{"title":"新型自粘复合树脂与三种不同树脂基质陶瓷 CAD-CAM 材料的修复粘接强度。","authors":"Hande Kemaloglu, Ozge Cay, Elif Ercan Devrimci, Tijen Pamir","doi":"10.4012/dmj.2023-165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength of two flowable composite resins to resin-matrix ceramic CAD-CAM materials.Fifty-four plates obtained from Lava Ultimate (LU), Cerasmart (CS), and Vita Enamic (VE) CAD-CAM blocks were assigned to nine groups: N0: Nova Compo SF (NCSF), N1: Silane/Single Bond Universal (SBU)/NCSF, N2: SBU/NCSF, N3: Silane/G-Premio Bond (GPB)/NCSF, N4: GPB/NCSF, G1: Silane/SBU/G-aenial Universal Injectable Composite (GUIC), G2: SBU/GUIC, G3: Silane/GPB/GUIC, G4: GPB/GUIC. After the repair procedures, shear bond strength values were analyzed. Silane pre-application decreased bond strength in most LU and CS groups but increased it in VE. NCSF performed better than GUIC in all CAD-CAM's with similar adhesive protocols. SBU in combination with NSCF had the highest bond strength among all repair procedures in LU and CS. Silane-containing universal adhesives in combination with self-adhesive resin composites should be used to repair resin-matrix ceramic materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":11065,"journal":{"name":"Dental materials journal","volume":" ","pages":"137-145"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repair bond strength of a new self-adhesive composite resin to three different resin-matrix ceramic CAD-CAM materials.\",\"authors\":\"Hande Kemaloglu, Ozge Cay, Elif Ercan Devrimci, Tijen Pamir\",\"doi\":\"10.4012/dmj.2023-165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength of two flowable composite resins to resin-matrix ceramic CAD-CAM materials.Fifty-four plates obtained from Lava Ultimate (LU), Cerasmart (CS), and Vita Enamic (VE) CAD-CAM blocks were assigned to nine groups: N0: Nova Compo SF (NCSF), N1: Silane/Single Bond Universal (SBU)/NCSF, N2: SBU/NCSF, N3: Silane/G-Premio Bond (GPB)/NCSF, N4: GPB/NCSF, G1: Silane/SBU/G-aenial Universal Injectable Composite (GUIC), G2: SBU/GUIC, G3: Silane/GPB/GUIC, G4: GPB/GUIC. After the repair procedures, shear bond strength values were analyzed. Silane pre-application decreased bond strength in most LU and CS groups but increased it in VE. NCSF performed better than GUIC in all CAD-CAM's with similar adhesive protocols. SBU in combination with NSCF had the highest bond strength among all repair procedures in LU and CS. Silane-containing universal adhesives in combination with self-adhesive resin composites should be used to repair resin-matrix ceramic materials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental materials journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"137-145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental materials journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2023-165\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental materials journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2023-165","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在评估两种可流动复合树脂与树脂基质陶瓷 CAD-CAM 材料的剪切粘接强度。研究人员将从 Lava Ultimate (LU)、Cerasmart (CS) 和 Vita Enamic (VE) CAD-CAM 块中获得的 54 块板材分成九组：N0：Nova Compo SF (NCSF)；N1：硅烷/单粘结通用树脂 (SBU)/NCSF；N2：SBU/NCSF；N3：硅烷/G-Premio Bond (GPB)/NCSF；N4：GPB/NCSF；G1：硅烷/SBU/G-aenial 通用注射复合材料 (GUIC)；G2：SBU/GUIC；G3：硅烷/GPB/GUIC；G4：GPB/GUIC。修复程序结束后，对剪切粘接强度值进行了分析。在大多数 LU 和 CS 组别中，硅烷的预涂抹降低了粘接强度，但在 VE 组别中，硅烷的预涂抹提高了粘接强度。在使用类似粘合剂的所有 CAD-CAM 中，NCSF 的性能均优于 GUIC。在 LU 和 CS 的所有修复程序中，SBU 结合 NSCF 的粘接强度最高。在修复树脂基质陶瓷材料时，应将含硅烷的通用粘合剂与自粘树脂复合材料结合使用。
Repair bond strength of a new self-adhesive composite resin to three different resin-matrix ceramic CAD-CAM materials.
This study aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength of two flowable composite resins to resin-matrix ceramic CAD-CAM materials.Fifty-four plates obtained from Lava Ultimate (LU), Cerasmart (CS), and Vita Enamic (VE) CAD-CAM blocks were assigned to nine groups: N0: Nova Compo SF (NCSF), N1: Silane/Single Bond Universal (SBU)/NCSF, N2: SBU/NCSF, N3: Silane/G-Premio Bond (GPB)/NCSF, N4: GPB/NCSF, G1: Silane/SBU/G-aenial Universal Injectable Composite (GUIC), G2: SBU/GUIC, G3: Silane/GPB/GUIC, G4: GPB/GUIC. After the repair procedures, shear bond strength values were analyzed. Silane pre-application decreased bond strength in most LU and CS groups but increased it in VE. NCSF performed better than GUIC in all CAD-CAM's with similar adhesive protocols. SBU in combination with NSCF had the highest bond strength among all repair procedures in LU and CS. Silane-containing universal adhesives in combination with self-adhesive resin composites should be used to repair resin-matrix ceramic materials.
期刊介绍：
Dental Materials Journal is a peer review journal published by the Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devises aiming to introduce the progress of the basic and applied sciences in dental materials and biomaterials. The dental materials-related clinical science and instrumental technologies are also within the scope of this journal. The materials dealt include synthetic polymers, ceramics, metals and tissue-derived biomaterials. Forefront dental materials and biomaterials used in developing filed, such as tissue engineering, bioengineering and artificial intelligence, are positively considered for the review as well. Recent acceptance rate of the submitted manuscript in the journal is around 30%.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
