Cynthia Batista Santos , Beatriz da Cruz Santos , Aline Rocha Reis , Liliane Viana Pires
{"title":"APOEε4 基因型与补充 DHA 和 EPA 对认知能力下降结果的影响:随机临床试验的系统回顾","authors":"Cynthia Batista Santos , Beatriz da Cruz Santos , Aline Rocha Reis , Liliane Viana Pires","doi":"10.1016/j.hnm.2024.200249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) supplementation has been used to improve cognitive outcomes in diseases associated with cognition. However, the influence of APOEε4 genotype on these relationships remains unclear. Therefore, this systematic review aims to discuss the evidence regarding the effects of DHA and EPA supplementation on cognitive decline variables and relate them to APOEε4 genotype in middle-aged and older adults. The Medline (via PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, and Bireme/Lilacs databases were searched for studies, retrieving 1863 articles. After the step selection, two randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effects of EPA and DHA supplementation on cognitive variables were included. All the methodological steps were performed by two raters. The results of the RCTs were not congruent, as the non-carriers in the APOEε4 supplemented group performed worse in the quick-choice reaction time cognitive domain, whereas the carriers improved in the reasoning domain. The increase in DHA concentration in the supplemented group was lower in APOEε4 carriers than in individuals with other genotypes. Additionally, a smaller decline in right hippocampal brain volume correlated with higher EPA concentrations after supplementation in APOEε4 non-carriers. The dosage and supplementation time (18 months) were similar between studies. In conclusion, DHA and EPA supplementation showed no pragmatic effects on cognitive variables when considering the presence of the APOEε4 allele.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36125,"journal":{"name":"Human Nutrition and Metabolism","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 200249"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666149724000112/pdfft?md5=8e8e98fd6647546caadb94c2a049d313&pid=1-s2.0-S2666149724000112-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"APOEε4 genotype and DHA and EPA supplementation on the outcomes of cognitive decline: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials\",\"authors\":\"Cynthia Batista Santos , Beatriz da Cruz Santos , Aline Rocha Reis , Liliane Viana Pires\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hnm.2024.200249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) supplementation has been used to improve cognitive outcomes in diseases associated with cognition. However, the influence of APOEε4 genotype on these relationships remains unclear. Therefore, this systematic review aims to discuss the evidence regarding the effects of DHA and EPA supplementation on cognitive decline variables and relate them to APOEε4 genotype in middle-aged and older adults. The Medline (via PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, and Bireme/Lilacs databases were searched for studies, retrieving 1863 articles. After the step selection, two randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effects of EPA and DHA supplementation on cognitive variables were included. All the methodological steps were performed by two raters. The results of the RCTs were not congruent, as the non-carriers in the APOEε4 supplemented group performed worse in the quick-choice reaction time cognitive domain, whereas the carriers improved in the reasoning domain. The increase in DHA concentration in the supplemented group was lower in APOEε4 carriers than in individuals with other genotypes. Additionally, a smaller decline in right hippocampal brain volume correlated with higher EPA concentrations after supplementation in APOEε4 non-carriers. The dosage and supplementation time (18 months) were similar between studies. In conclusion, DHA and EPA supplementation showed no pragmatic effects on cognitive variables when considering the presence of the APOEε4 allele.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Nutrition and Metabolism\",\"volume\":\"35 \",\"pages\":\"Article 200249\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666149724000112/pdfft?md5=8e8e98fd6647546caadb94c2a049d313&pid=1-s2.0-S2666149724000112-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Nutrition and Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666149724000112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Nutrition and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666149724000112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
补充二十二碳六烯酸(DHA)和二十碳五烯酸(EPA)已被用于改善与认知相关疾病的认知结果。然而,APOEε4 基因型对这些关系的影响仍不清楚。因此,本系统综述旨在讨论有关补充 DHA 和 EPA 对中老年人认知能力下降变量的影响以及这些影响与 APOEε4 基因型之间关系的证据。研究人员在 Medline(通过 PubMed)、Scopus、Web of Science 和 Bireme/Lilacs 数据库中检索了 1863 篇研究文章。经过步骤选择后,纳入了两项评估补充 EPA 和 DHA 对认知变量影响的随机临床试验(RCT)。所有方法步骤均由两名评定员完成。RCT的结果并不一致,因为补充APOEε4的非携带者组在快速选择反应时间认知领域的表现较差,而携带者在推理领域的表现有所改善。与其他基因型的个体相比,APOEε4携带者补充组中DHA浓度的增加较低。此外,APOEε4非携带者补充EPA后,右侧海马体体积的下降幅度较小,而EPA浓度较高。不同研究的剂量和补充时间(18 个月)相似。总之,考虑到 APOEε4 等位基因的存在,补充 DHA 和 EPA 对认知变量没有实际影响。
APOEε4 genotype and DHA and EPA supplementation on the outcomes of cognitive decline: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials
Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) supplementation has been used to improve cognitive outcomes in diseases associated with cognition. However, the influence of APOEε4 genotype on these relationships remains unclear. Therefore, this systematic review aims to discuss the evidence regarding the effects of DHA and EPA supplementation on cognitive decline variables and relate them to APOEε4 genotype in middle-aged and older adults. The Medline (via PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, and Bireme/Lilacs databases were searched for studies, retrieving 1863 articles. After the step selection, two randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effects of EPA and DHA supplementation on cognitive variables were included. All the methodological steps were performed by two raters. The results of the RCTs were not congruent, as the non-carriers in the APOEε4 supplemented group performed worse in the quick-choice reaction time cognitive domain, whereas the carriers improved in the reasoning domain. The increase in DHA concentration in the supplemented group was lower in APOEε4 carriers than in individuals with other genotypes. Additionally, a smaller decline in right hippocampal brain volume correlated with higher EPA concentrations after supplementation in APOEε4 non-carriers. The dosage and supplementation time (18 months) were similar between studies. In conclusion, DHA and EPA supplementation showed no pragmatic effects on cognitive variables when considering the presence of the APOEε4 allele.