关于血液净化过程中白蛋白的总损失。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-18 DOI:10.1007/s10047-023-01430-y
Anastasios J Karabelas
{"title":"关于血液净化过程中白蛋白的总损失。","authors":"Anastasios J Karabelas","doi":"10.1007/s10047-023-01430-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Excessive albumin losses during HC (haemocatharsis) are considered a potential cause of hypoalbuminemia-a key risk factor for mortality. This review on total albumin losses considers albumin \"leaking\" into the dialysate and losses due to protein/membrane interactions (i.e. adsorption, \"secondary membrane formation\" and denaturation). The former are fairly easy to determine, usually varying at the level of ~ 2 g to ~ 7 g albumin loss per session. Such values, commonly accepted as representative of the total albumin losses, are often quoted as limits/standards of permissible albumin loss per session. On albumin mass lost due to adsorption/deposition, which is the result of complicated interactions and rather difficult to determine, scant in vivo data exist and there is great uncertainty and confusion regarding their magnitude; this is possibly responsible for neglecting their contribution to the total losses at present. Yet, many relevant in vitro studies suggest that losses of albumin due to protein/membrane interactions are likely comparable to (or even greater than) those due to leaking, particularly in the currently favoured high-convection HDF (haemodiafiltration) treatment. Therefore, it is emphasised that top research priority should be given to resolve these issues, primarily by developing appropriate/facile in vivo test-methods and related analytical techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11126488/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the total albumin losses during haemocatharsis.\",\"authors\":\"Anastasios J Karabelas\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10047-023-01430-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Excessive albumin losses during HC (haemocatharsis) are considered a potential cause of hypoalbuminemia-a key risk factor for mortality. This review on total albumin losses considers albumin \\\"leaking\\\" into the dialysate and losses due to protein/membrane interactions (i.e. adsorption, \\\"secondary membrane formation\\\" and denaturation). The former are fairly easy to determine, usually varying at the level of ~ 2 g to ~ 7 g albumin loss per session. Such values, commonly accepted as representative of the total albumin losses, are often quoted as limits/standards of permissible albumin loss per session. On albumin mass lost due to adsorption/deposition, which is the result of complicated interactions and rather difficult to determine, scant in vivo data exist and there is great uncertainty and confusion regarding their magnitude; this is possibly responsible for neglecting their contribution to the total losses at present. Yet, many relevant in vitro studies suggest that losses of albumin due to protein/membrane interactions are likely comparable to (or even greater than) those due to leaking, particularly in the currently favoured high-convection HDF (haemodiafiltration) treatment. Therefore, it is emphasised that top research priority should be given to resolve these issues, primarily by developing appropriate/facile in vivo test-methods and related analytical techniques.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11126488/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-023-01430-y\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-023-01430-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

血液透析过程中白蛋白损失过多被认为是导致低白蛋白血症的潜在原因,而低白蛋白血症是导致死亡的关键风险因素。这篇关于白蛋白总损失的综述考虑了 "渗漏 "到透析液中的白蛋白以及蛋白质/膜相互作用(即吸附、"二次膜形成 "和变性)造成的损失。前者相当容易确定,通常在每次透析损失约 2 克至约 7 克白蛋白的水平上变化。这些数值通常被认为是白蛋白总损失量的代表,经常被引用为每疗程白蛋白允许损失量的限制/标准。吸附/沉积造成的白蛋白损失量是复杂的相互作用的结果,很难确定,目前体内数据很少,对其大小存在很大的不确定性和混淆;这可能是目前忽视其对总损失量的贡献的原因。然而,许多相关的体外研究表明,蛋白质/膜相互作用造成的白蛋白损失可能与渗漏造成的损失相当(甚至更大),特别是在目前流行的高通量 HDF(血液二次过滤)处理中。因此,需要强调的是,应将解决这些问题作为研究的重中之重,主要是通过开发适当/简便的体内测试方法和相关分析技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

On the total albumin losses during haemocatharsis.

On the total albumin losses during haemocatharsis.

Excessive albumin losses during HC (haemocatharsis) are considered a potential cause of hypoalbuminemia-a key risk factor for mortality. This review on total albumin losses considers albumin "leaking" into the dialysate and losses due to protein/membrane interactions (i.e. adsorption, "secondary membrane formation" and denaturation). The former are fairly easy to determine, usually varying at the level of ~ 2 g to ~ 7 g albumin loss per session. Such values, commonly accepted as representative of the total albumin losses, are often quoted as limits/standards of permissible albumin loss per session. On albumin mass lost due to adsorption/deposition, which is the result of complicated interactions and rather difficult to determine, scant in vivo data exist and there is great uncertainty and confusion regarding their magnitude; this is possibly responsible for neglecting their contribution to the total losses at present. Yet, many relevant in vitro studies suggest that losses of albumin due to protein/membrane interactions are likely comparable to (or even greater than) those due to leaking, particularly in the currently favoured high-convection HDF (haemodiafiltration) treatment. Therefore, it is emphasised that top research priority should be given to resolve these issues, primarily by developing appropriate/facile in vivo test-methods and related analytical techniques.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信