肌筋膜松解技术对单侧颈椎病患者的影响:单盲随机临床试验

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Fatih Bali , Gülay Aras Bayram
{"title":"肌筋膜松解技术对单侧颈椎病患者的影响:单盲随机临床试验","authors":"Fatih Bali ,&nbsp;Gülay Aras Bayram","doi":"10.1016/j.explore.2024.01.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the myofascial release technique in individuals diagnosed with unilateral cervical radiculopathy.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Thirty-four cervical radiculopathy patients were randomly assigned to either the myofascial release group or the exercise group. Both groups received conventional treatment. Additionally, the exercise group performed stretching and strengthening exercises while the myofascial release group received the myofascial release technique. The pain pressure threshold, muscle strength, cervical range of motion, pain, and disability variables were assessed for all patients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The myofascial release group demonstrated significantly larger improvements in flexion (<em>p</em> = 0.001), extension (<em>p</em> = 0.037), left rotation (<em>p</em> = 0.012), and left lateral flexion (<em>p</em> = 0.001) range of motions compared to the exercise group. Muscle strength in the wrist flexors (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), wrist extensors (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.010), biceps (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and triceps (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) were significantly higher in the myofascial release group compared to the exercise group. And, again, the myofascial release group demonstrated significantly larger improvements in wrist flexors (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), wrist extensors (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), biceps (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), triceps (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), pectorals (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), subscapularis (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), upper trapezius (<em>p</em> = 0.002), and the pain pressure threshold. Finally, the myofascial release group demonstrated statistically significant improvements in pain (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and disability (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) scales compared to the exercise group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Evaluation of the arm muscle strength and pain pressure threshold variables in patients with cervical radiculopathy may benefit clinicians in the preparation of treatments. Cervical radiculopathy symptoms may improve after the application of myofascial release techniques. A customized cervical exercise program and conventional treatment could be added to the non-surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50459,"journal":{"name":"Explore-The Journal of Science and Healing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of myofascial release technique in patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy: A single blind-randomized clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"Fatih Bali ,&nbsp;Gülay Aras Bayram\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.explore.2024.01.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the myofascial release technique in individuals diagnosed with unilateral cervical radiculopathy.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Thirty-four cervical radiculopathy patients were randomly assigned to either the myofascial release group or the exercise group. Both groups received conventional treatment. Additionally, the exercise group performed stretching and strengthening exercises while the myofascial release group received the myofascial release technique. The pain pressure threshold, muscle strength, cervical range of motion, pain, and disability variables were assessed for all patients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The myofascial release group demonstrated significantly larger improvements in flexion (<em>p</em> = 0.001), extension (<em>p</em> = 0.037), left rotation (<em>p</em> = 0.012), and left lateral flexion (<em>p</em> = 0.001) range of motions compared to the exercise group. Muscle strength in the wrist flexors (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), wrist extensors (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.010), biceps (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and triceps (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) were significantly higher in the myofascial release group compared to the exercise group. And, again, the myofascial release group demonstrated significantly larger improvements in wrist flexors (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), wrist extensors (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), biceps (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), triceps (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), pectorals (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), subscapularis (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), upper trapezius (<em>p</em> = 0.002), and the pain pressure threshold. Finally, the myofascial release group demonstrated statistically significant improvements in pain (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and disability (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) scales compared to the exercise group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Evaluation of the arm muscle strength and pain pressure threshold variables in patients with cervical radiculopathy may benefit clinicians in the preparation of treatments. Cervical radiculopathy symptoms may improve after the application of myofascial release techniques. A customized cervical exercise program and conventional treatment could be added to the non-surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Explore-The Journal of Science and Healing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Explore-The Journal of Science and Healing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550830724000077\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Explore-The Journal of Science and Healing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550830724000077","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

材料与方法34 名颈椎病患者被随机分配到肌筋膜松解组或锻炼组。两组均接受常规治疗。此外,运动组进行伸展和强化训练,而肌筋膜松解组接受肌筋膜松解技术。结果与锻炼组相比,肌筋膜松解组在屈曲(p =0.001)、伸展(p =0.037)、左旋(p =0.012)和左侧屈(p =0.001)活动范围方面的改善幅度明显更大。与锻炼组相比,肌筋膜松解组的腕屈肌(p <0.001)、腕伸肌(p <0.010)、肱二头肌(p <0.001)和肱三头肌(p <0.001)的肌力明显更高。同样,肌筋膜释放组在腕屈肌 (p <0.001)、腕伸肌 (p <0.001)、肱二头肌 (p <0.001)、肱三头肌 (p <0.001)、胸大肌 (p <0.001)、肩胛下肌 (p <0.001)、斜方肌上部 (p =0.002)和疼痛压力阈值方面的改善也明显更大。最后,与锻炼组相比,肌筋膜松解组在疼痛(p <0.001)和残疾(p <0.001)量表方面有显著的统计学改善。应用肌筋膜松解技术后,颈椎病症状可能会有所改善。在颈椎病的非手术治疗中,还可加入定制的颈椎锻炼计划和常规治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of myofascial release technique in patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy: A single blind-randomized clinical trial

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the myofascial release technique in individuals diagnosed with unilateral cervical radiculopathy.

Materials and methods

Thirty-four cervical radiculopathy patients were randomly assigned to either the myofascial release group or the exercise group. Both groups received conventional treatment. Additionally, the exercise group performed stretching and strengthening exercises while the myofascial release group received the myofascial release technique. The pain pressure threshold, muscle strength, cervical range of motion, pain, and disability variables were assessed for all patients.

Results

The myofascial release group demonstrated significantly larger improvements in flexion (p = 0.001), extension (p = 0.037), left rotation (p = 0.012), and left lateral flexion (p = 0.001) range of motions compared to the exercise group. Muscle strength in the wrist flexors (p < 0.001), wrist extensors (p < 0.010), biceps (p < 0.001) and triceps (p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the myofascial release group compared to the exercise group. And, again, the myofascial release group demonstrated significantly larger improvements in wrist flexors (p < 0.001), wrist extensors (p < 0.001), biceps (p < 0.001), triceps (p < 0.001), pectorals (p < 0.001), subscapularis (p < 0.001), upper trapezius (p = 0.002), and the pain pressure threshold. Finally, the myofascial release group demonstrated statistically significant improvements in pain (p < 0.001) and disability (p < 0.001) scales compared to the exercise group.

Conclusion

Evaluation of the arm muscle strength and pain pressure threshold variables in patients with cervical radiculopathy may benefit clinicians in the preparation of treatments. Cervical radiculopathy symptoms may improve after the application of myofascial release techniques. A customized cervical exercise program and conventional treatment could be added to the non-surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Explore-The Journal of Science and Healing
Explore-The Journal of Science and Healing 医学-全科医学与补充医学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
179
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: EXPLORE: The Journal of Science & Healing addresses the scientific principles behind, and applications of, evidence-based healing practices from a wide variety of sources, including conventional, alternative, and cross-cultural medicine. It is an interdisciplinary journal that explores the healing arts, consciousness, spirituality, eco-environmental issues, and basic science as all these fields relate to health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信