青少年学生运动员得分低于 ImPACT 嵌入式有效性指标的普遍性和相关性。

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Clinical Neuropsychologist Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-17 DOI:10.1080/13854046.2023.2287777
Brian C Liu, Grant L Iverson, Nathan E Cook, Philip Schatz, Paul Berkner, Charles E Gaudet
{"title":"青少年学生运动员得分低于 ImPACT 嵌入式有效性指标的普遍性和相关性。","authors":"Brian C Liu, Grant L Iverson, Nathan E Cook, Philip Schatz, Paul Berkner, Charles E Gaudet","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2023.2287777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Valid performance on preseason baseline neurocognitive testing is essential for accurate comparison between preseason and post-concussion test results. Immediate Post-Concussion and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) is commonly used to measure baseline neurocognitive function in athletes. We examined the prevalence of invalid performance on ImPACT baseline testing and identified correlates of invalid performance. <b>Method:</b> The sample included 66,998 adolescents (ages 14-18, <i>M</i> = 15.51 years, SD = 1.22) who completed ImPACT baseline tests between 2009 and 2019. Invalid performance was determined by the embedded validity indicators (EVI). Associations between invalid performance, demographic characteristics, and health conditions were assessed using chi-square tests and odds ratios (ORs). <b>Results:</b> Overall, 7.2% of adolescents had baseline tests identified as invalid by one or more of the EVIs. Individual validity indicators classified between 0.5% and 3.7% tests as invalid. Higher frequencies of invalid scores were observed among youth with neurodevelopmental, academic, and medical conditions. Youth who reported having learning disabilities (<i>n</i> = 3126), receiving special education (<i>n</i> = 3563), or problems with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD; <i>n</i> = 5104) obtained invalid baselines at frequencies of 16.4%, 16.0%, and 11.1%, respectively. Moreover, youth who reported receiving treatment for a substance use disorder (<i>n</i> = 311) or epilepsy (<i>n</i> = 718) obtained invalid baselines at frequencies of 17.0% and 11.1%, respectively. <b>Conclusions:</b> The base rate of invalid performance on ImPACT's EVIs was approximately 7%, consistent with prior research. Adolescents self-reporting neurodevelopmental conditions, academic difficulties, or a history of treatment for medical conditions obtained invalid baseline tests at higher frequencies. More research is needed to better understand invalid scores in youth with pre-existing conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":55250,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","volume":" ","pages":"1175-1192"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The prevalence and correlates of scores falling below ImPACT embedded validity indicators among adolescent student athletes.\",\"authors\":\"Brian C Liu, Grant L Iverson, Nathan E Cook, Philip Schatz, Paul Berkner, Charles E Gaudet\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13854046.2023.2287777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Valid performance on preseason baseline neurocognitive testing is essential for accurate comparison between preseason and post-concussion test results. Immediate Post-Concussion and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) is commonly used to measure baseline neurocognitive function in athletes. We examined the prevalence of invalid performance on ImPACT baseline testing and identified correlates of invalid performance. <b>Method:</b> The sample included 66,998 adolescents (ages 14-18, <i>M</i> = 15.51 years, SD = 1.22) who completed ImPACT baseline tests between 2009 and 2019. Invalid performance was determined by the embedded validity indicators (EVI). Associations between invalid performance, demographic characteristics, and health conditions were assessed using chi-square tests and odds ratios (ORs). <b>Results:</b> Overall, 7.2% of adolescents had baseline tests identified as invalid by one or more of the EVIs. Individual validity indicators classified between 0.5% and 3.7% tests as invalid. Higher frequencies of invalid scores were observed among youth with neurodevelopmental, academic, and medical conditions. Youth who reported having learning disabilities (<i>n</i> = 3126), receiving special education (<i>n</i> = 3563), or problems with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD; <i>n</i> = 5104) obtained invalid baselines at frequencies of 16.4%, 16.0%, and 11.1%, respectively. Moreover, youth who reported receiving treatment for a substance use disorder (<i>n</i> = 311) or epilepsy (<i>n</i> = 718) obtained invalid baselines at frequencies of 17.0% and 11.1%, respectively. <b>Conclusions:</b> The base rate of invalid performance on ImPACT's EVIs was approximately 7%, consistent with prior research. Adolescents self-reporting neurodevelopmental conditions, academic difficulties, or a history of treatment for medical conditions obtained invalid baseline tests at higher frequencies. More research is needed to better understand invalid scores in youth with pre-existing conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neuropsychologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1175-1192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neuropsychologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2023.2287777\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2023.2287777","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:季前基线神经认知测试的有效表现对于准确比较季前和脑震荡后测试结果至关重要。脑震荡后即刻认知测试(ImPACT)通常用于测量运动员的基线神经认知功能。我们研究了 ImPACT 基线测试中无效表现的发生率,并确定了无效表现的相关因素。研究方法样本包括在 2009 年至 2019 年期间完成 ImPACT 基线测试的 66,998 名青少年(14-18 岁,M = 15.51 岁,SD = 1.22)。无效表现由嵌入式有效性指标(EVI)确定。采用卡方检验和几率比(ORs)评估无效表现、人口统计学特征和健康状况之间的关联。结果显示总体而言,有 7.2% 的青少年的基线测试被一个或多个 EVI 识别为无效。0.5%到3.7%的测试被单项有效性指标归为无效。在有神经发育、学业和医疗状况的青少年中,发现无效分数的频率较高。报告有学习障碍(n = 3126)、接受特殊教育(n = 3563)或有注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD;n = 5104)问题的青少年的基线无效频率分别为 16.4%、16.0% 和 11.1%。此外,报告接受药物使用障碍(n = 311)或癫痫(n = 718)治疗的青少年获得无效基线的频率分别为 17.0% 和 11.1%。结论:ImPACT的EVIs无效基线率约为7%,与之前的研究结果一致。自我报告有神经发育问题、学业困难或有医疗史的青少年,其基线测试无效的频率较高。要想更好地了解患有先天性疾病的青少年的无效分数,还需要进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The prevalence and correlates of scores falling below ImPACT embedded validity indicators among adolescent student athletes.

Objective: Valid performance on preseason baseline neurocognitive testing is essential for accurate comparison between preseason and post-concussion test results. Immediate Post-Concussion and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) is commonly used to measure baseline neurocognitive function in athletes. We examined the prevalence of invalid performance on ImPACT baseline testing and identified correlates of invalid performance. Method: The sample included 66,998 adolescents (ages 14-18, M = 15.51 years, SD = 1.22) who completed ImPACT baseline tests between 2009 and 2019. Invalid performance was determined by the embedded validity indicators (EVI). Associations between invalid performance, demographic characteristics, and health conditions were assessed using chi-square tests and odds ratios (ORs). Results: Overall, 7.2% of adolescents had baseline tests identified as invalid by one or more of the EVIs. Individual validity indicators classified between 0.5% and 3.7% tests as invalid. Higher frequencies of invalid scores were observed among youth with neurodevelopmental, academic, and medical conditions. Youth who reported having learning disabilities (n = 3126), receiving special education (n = 3563), or problems with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD; n = 5104) obtained invalid baselines at frequencies of 16.4%, 16.0%, and 11.1%, respectively. Moreover, youth who reported receiving treatment for a substance use disorder (n = 311) or epilepsy (n = 718) obtained invalid baselines at frequencies of 17.0% and 11.1%, respectively. Conclusions: The base rate of invalid performance on ImPACT's EVIs was approximately 7%, consistent with prior research. Adolescents self-reporting neurodevelopmental conditions, academic difficulties, or a history of treatment for medical conditions obtained invalid baseline tests at higher frequencies. More research is needed to better understand invalid scores in youth with pre-existing conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropsychologist
Clinical Neuropsychologist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.80%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Clinical Neuropsychologist (TCN) serves as the premier forum for (1) state-of-the-art clinically-relevant scientific research, (2) in-depth professional discussions of matters germane to evidence-based practice, and (3) clinical case studies in neuropsychology. Of particular interest are papers that can make definitive statements about a given topic (thereby having implications for the standards of clinical practice) and those with the potential to expand today’s clinical frontiers. Research on all age groups, and on both clinical and normal populations, is considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信