富血小板血浆治疗褥疮的有效性和安全性:随机对照试验的系统回顾与元分析》。

Zhonglin Hu, Haona Xv, Aiping Feng, Senmao Wang, Xuefeng Han
{"title":"富血小板血浆治疗褥疮的有效性和安全性:随机对照试验的系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Zhonglin Hu, Haona Xv, Aiping Feng, Senmao Wang, Xuefeng Han","doi":"10.1177/15347346241227001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pressure ulcers are common chronic wounds in clinical practice, severely affecting patients' quality of life and causing substantial economic burdens. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been explored for its potential in treating pressure ulcers. Herein, a study was carried out to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PRP in comparison to conventional treatments for pressure ulcers. A comprehensive search was conducted in databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, covering studies published from the inception to May 20, 2023, with only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of PRP on the healing of pressure ulcers included. The outcomes of interest included healing rates, ulcer area, ulcer volume, Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) score, healing time, and complications. Finally, 9 RCTs, involving 511 patients with 523 pressure ulcers, met the inclusion criteria. Our meta-analysis revealed a significant improvement in the healing rate, as evidenced by a weighted odds ratio (OR) of 3.40 (95% CI = 1.87 to 6.21, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 32%, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Additionally, the standard mean difference (SMD) for healed ulcer area favored the PRP group, reflecting an improvement of 1.38 cm<sup>2</sup> (<i>P</i> = 0.02). Furthermore, the reduction in PUSH scores within the PRP group outperformed that observed in the control group, demonstrating a SMD of 1.69 (<i>P</i> = 0.01). Nevertheless, complications and the SMD for ulcer volume reduction revealed no statistically significant differences between the groups. From these findings, PRP stands out as a promising and safe therapeutic approach for pressure ulcers. For a deeper understanding of PRP's role in pressure ulcer healing, it is crucial to conduct more well-structured, high-quality RCTs in upcoming studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Platelet-Rich Plasma for Pressure Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Zhonglin Hu, Haona Xv, Aiping Feng, Senmao Wang, Xuefeng Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15347346241227001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pressure ulcers are common chronic wounds in clinical practice, severely affecting patients' quality of life and causing substantial economic burdens. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been explored for its potential in treating pressure ulcers. Herein, a study was carried out to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PRP in comparison to conventional treatments for pressure ulcers. A comprehensive search was conducted in databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, covering studies published from the inception to May 20, 2023, with only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of PRP on the healing of pressure ulcers included. The outcomes of interest included healing rates, ulcer area, ulcer volume, Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) score, healing time, and complications. Finally, 9 RCTs, involving 511 patients with 523 pressure ulcers, met the inclusion criteria. Our meta-analysis revealed a significant improvement in the healing rate, as evidenced by a weighted odds ratio (OR) of 3.40 (95% CI = 1.87 to 6.21, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 32%, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Additionally, the standard mean difference (SMD) for healed ulcer area favored the PRP group, reflecting an improvement of 1.38 cm<sup>2</sup> (<i>P</i> = 0.02). Furthermore, the reduction in PUSH scores within the PRP group outperformed that observed in the control group, demonstrating a SMD of 1.69 (<i>P</i> = 0.01). Nevertheless, complications and the SMD for ulcer volume reduction revealed no statistically significant differences between the groups. From these findings, PRP stands out as a promising and safe therapeutic approach for pressure ulcers. For a deeper understanding of PRP's role in pressure ulcer healing, it is crucial to conduct more well-structured, high-quality RCTs in upcoming studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The international journal of lower extremity wounds\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The international journal of lower extremity wounds\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346241227001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346241227001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

压疮是临床上常见的慢性伤口,严重影响患者的生活质量,并造成巨大的经济负担。人们一直在探索富血小板血浆(PRP)治疗压疮的潜力。在此,我们开展了一项研究,以评估 PRP 与传统压疮治疗方法相比的有效性和安全性。研究人员在 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 等数据库中进行了全面检索,涵盖了从开始到 2023 年 5 月 20 日发表的研究,仅纳入了评估 PRP 对压疮愈合效果的随机对照试验 (RCT)。研究结果包括愈合率、溃疡面积、溃疡体积、压疮愈合量表(PUSH)评分、愈合时间和并发症。最后,符合纳入标准的研究共有 9 项,涉及 511 名患者的 523 处压迫性溃疡。我们的荟萃分析表明,压疮愈合率显著提高,加权赔率(OR)为 3.40(95% CI = 1.87 至 6.21,I2 = 32%,P 2(P = 0.02))。此外,PRP 组的 PUSH 评分下降幅度超过对照组,SMD 为 1.69(P = 0.01)。不过,并发症和溃疡体积缩小的 SMD 在统计学上显示,两组之间没有显著差异。从这些研究结果来看,PRP 是一种很有前景且安全的压疮治疗方法。为了更深入地了解 PRP 在压疮愈合中的作用,在接下来的研究中进行更多结构合理、高质量的 RCT 至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and Safety of Platelet-Rich Plasma for Pressure Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Pressure ulcers are common chronic wounds in clinical practice, severely affecting patients' quality of life and causing substantial economic burdens. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been explored for its potential in treating pressure ulcers. Herein, a study was carried out to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PRP in comparison to conventional treatments for pressure ulcers. A comprehensive search was conducted in databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, covering studies published from the inception to May 20, 2023, with only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of PRP on the healing of pressure ulcers included. The outcomes of interest included healing rates, ulcer area, ulcer volume, Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) score, healing time, and complications. Finally, 9 RCTs, involving 511 patients with 523 pressure ulcers, met the inclusion criteria. Our meta-analysis revealed a significant improvement in the healing rate, as evidenced by a weighted odds ratio (OR) of 3.40 (95% CI = 1.87 to 6.21, I2 = 32%, P < 0.0001). Additionally, the standard mean difference (SMD) for healed ulcer area favored the PRP group, reflecting an improvement of 1.38 cm2 (P = 0.02). Furthermore, the reduction in PUSH scores within the PRP group outperformed that observed in the control group, demonstrating a SMD of 1.69 (P = 0.01). Nevertheless, complications and the SMD for ulcer volume reduction revealed no statistically significant differences between the groups. From these findings, PRP stands out as a promising and safe therapeutic approach for pressure ulcers. For a deeper understanding of PRP's role in pressure ulcer healing, it is crucial to conduct more well-structured, high-quality RCTs in upcoming studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信