the systems at the DFT/ωB97XD/def2svp level of theory. Substantially, the nature of the inter- and intra- molecular interactions between the COF and each of the drugs utilized resulted in the re-adjustment of the molecular orbitals and yielded a distinct set of results for the most reactive and least stable and vice versa as deducible from the magnitudes of the highest occupied molecular orbital and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (HOMO-LUMO) gaps. Furthermore, the natural bond orbital (NBO) study indicates that the interacting molecules exhibit similar stability and reactivity, as evidenced by the proximity of their mean stabilization energies. Additionally, the topological analysis revealed that the most positive interaction occurred in Acetaminophen_COF, Clodronic acid_COF, Hydroxyurea_COF, and Tioguanine_COF. Also, the adsorption studies demonstrate that the above-mentioned drugs have weak interaction kinetics when they interact with the investigated COF. Strong adsorbing contacts were detected in the interactions of Arsenic trioxide, Hydroxyurea, and Tioguanine with the COF in the order Arsenic trioxide_COF &lt; Hydroxyurea_COF &lt; Tiog_COF, with corresponding values of −9.413 kcal/mol, −12.550 kcal/mol, and −17.570 kcal/mol, respectively. Overall, the study hypothesizes that when delivering the various drugs studied through the COF to biological systems, Acetaminophen, Hydroxyurea, Tioguanine, and Mercaptopurine have high reactivity with the COF and would be better adsorbed on it, as well as a longer recovery time of desorption due to their high adsorption on the COF surface.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ChemistrySelect\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ChemistrySelect\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/slct.202303529\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ChemistrySelect","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/slct.202303529","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不管有多少好处,制药公司都不愿进一步参与基于共价有机框架的药物开发和给药系统,而更愿意探索已有的化合物库来给药。因此,本研究旨在说明共价有机框架(COFs)在七种常规药物的给药过程中的功效:对乙酰氨基酚、氯膦酸、羟基脲、巯嘌呤、噻替帕、刁鸟嘌呤和三氧化二砷。本文采用高斯 16 软件包,在 DFT/ωB97XD/def2svp 理论水平上对系统进行优化。COF 与所使用的每种药物之间的分子间和分子内相互作用的性质导致了分子轨道的重新调整,并产生了一组反应性最强和最不稳定的不同结果,反之亦然,这可以从最高占用分子轨道和最低未占用分子轨道(HOMO-LUMO)间隙的大小中推导出来。此外,对自然键轨道(NBO)的研究表明,相互作用的分子表现出相似的稳定性和反应性,这一点从它们的平均稳定能的接近程度可以得到证明。此外,拓扑分析表明,对乙酰氨基酚_COF、氯膦酸_COF、羟基脲_COF 和刁胍_COF 的相互作用最为积极。此外,吸附研究还表明,上述药物与所研究的 COF 发生相互作用时,其相互作用动力学较弱。在三氧化二砷、羟基脲和刁胍与 COF 的相互作用中检测到了强吸附接触,顺序为三氧化二砷_COF < 羟基脲_COF < 刁胍_COF,相应值分别为 -9.413 kcal/mol、-12.550 kcal/mol 和 -17.570 kcal/mol。总之,研究假设,在通过 COF 向生物系统输送所研究的各种药物时,对乙酰氨基酚、羟基脲、刁鸟嘌呤和巯嘌呤与 COF 的反应活性较高,在 COF 上的吸附效果较好,而且由于它们在 COF 表面的吸附性较高,解吸恢复时间较长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Therapeutic Delivery Potential of Covalent Organic Framework (COF): Intuition from Theoretical Calculations

Therapeutic Delivery Potential of Covalent Organic Framework (COF): Intuition from Theoretical Calculations

Regardless of the benefits, pharmaceutical companies are reticent to engage further in covalent organic framework-based drug development and drug delivery systems, preferring rather to explore preexisting chemical compound libraries for drug delivery. As such, this study aims to account for the efficacy of covalent organic frameworks (COFs) in the delivery of seven conventional drugs: Acetaminophen, Clodronic Acid, Hydroxyurea, Mercaptoporine, Thiotepa, Tioguanine, and Arsenic trioxide. Herein, Gaussian 16 software package is employed for the purpose of optimizing the systems at the DFT/ωB97XD/def2svp level of theory. Substantially, the nature of the inter- and intra- molecular interactions between the COF and each of the drugs utilized resulted in the re-adjustment of the molecular orbitals and yielded a distinct set of results for the most reactive and least stable and vice versa as deducible from the magnitudes of the highest occupied molecular orbital and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (HOMO-LUMO) gaps. Furthermore, the natural bond orbital (NBO) study indicates that the interacting molecules exhibit similar stability and reactivity, as evidenced by the proximity of their mean stabilization energies. Additionally, the topological analysis revealed that the most positive interaction occurred in Acetaminophen_COF, Clodronic acid_COF, Hydroxyurea_COF, and Tioguanine_COF. Also, the adsorption studies demonstrate that the above-mentioned drugs have weak interaction kinetics when they interact with the investigated COF. Strong adsorbing contacts were detected in the interactions of Arsenic trioxide, Hydroxyurea, and Tioguanine with the COF in the order Arsenic trioxide_COF < Hydroxyurea_COF < Tiog_COF, with corresponding values of −9.413 kcal/mol, −12.550 kcal/mol, and −17.570 kcal/mol, respectively. Overall, the study hypothesizes that when delivering the various drugs studied through the COF to biological systems, Acetaminophen, Hydroxyurea, Tioguanine, and Mercaptopurine have high reactivity with the COF and would be better adsorbed on it, as well as a longer recovery time of desorption due to their high adsorption on the COF surface.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ChemistrySelect
ChemistrySelect Chemistry-General Chemistry
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1809
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: ChemistrySelect is the latest journal from ChemPubSoc Europe and Wiley-VCH. It offers researchers a quality society-owned journal in which to publish their work in all areas of chemistry. Manuscripts are evaluated by active researchers to ensure they add meaningfully to the scientific literature, and those accepted are processed quickly to ensure rapid online publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信