为脊髓损伤患者提供基于社区的结构化锻炼计划的可行性。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1080/10790268.2023.2293327
Kerri A Morgan, Kelly L Taylor, Rachel Heeb Desai, Kimberly Walker, Susan Tucker, Carla Wilson Walker, Holly Hollingswoth, W Todd Cade
{"title":"为脊髓损伤患者提供基于社区的结构化锻炼计划的可行性。","authors":"Kerri A Morgan, Kelly L Taylor, Rachel Heeb Desai, Kimberly Walker, Susan Tucker, Carla Wilson Walker, Holly Hollingswoth, W Todd Cade","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2023.2293327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>(1) Examine the feasibility of a community-based exercise intervention for persons with spinal cord injury and (2) compare the cardiorespiratory fitness, skeletal muscle strength, and psychosocial well-being of participants in the intervention group versus control group.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Community-based pilot randomized controlled trial. <i>Setting</i>: Accessible community-based health and wellness center. <i>Participants</i>: Thirty-two sedentary community-dwelling adults with any level of spinal cord injury. <i>Interventions:</i> Participants were randomized to a 36-session/12-week community-based exercise program (intervention; EG) or to a 36-session/12-week physical activity education group (control; CG). <i>Outcome measures</i>: Primary outcome measures included cardiorespiratory fitness measured by a VO<sub>2</sub>peak test, a composite score of four upper extremity musculoskeletal strength 1-repetition maximum exercises, and feasibility measured by EG participants' adherence and exercise intensity achieved during the program. EG participants' acceptance of the program was also evaluated using a self-reported satisfaction scale. Self-efficacy, motivation, pain, and goal performance and satisfaction were secondary outcome measures. Adherence and acceptability were also measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen participants (<i>n</i> = 15) completed the community-based exercise intervention and seventeen (<i>n</i> = 17) completed the education program. While no statistically significant differences were found, the EG experienced changes of moderate effect size in cardiorespiratory fitness, strength, motivation, and satisfaction with their goals. The EG attended, on average, two sessions per week. The community-based exercise intervention was highly accepted by and satisfying for participants to engage in.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The EG had improvements in the two primary measures, cardiorespiratory fitness and musculoskeletal strength, following the intervention. The community-based exercise intervention was feasible and accepted by participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"338-350"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11864005/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of a community-based structured exercise program for persons with spinal cord injury.\",\"authors\":\"Kerri A Morgan, Kelly L Taylor, Rachel Heeb Desai, Kimberly Walker, Susan Tucker, Carla Wilson Walker, Holly Hollingswoth, W Todd Cade\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10790268.2023.2293327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>(1) Examine the feasibility of a community-based exercise intervention for persons with spinal cord injury and (2) compare the cardiorespiratory fitness, skeletal muscle strength, and psychosocial well-being of participants in the intervention group versus control group.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Community-based pilot randomized controlled trial. <i>Setting</i>: Accessible community-based health and wellness center. <i>Participants</i>: Thirty-two sedentary community-dwelling adults with any level of spinal cord injury. <i>Interventions:</i> Participants were randomized to a 36-session/12-week community-based exercise program (intervention; EG) or to a 36-session/12-week physical activity education group (control; CG). <i>Outcome measures</i>: Primary outcome measures included cardiorespiratory fitness measured by a VO<sub>2</sub>peak test, a composite score of four upper extremity musculoskeletal strength 1-repetition maximum exercises, and feasibility measured by EG participants' adherence and exercise intensity achieved during the program. EG participants' acceptance of the program was also evaluated using a self-reported satisfaction scale. Self-efficacy, motivation, pain, and goal performance and satisfaction were secondary outcome measures. Adherence and acceptability were also measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen participants (<i>n</i> = 15) completed the community-based exercise intervention and seventeen (<i>n</i> = 17) completed the education program. While no statistically significant differences were found, the EG experienced changes of moderate effect size in cardiorespiratory fitness, strength, motivation, and satisfaction with their goals. The EG attended, on average, two sessions per week. The community-based exercise intervention was highly accepted by and satisfying for participants to engage in.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The EG had improvements in the two primary measures, cardiorespiratory fitness and musculoskeletal strength, following the intervention. The community-based exercise intervention was feasible and accepted by participants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"338-350\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11864005/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2023.2293327\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2023.2293327","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:(1)研究为脊髓损伤者提供社区运动干预的可行性;(2)比较干预组与对照组参与者的心肺功能、骨骼肌力量和社会心理健康:设计:社区试点随机对照试验。设计:社区试点随机对照试验:无障碍社区健康中心。参与者32 名久坐不动、在社区居住、患有任何程度脊髓损伤的成年人。干预:参与者被随机分配到为期 36 节课/12 周的社区锻炼计划(干预组;EG)或为期 36 节课/12 周的体育活动教育组(对照组;CG)。结果测量:主要结果测量指标包括心肺功能(通过 VO2 峰值测试测量)、四项上肢肌肉骨骼力量 1 次重复最大运动量的综合评分,以及可行性(通过 EG 参与者的坚持程度和在计划期间达到的运动强度测量)。此外,还使用自我报告满意度量表对 EG 参与者对该计划的接受程度进行了评估。自我效能、动机、疼痛、目标表现和满意度是次要结果测量指标。此外,还对坚持性和可接受性进行了测量:结果:15 名参与者(n = 15)完成了社区运动干预,17 名参与者(n = 17)完成了教育计划。虽然没有发现统计学上的显著差异,但教育小组在心肺功能、力量、积极性和对目标的满意度方面都发生了中等程度的变化。教育小组平均每周参加两次课程。参加者对社区运动干预的接受度和满意度都很高:结论:干预后,环境小组在心肺功能和肌肉骨骼力量这两项主要指标上都有所改善。以社区为基础的运动干预是可行的,也得到了参与者的认可。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility of a community-based structured exercise program for persons with spinal cord injury.

Objectives: (1) Examine the feasibility of a community-based exercise intervention for persons with spinal cord injury and (2) compare the cardiorespiratory fitness, skeletal muscle strength, and psychosocial well-being of participants in the intervention group versus control group.

Design: Community-based pilot randomized controlled trial. Setting: Accessible community-based health and wellness center. Participants: Thirty-two sedentary community-dwelling adults with any level of spinal cord injury. Interventions: Participants were randomized to a 36-session/12-week community-based exercise program (intervention; EG) or to a 36-session/12-week physical activity education group (control; CG). Outcome measures: Primary outcome measures included cardiorespiratory fitness measured by a VO2peak test, a composite score of four upper extremity musculoskeletal strength 1-repetition maximum exercises, and feasibility measured by EG participants' adherence and exercise intensity achieved during the program. EG participants' acceptance of the program was also evaluated using a self-reported satisfaction scale. Self-efficacy, motivation, pain, and goal performance and satisfaction were secondary outcome measures. Adherence and acceptability were also measured.

Results: Fifteen participants (n = 15) completed the community-based exercise intervention and seventeen (n = 17) completed the education program. While no statistically significant differences were found, the EG experienced changes of moderate effect size in cardiorespiratory fitness, strength, motivation, and satisfaction with their goals. The EG attended, on average, two sessions per week. The community-based exercise intervention was highly accepted by and satisfying for participants to engage in.

Conclusions: The EG had improvements in the two primary measures, cardiorespiratory fitness and musculoskeletal strength, following the intervention. The community-based exercise intervention was feasible and accepted by participants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信