利用三种不同材料评估临时冠的边缘和内部适应性

Q3 Dentistry
Ezatollah Jalalian, Farzan Younesi, Shaghayegh Golalipour, Sotude Khorshidi, Seyed Hamed Mahdavisaedabadi, Maryam Sayyari
{"title":"利用三种不同材料评估临时冠的边缘和内部适应性","authors":"Ezatollah Jalalian, Farzan Younesi, Shaghayegh Golalipour, Sotude Khorshidi, Seyed Hamed Mahdavisaedabadi, Maryam Sayyari","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to assess the marginal and internal adaptation of provisional crowns fabricated from polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) blocks by the computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system, autopolymerizing PMMA, and acrylic base composite resin.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this <i>in vitro</i> experimental study, a brass die was obtained, and provisional crowns were fabricated in three groups using Teliocad PMMA blocks by the CAD/CAM system, Tempron GC auto-polymerizing PMMA, and Bisico acrylic base composite resin (<i>n</i> = 7 in each group). The provisional crowns were coded and randomly placed on the die. Their marginal adaptation was evaluated under a stereomicroscope at 40× magnification, while their internal adaptation was assessed by the replica technique. Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean marginal gap was the highest in autopolymerizing PMMA and the lowest in the CAD/CAM PMMA group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The mean marginal gap in the autopolymerizing PMMA group was significantly higher than that in the resin material (<i>p</i> = 0.014) and CAD/CAM PMMA (<i>p</i> = 0.000) groups. The difference between the resin material and CAD/CAM PMMA groups was not significant (<i>p</i> = 0.13). The mean internal gap was the highest in autopolymerizing PMMA group and the lowest in CAD/CAM PMMA group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The mean internal gap in autopolymerizing PMMA group was significantly higher than that in composite resin (<i>p</i> = 0.002) and CAD/CAM PMMA (<i>p</i> = 0.00) groups. The difference between the resin material and CAD/CAM PMMA groups was not significant (<i>p</i> = 0.322).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Computer-aided design/Computer-aided manufacturing PMMA provisional crowns showed the highest marginal and internal adaptation followed by acrylic base resin material crowns.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing PMMA crowns demonstrate superior marginal and internal adaptation compared with autopolymerizing PMMA and acrylic base composite resin crowns, suggesting CAD/CAM technology's potential for enhancing clinical outcomes. How to cite this article: Jalalian E, Younesi F, Golalipour S, <i>et al.</i> Assessment of Marginal and Internal Adaptation in Provisional Crowns Utilizing Three Distinct Materials. J Contemp Dent Pract 2023;24(11):853-858.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Marginal and Internal Adaptation in Provisional Crowns Utilizing Three Distinct Materials.\",\"authors\":\"Ezatollah Jalalian, Farzan Younesi, Shaghayegh Golalipour, Sotude Khorshidi, Seyed Hamed Mahdavisaedabadi, Maryam Sayyari\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to assess the marginal and internal adaptation of provisional crowns fabricated from polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) blocks by the computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system, autopolymerizing PMMA, and acrylic base composite resin.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this <i>in vitro</i> experimental study, a brass die was obtained, and provisional crowns were fabricated in three groups using Teliocad PMMA blocks by the CAD/CAM system, Tempron GC auto-polymerizing PMMA, and Bisico acrylic base composite resin (<i>n</i> = 7 in each group). The provisional crowns were coded and randomly placed on the die. Their marginal adaptation was evaluated under a stereomicroscope at 40× magnification, while their internal adaptation was assessed by the replica technique. Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean marginal gap was the highest in autopolymerizing PMMA and the lowest in the CAD/CAM PMMA group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The mean marginal gap in the autopolymerizing PMMA group was significantly higher than that in the resin material (<i>p</i> = 0.014) and CAD/CAM PMMA (<i>p</i> = 0.000) groups. The difference between the resin material and CAD/CAM PMMA groups was not significant (<i>p</i> = 0.13). The mean internal gap was the highest in autopolymerizing PMMA group and the lowest in CAD/CAM PMMA group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The mean internal gap in autopolymerizing PMMA group was significantly higher than that in composite resin (<i>p</i> = 0.002) and CAD/CAM PMMA (<i>p</i> = 0.00) groups. The difference between the resin material and CAD/CAM PMMA groups was not significant (<i>p</i> = 0.322).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Computer-aided design/Computer-aided manufacturing PMMA provisional crowns showed the highest marginal and internal adaptation followed by acrylic base resin material crowns.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing PMMA crowns demonstrate superior marginal and internal adaptation compared with autopolymerizing PMMA and acrylic base composite resin crowns, suggesting CAD/CAM technology's potential for enhancing clinical outcomes. How to cite this article: Jalalian E, Younesi F, Golalipour S, <i>et al.</i> Assessment of Marginal and Internal Adaptation in Provisional Crowns Utilizing Three Distinct Materials. J Contemp Dent Pract 2023;24(11):853-858.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3589\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估通过计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)系统使用聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)块、自动聚合PMMA和丙烯酸基底复合树脂制作的临时牙冠的边缘和内部适应性:在这项体外实验研究中,通过计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)系统获得了一个黄铜模具,并使用Teliocad PMMA块、Tempron GC自动聚合PMMA和Bisico丙烯酸基底复合树脂分三组制作了临时牙冠(每组n = 7)。临时牙冠被编码并随机放置在模具上。在放大 40 倍的体视显微镜下评估其边缘适应性,而内部适应性则通过复制技术进行评估。数据采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)(α = 0.05)进行分析:结果:自聚 PMMA 组的平均边缘间隙最大,CAD/CAM PMMA 组的平均边缘间隙最小(p < 0.05)。自聚 PMMA 组的平均边缘间隙明显高于树脂材料组(p = 0.014)和 CAD/CAM PMMA 组(p = 0.000)。树脂材料组和 CAD/CAM PMMA 组之间的差异不显著(p = 0.13)。自聚 PMMA 组的平均内部间隙最大,CAD/CAM PMMA 组的平均内部间隙最小(p < 0.05)。自聚 PMMA 组的平均内部间隙明显高于复合树脂组(p = 0.002)和 CAD/CAM PMMA 组(p = 0.00)。树脂材料组和 CAD/CAM PMMA 组之间的差异不显著(p = 0.322):结论:计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造的PMMA临时冠显示出最高的边缘和内部适应性,其次是丙烯酸基底树脂材料冠:临床意义:计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造的PMMA冠与自聚合PMMA和丙烯酸基底复合树脂冠相比,显示出更优越的边缘和内部适应性,表明CAD/CAM技术具有提高临床效果的潜力。本文引用方式Jalalian E, Younesi F, Golalipour S, et al. 使用三种不同材料的临时冠边缘和内部适应性评估。J Contemp Dent Pract 2023; 24(11):853-858.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Marginal and Internal Adaptation in Provisional Crowns Utilizing Three Distinct Materials.

Aims: This study aimed to assess the marginal and internal adaptation of provisional crowns fabricated from polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) blocks by the computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system, autopolymerizing PMMA, and acrylic base composite resin.

Materials and methods: In this in vitro experimental study, a brass die was obtained, and provisional crowns were fabricated in three groups using Teliocad PMMA blocks by the CAD/CAM system, Tempron GC auto-polymerizing PMMA, and Bisico acrylic base composite resin (n = 7 in each group). The provisional crowns were coded and randomly placed on the die. Their marginal adaptation was evaluated under a stereomicroscope at 40× magnification, while their internal adaptation was assessed by the replica technique. Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (α = 0.05).

Results: The mean marginal gap was the highest in autopolymerizing PMMA and the lowest in the CAD/CAM PMMA group (p < 0.05). The mean marginal gap in the autopolymerizing PMMA group was significantly higher than that in the resin material (p = 0.014) and CAD/CAM PMMA (p = 0.000) groups. The difference between the resin material and CAD/CAM PMMA groups was not significant (p = 0.13). The mean internal gap was the highest in autopolymerizing PMMA group and the lowest in CAD/CAM PMMA group (p < 0.05). The mean internal gap in autopolymerizing PMMA group was significantly higher than that in composite resin (p = 0.002) and CAD/CAM PMMA (p = 0.00) groups. The difference between the resin material and CAD/CAM PMMA groups was not significant (p = 0.322).

Conclusion: Computer-aided design/Computer-aided manufacturing PMMA provisional crowns showed the highest marginal and internal adaptation followed by acrylic base resin material crowns.

Clinical significance: Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing PMMA crowns demonstrate superior marginal and internal adaptation compared with autopolymerizing PMMA and acrylic base composite resin crowns, suggesting CAD/CAM technology's potential for enhancing clinical outcomes. How to cite this article: Jalalian E, Younesi F, Golalipour S, et al. Assessment of Marginal and Internal Adaptation in Provisional Crowns Utilizing Three Distinct Materials. J Contemp Dent Pract 2023;24(11):853-858.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (JCDP), is a peer-reviewed, open access MEDLINE indexed journal. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.thejcdp.com. The journal allows free access (open access) to its contents. Articles with clinical relevance will be given preference for publication. The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, rare and novel case reports, and clinical techniques. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of dentistry i.e., conservative dentistry and endodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthodontics, oral medicine and radiology, oral pathology, oral surgery, orodental diseases, pediatric dentistry, implantology, periodontics, clinical aspects of public health dentistry, and prosthodontics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信